Advanced Search Results

Bimal Kumar Jana vs Santa Dey & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

order dated 29th May 2015 it was heldthat the period of 180 days prescribed under Section 86(3) of the DCS Act, 2003 is mandatory and begins from the date of receipt of the expulsion resolution by the RCS. Failure of … the Managing Committee (‘MC’) meeting dated 17th July 2011 were conducted in gross violation of Rule 46(4), Rule 48(3), and Rule 60(4) of the DCS Rules 2007, including lack of quorum and denial of due process. WP(C)

Krishna Kumar Rawat and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)210CTR(Raj)553; RLW2007(4)Raj3133

a newly introduced provision, has been made effective prospectively from 1st April, 2003. The learned Counsel for the appellant relied on the judgment of Hon'ble … stamp duty in respect of such transfer, the value so adopted or assessed shall, for the purpose of Section 48, be deemed to be the full value of the consideration received or accruing as a result of such … was agreed between the parties that they shall obtain a certificate in Form No. 37-1 of the IT Act and within one month thereafter the sale deed shall be got executed. According to the prospective buyers however

S.Chandramohan Vs. 1.The State

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

from testing correctness of the decision. It is submitted that the fourth respondent Corporation having already resolved during 2003 to return the land and forwarded the same to the Government, it is only the Government, which has … Madurai, proposed to construct a depot and for which purpose land acquisition proceedings were initiated under the Central Act to acquire the petitioner's land. The land acquisition proceedings had been completed and the land has vested with … is submitted by the learned counsel that without passing an order under Section 48(B) of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter, it may be referred to

Mr. Manish Sethi and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1984 - Sections 4, 5A, 6, 6(3), 9 and 48; Development Act; Delhi Land Reforms Act - Sections 81; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 155(2008)DLT122

Mandamus for quashing the notification issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1984 dated 19th February, 2003 No. F.8(12)/2002/L&D;/LA/18646, declaration under Section 6 dated 16th February, 2004 bearing No. F.8(12)/2002/L&D;/LA/25144 & Award No. 2/2004-05/Distt/Northeast in … land') and a writ of certiorari seeking a direction from this Court for disposal of the application under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act for denotification of the abovementioned land pending before the competent authority.2. The facts

Smt. Mina Deogun Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)117TTJ(Kol.)121

have gone up more than the general rate of inflation. The cost inflation index which is prescribed under Section 48 is based on the "wholesale price index" and during the period 1981 and 2003 the cost inflation index … not striking down the reference to the Valuation Officer made by the AO under Section 55A of the Act and was not justified in upholding the reference under Section 55A(2)(b) even though the said provision was not

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … (2003) 6 SCC 56; Kamatchi Amman Constructions v. Railways [2010] 10 SCR 487 : (2010) 8 SCC 767; Shree Subhlaxmi Fabrics (P) Ltd. v. Chand … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time

A.Sivaprakasam Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

case, ultimately dismissed the said W.P.No.15839/2013.15. It is to be noted that Section 43 of Tamil Nadu Electricity Act, 2003 under the caption that due to supply on request runs as follows: ".43.Duty to supply on request.-(1) [Save

Commissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai Vs. P. Sinnasamy and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

a place and everything is in its place." (xi) In Balram Kumawat v. Union of India reported in 2003 (7) SCC 628, the Supreme Court held that, Contextual reading is a well-known proposition of interpretation of statute. … section (b) to Section 111 of the Act covers the persons involved. 48. Section 123 of the Act, deals with burden of proof in certain … (Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, against the Final Order No.455 of 2007, dated 20.04.2007, on the file of Customs, Excise and Service

Dy. Commissioner Vs. Ramesh Kumari and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 19, 20, 21, 21(1), 21(2), 21(3), 23, 30, 36 and 42; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379, 427 and 447; Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Rules, 1959 - Rules 3(2), 4(2) and 6

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT133

of 1997 by the DC was disposed of by the FC by the impugned order dated 27th June 2003. The FC came to the conclusion that with the disposal of the earlier revision petition by the FC … 1986 a notification was issued under Section 14 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 ('Holdings Act') by the competent authority commencing the process of consolidation of land in the Village Kapashera

The State Vs. Bal Kishan @ Bali

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 157(1), 161, 174, 175 and 313

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3508; 130(2006)DLT242; 2006(89)DRJ427

witnesses were asked whether those chappals belonged to the deceased or assailants. 48. Secondly it is surprising to note that the respondent-accused did not furnish … J. 1. The respondent/accused was exonerated from the charges under Sections 302 of I.P.C. and 25/27/54/59 of Arms Act by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge vide his order dated 24th December, 1981. Aggrieved by that order, the … a compelling reason for interference. This position has been recently reiterated in Joseph v. State of Kerala : 2003CriLJ813 , Devatha Venkataswamy @ Rangaiah v. Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. : 2003CriLJ4332 , State of Punjab … J.M. Malik, J. 1. The respondent/accused was exonerated from the charges under Sections 302 of I.P.C. and 25/27/54/59 of Arms Act by the Learned Additional