Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the dcs act 2003 section 50 · Page 1 of about 2,564 results (0.218 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 29 2016

Adarsh Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. A Society registered under Maharash ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-29-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

with Rule 5(3) and (4) of the E.P. Rules, the Central Government issued Notification on 22.04.2003 (for short 2003 Notification ) as it was of the opinion that the 1991 Notification should be amended with a view … (marked as E-F-G-H) and partly included in BEST Depot (marked as C-D-E-F). In exercise of powers vested under Section 50(1) of the M.R.andT.P. Act, Government of Maharashtra issued Notification dated 03.03.2006 sanctioning the proposal of deletion of reservation

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 2011

Chattisgarh State Power Distribution Co. Ltd. Daganiya, Raipur Vs. Ara ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Feb-24-2011

Subject : MRTP

filed a petition in Petition No.2/2009 before the State Commission under Section 86(1)(f) and 86(1)(k) of the Electricity Act, 2003 with two prayers, i.e., (i) for the direction to the licensee, i.e. Electricity Board, to permit reduction of … Agreement of supply between the Appellant and the Respondent No.1, the Chattisgarh Supply Code notified in terms of Section 50 of the Act deals with such unforeseen circumstances as contemplated under Clause 12.10 and Clause 12.11 of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2025

M/S. Jayalakshmi Alloys India vs the Chairman,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-18-2025

his Letter No.EE?O&M/NGM/DM/F.Theft/D.No.265/11 dated 2.3.2011, and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and against the provisions of Electricity Act, 2003 and Electricity Supply Code 2004.For Petitioner : Mr.Janarthanan for Mr.K.Seshadri For Respondents : Mr.P.Kumaresan, Additional Advocate General Assisted … the same and if the petitioner fails to pay the assessment amount, consequential proceedings would be initiated under Sections 135 & 136 of the Electricity Act, 2003. However, in order to safeguard the interest of the respondent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 30 2025

P.Balakrishnan, vs the Tamil Nadu Generation and

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-30-2025

Revised Scales of Pay (Officers' Regulations), 2009, in exercise of its power under Section 185 of the Electricity Act, 2003, revising the wages with effect from 01.12.2007. In terms of the said regulations, 2009, the officers were given … such option. Further, in the case of employees/officers who moved to Selection Grade/Special Grade on or after 01.12.2007, l.e., after fixation of pay in the revised scale with effect from 1.12.2007, their pay shall be fixed on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2026

Mr. Roshan Rai vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-24-2026

the learned Single Judge it is appropriate to advert to - 40 -Sections 70 and 73 of the Act, 2003. Section 70 provides for constitution of Central Electricity Authority which is respondent No.42 herein. Section 73 which defines functions … the appropriate Government namely respondent No.41. In furtherance to the said essential function, administrative and executive functions, - 50 -which are ancillary to the essential function, namely laying of overhead lines as provided under Section 68 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2025

Torrent Solar Power Private Limited vs Power Grid Koppal Gadag

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Dec-15-2025

said to have granted prior approval to the respondent - Power Grid under Section 68(1) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’ for short) for installation of overhead transmission lines under the transmission scheme … the nature of certiorari quashing and setting aside the letters dated 01/04/2025 number reference bearing by SRTS- II/PKGT L/Gadag TLC/2024-25/273 (Annexure- S), the letter dated 07/02/2025 bearing reference number PKGTL-Gadag/TLC/Torrent/255 (Annexure-P) sent Respondent to the Petitioner asking

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2012

Susme Builders Private Limited Vs. Om Namo Sujlam Suflam Co-operative ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-03-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

notice of motion has been taken out by the plaintiffs praying for an order, restraining the defendants from acting upon the termination of the aforesaid agreements and/or creating any third party rights in respect of the suit … and, therefore, the contention in that regard is without substance. The learned Counsel relying on the provisions of Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act submits that since the plaintiff has an interest in the property i.e. … of the said area on yearly rent of not more than Rs. 50,000/- It has been stated that the Society will sign and execute such

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2012

Mumbai District Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Co-operative Bank Employees ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-19-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Steel Board and Anr. 2001 III CLR 560 (SC). (21) Arjun Dada Gadge Vs. Mallappa G. Chougule, AIR 2003 Bombay 441 (HC-Bom.). (22) Management of Sonepat Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Ajit Singh 2005 I LLJ 1122 … of the Labour Court was passed on an Interim Application under Section 119 (D) of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as "BIR Act") filed by the Respondent-Union seeking an order to restrain Respondent-Bank from … (4) Shanti Rayon Mills Vs. Mill Mazdoor Sabha, 1954 I LLJ (Bom) 502 L.A.T. (Bom). (5) Chaganlal Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Chalisgaon Girni Kamgar

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 2015

Dew Concrete Ties Private Limi Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-24-2015

Subject : Education

assessment made and the petitioner was directed to pay Rs. 11,12,600/- under section 126 (5) of the Electricity Act, 2003 2. Sans unnecessary particular, the facts of the case is that petitioner took HT Industrial connection from the … stated that on 07.02.2006, a surprise inspection conducted in the premises of the petitioner and two seals of L.V.-cum- C.T. Box were found broken. Thereafter, an FIR lodged and the Board provisionally assessed that the petitioner liable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2018

Hari Ram vs.lt. Governor, Nct of Delhi and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-06-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

W.P.(C) 9821/2015 Page 1 of 5 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as ‘2013 Act’) as neither physical possession of the subject land has been taken … Territory of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘the subject land’), are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the W.P.(C) 9821/2015 Page 1 of 5 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, … ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Ms.Kajri Gupta, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial