Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the dcs act 2003 section 53 · Page 1 of about 589 results (0.101 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 08 2026

Ntpc Employees Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. vs Registrar Coo ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-08-2026

Subject : Right to Information

Mahesh Kumar Gupta, Retd. DANICS, as an Administrator-cum- Returning Officer under Section 35(5) of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 (hereinafter, ‘DCS Act’) to manage the day- to-day affairs of the Society and to also conduct the elections … dated 10.05.2025 or conversely admit the appointment of an RO under Rule 53 of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2007, Section 35 of the DCS … itself NEGI W.P.(C) 18454/2025 Page 3 of 13contains the reasons for exercising the powers under Section 35(5) of the DCS Act for appointment of administrator. Respondent no.l is using the pleadings in the petition to substantiate his order.4. It

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2019

Sheetal Vihar Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. And Ors. Vs.the R ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-05-2019

Subject : Miscellaneous

elected on 11.02.2018 as President and Secretary, respectively, of the society, violating the section 25(b) and 35(6) of DCS Act 2003. In view of the above, it is to inform that the matter was submitted before the higher authorities … Vihar Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. held on 11.02.2018, was in violation of Rule 22(1) read with Rule 53 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, 2007 and, thus, was illegal. The order dated 25.02.2019 in its entirety

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2005

A. Ravishankar Prasad, A. Sai Vs. Prasad Productions Private

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : Sep-01-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)135CompCas416

the Company for the year ended 31.03.2003, copy of which was available with the petitioners only in June, 2003 and there was no occasion for the petitioners to have knowledge about the investments made in Prasad Media … company. Mrs. U.A. Sumathy v. Dig Vijay Chit Fund (P.) Ltd. (1983) 53 CC 493 - to show that no investigation could be ordered merely … company petition under Sections 235, 397, 398, Schedule XI read with Sections 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") alleging against the respondents, the following acts of oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of … Prasad Productions Private Limited ("the Company") have filed this company petition under Sections 235, 397, 398, Schedule XI read with Sections 402 and 403 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 17 2005

Bombay Environmental Action Group, a Society Registered Under the Soci ... Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-17-2005

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(7), 2(9A), 2(12), 22, 22A, 29, 31, 31(5), 33, 37, 37(1), 37(1A), 37(1AA), 37(2), 38, 50, 58(1), 125, 126, 126(1), 127, 128 and 149; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1915 - Sections 3; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1954 - Sections 7; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1955; Mysore Town and Country Planning Act, 1961; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Article 48A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 31, 47, 48A, 51A, 141, 142, 226 and 368; Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1904-1952;Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 1, 52, 52(4), 53(1), 56, 57, 58, 58(1), 58(2), 58(3), 58(4), 58(5), 58(6), 58(7), 58(8), 59(9) and 62(3); Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearan

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR574; (2005)107BOMLR337; (2006)4CompLJ117(Bom)

as amended in 2001.b) Assuming that the Petitioners interpretation is accepted, then whether the clarification dated 28th March, 2003 effects an amendment to amended DCR 58, which is not permissible under DCR 62(3)?c) Assuming the Respondents interpretation … cope up and for almost a week the entire city was completely crippled.2. The first Petitioner Bombay Environmental Action Group is a public charitable trust duly registered and also a registered society. Its aims and objects are, … 58 means, then whether the amendment to DCR 58 is permissible under Section 37 of the MRTP Act?d) Assuming the amendment to DCR 58 was … NTC-MN by another order also dated 25th July, 2002 in Case No. 536/92. A computation of the surplus land and its value is set out

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2008

Balaji Distilleries Ltd. Vs. the Secretary to Government, State of Tam ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-17-2008

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1), 5(1), 13(4), 13A, 15 to 22, 22(1), 22(5), 22A and 25; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 17; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Regulations - Regulation 19 and 19(5); Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959; Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1989; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 5 and 13(4); Companies Act, 1956; Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947; Gujarat Sales Tax Act; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948; Uttar Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act, 1890; Andhra Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act, 1864

Reported in : (2008)17VST59(Mad)

10, 2007, as being arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the provisions of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 and the proceedings of the fourth respondent to seek taking of any coercive steps against the petitioner … the project was delayed and finally, the company completed the brewery project and commenced commercial operation in May, 2003.4. The petitioner has further submitted that they have capitalised the plant, machinery and building, etc., of the brewery … The petitioner has further submitted that as per the mandatory requirement of Section 3(1)(o) read with Section 15 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) … for the month of March 2007 and the VAT liability of Rs. 53.07 crores. The basis for rejection of the request to await further orders

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2024

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-08-2024

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time … Reports Subodh Kumar Singh Rathour v. Chief Executive Officer [2024] 7 SCR 532 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1682; Province of Bombay v. Khushaldas Advani

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2013

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-29-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line … of 1910) as it stood before such repeal shall continue to be in force till the regulations under section 53 of this Act are made. (d) all rules made under subsection (1) of section 69 of the Electricity

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2016

Commissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai Vs. P. Sinnasamy and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-23-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

a place and everything is in its place." (xi) In Balram Kumawat v. Union of India reported in 2003 (7) SCC 628, the Supreme Court held that, Contextual reading is a well-known proposition of interpretation of statute. … adjudging confiscation shall take and hold possession of the confiscated goods. ............ 53. ..........One of the important aspects to be taken note by the authorities … (Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, against the Final Order No.455 of 2007, dated 20.04.2007, on the file of Customs, Excise and Service

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2006

Sebi Vs. Galaxy Broking Limited

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Jan-24-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

Galaxys books Connection 603/B, Shree Vishal Complex, Narsing lane, Malad (West) Mumbai- 400064 Co- acquired Millennium Cybertech in 2003 -B, Empire Building, Cumballa Hill, Kemps Corner, Mumbai- 400 036 Co- acquired Millennium Cybertech in 2003 633/634 ,PJ … been conducted by SEBI, BSE and NSE. Based on the findings of these preliminary investigations SEBI has taken action under the powers vested in it under Sections 11B and 11(4)(b)of the SEBI Act 1992 in cases where … investigations SEBI has taken action under the powers vested in it under Sections 11B and 11(4)(b)of the SEBI Act 1992 in cases where the price … Engineering3 Fast Track 20,94,129 75,68,991 96,63,120 12,82,42,598 7.53 Entertainment4 Mega 20,40,655 33,58,225 53,98,880 12,24,08,704 4.40 Corporation5 Prraneta 41,135 13,84,656 14,25,791 12,89,43,088 1.10 Industries6 Shukun 1555074

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2012

Malad Kokil Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and Another Vs. the Mode ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-07-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

learned Counsel submits that the learned trial Judge has totally misinterpreted the so called settlement dated 30th August, 2003. The learned Counsel submits that the said settlement has to be read in conjunction with various other documents … It is the contention of the plaintiff-society that after they pursued the matter under the Right to Information Act, they came to know about the Commencement Certificate granted in favour of the defendants by the Corporation on … in the property within the period mentioned in the agreement executed under Section 4 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as … regard to these aspects while deciding an application for retention under Section 53(3) read with Sections 44, 45 and Section 46 of the said Act.”

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial