Advanced Search Results

Dehal Singh, Dinesh Kumar.Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Narcotic

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 20,42,43,50,50(1)

Pradesh by its common judgment dated 18th October, 2004 passed in Criminal Appeal Nos. 600 and 603 of 2003 dismissed both the appeals.7. Both the appellants assail the aforesaid order by grant of special leave to appeal.8. … he was not in conscious possession has to establish it. Presumption of conscious possession is further available under Section 54 of the Act, which provides that accused may be presumed to have committed the offence unless he accounts

M/s Hotel Shobha, through Its Proprietor: Shri Atul Virendrakumar Jais ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

by all the conditions of the licence, permit, pass or authorisation and the provisions of this Act.” 34 Section 54 gives power to cancel or suspend licences and permits and there are provisions enabling attachment of licences and … or Women/ Social Organization or Representation by Voters in the Village or Ward of Municipal Council/ Corporation) Order, 2003”, under which such complaint is entertained. Therefore, when there is alternate and equally efficacious remedy in law, then,

M/s Hotel Shobha, through Its Proprietor: Shri Atul Virendrakumar Jais ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

or Women/ Social Organization or Representation by Voters in the Village or Ward of Municipal Council/ Corporation) Order, 2003”, under which such complaint is entertained. Therefore, when there is alternate and equally efficacious remedy in law, then, … by all the conditions of the licence, permit, pass or authorisation and the provisions of this Act.” 34 Section 54 gives power to cancel or suspend licences and permits and there are provisions enabling attachment of licences and

Cheney Vs. United States Dist. Court for D. C.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Right to Information

Cheney v. United States Dist. Court for D. C. - 03-475 (2004) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2003 CHENEY V. UNITED STATES DIST. COURT FOR D. C. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CHENEY, VICE PRESIDENT … the Group issued a final report and, according to the Government, terminated all operations, respondents filed these separate actions, later consolidated in the District Court, alleging that the Group had not complied with the Federal Advisory Committee … Information Act litigation. See 219 F. Supp. 2d, at 27. Footnote 3 Section 1292(b) of Title 28 allows a court of appeals, “in its discretion,” … OF THE COURT CHENEY V. UNITED STATES DIST. COURT FOR D. C. 542 U. S. ____ (2004) SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES NO. 03-475

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time … be better to strengthen the remedial mechanisms available under the Act. [Paras 54.4 and 54.5] - [Per Hrishikesh Roy, J. (dissenting)] All unilateral appointments must

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

difficulties faced by the appellant in meeting the norms. Then the appellant filed a tariff petition being No. 54 of 2009 for determination of multi year generation tariff for the control period 2009-2010 to 2011-12. In the … found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue

Commissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai Vs. P. Sinnasamy and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

its place." (xi) In Balram Kumawat v. Union of India reported in 2003 (7) SCC 628, the Supreme Court held that, Contextual reading is a … of goods under transhipment, with the declaration for transhipment referred to in the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 54; (n) any dutiable or prohibited goods transited with or without transhipment or attempted to be so transited in … (Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, against the Final Order No.455 of 2007, dated 20.04.2007, on the file of Customs, Excise and Service

Puttamma and ors. Vs. K.L.Narayana Reddy and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

with the requirement of Section 158(6) keeping in view the requirement indicated in Rule 150 and in Form 54. Periodical checking shall be done by the Inspector General of Police concerned to ensure that the requirements are … to the injuries.4. His wife and children preferred the claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act, 1988), claiming compensation of Rs.30,00,000/-. The 2nd respondent (Insurance Company) contested

The Commissioner of Customs Vs. Shri M. Naushad, Appraiser of

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)(114)ECC379

be sustained in law. Further, the Tribunal in the case of Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai v. M. Vasi 2003 155 ELT (312) held that "abetment presupposes the knowledge of the proposed offence and also presupposes the benefit … clearly noted that the Revenue has not produced any evidence of abetting under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, which clearly lays down that the person to be charged under Section 112(a) should have been involved deliberately … to the declaration given in the Bill of Entry No. 2416 dated 54.2003, Shri. M. Naushad, Appraiser has stated that when the Bill of Entry

Shakuntala Jaiswal Vs. Acit, Range-ii

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

the alternative. the ld. AR. submitted that in case capital gains are to be charged then deduction Under Section 54 should be given to the assessee.14 Against this. the ld. DR submitted that the assessment was reopened because … the grounds. The gist of revised grounds is as under: (1) Notice Under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act is wholly illegal and without jurisdiction. (2) Investment in free-hold charges of stamp duty in investment in. free