Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the dcs act 2003 section 55 · Page 1 of about 644 results (0.079 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 21 2008

Avtar Vinayak Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-21-2008

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972 - Sections 55 and 59(2); Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules - Rule 25

Reported in : 152(2008)DLT486; 2008(106)DRJ440

for increase in membership strength. Regarding the allegations made by the petitioner, an inquiry under Section 55 of the DCS Act, 1972 had been ordered.19. Respondent No. 1-DDA in its counter affidavit has urged that disputed questions of fact … the writ petition which raises disputed questions of fact. Petitioner has efficacious remedy under the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003, which has not been resorted to. It is alleged that petitioner during the year 1999-2000, manipulated the records

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2017

Archit Shukla & Ors vs.the Registrar Cooperative Societies, Govt. ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-27-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

respondent No.1/RCS appointed Sh. Dayal Singh, Asstt. Labour Commissioner (Retd.) as an Inspecting Officer under Section 61 of DCS Act 2003 to look into various issues including the validity of 55 members enrolled during the year 2008-09. He submitted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2017

Shri Khiya Ram Khilwani & Anr vs.registrar of Cooperative Societie ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-27-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

respondent No.1/RCS appointed Sh. Dayal Singh, Asstt. Labour Commissioner (Retd.) as an Inspecting Officer under Section 61 of DCS Act 2003 to look into various issues including the validity of 55 members enrolled during the year 2008-09. He submitted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 29 2005

State Bank of Hyderabad Vs. M. Somasundaram

Court : DRAT Madras

Decided on : Aug-29-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : I(2006)BC62

and liabilities of buyer and seller are governed by the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Section 55 of the Transfer of Property Act deals with the rights and liability of the buyer and seller which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2026

Chander Kanta vs Delhi Dental Council and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-11-2026

Subject : Education

salary.57. This Letter was responded by DDC on 30.11.2005 wherein it wasexplained that her salary arrears from March 2003 to July 2004, i.e., for 17 months, amounting to Rs.1,55,022/-, was being disbursed vide cheque dated 30.11.2005 on … has been reaffirmed that DDC is a statutory bodyconstituted under Dental Council (Delhi) State Rules, 1951 framed under Section 55 of Dentists Act, 1948 and it is the State Dental Council of NCT of Delhi responsible for maintenance

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2026

P.K.Mohamed vs State of Tamilnadu,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-28-2026

an approval, the CMDA issued only a completion certificate but kept the application for planning permission pending. From 2003 till 2007, when the GovernmentOrder imposing infrastructure charges was passed, there wasabsolutely no action from the side of … the duty of the vendor / seller to convey proper title to the purchaser. This is governed under Section 55 of the Transfer of Property Act. This Section outlines the rights and liabilities of both the seller and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2007

Smt. Mina Deogun Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-03-2007

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)117TTJ(Kol.)121

the case, the AO be directed to assess the capital gains with reference to cost of acquisition under Section 55 as on 1st April, 1981 at Rs. 18,40,244 as against Rs. 15,02,907 arbitrarily estimated by the CIT(A). 5. … not striking down the reference to the Valuation Officer made by the AO under Section 55A of the Act and was not justified in upholding the reference under Section 55A(2)(b) even though the said provision was not … of the said property by virtue of succession. During the financial year 2003-04 the said property was transferred by the co-owners for Rs. 12 crores

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2016

Commissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai Vs. P. Sinnasamy and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-23-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

a place and everything is in its place." (xi) In Balram Kumawat v. Union of India reported in 2003 (7) SCC 628, the Supreme Court held that, Contextual reading is a well-known proposition of interpretation of statute. … 1962 or any other law for the time being in force. ............. 55. In the light of the above, let us consider the decisions, relied … (Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, against the Final Order No.455 of 2007, dated 20.04.2007, on the file of Customs, Excise and Service

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2015

M/S Jamia Hamdard Vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-20-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

return, from 2004-05 onwards, as per the Unit Area Method as introduced by the Delhi Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 2003. The self assessment of the property tax returns filed by the petitioner for the year 2004-05 to 2009-10 … value; and incorrect use factor. Consequently, the Deputy Assessor & Collector (GRP) issued a notice dated 08.09.2010 under Section 123D of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (hereafter ‘the Act’) as inserted by Delhi Municipal Corporation (Amendment)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2011

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-06-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

jurisdiction exercises legislative power to amend its regulations which power definitely is there with the Commission, of course. 55. We fail to be in agreement with Mr. Ramachandran when he says that power to remove difficulties as … found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial