Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the dcs act 2003 section 46 · Page 1 of about 731 results (0.076 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 12 2026

Bimal Kumar Jana vs Santa Dey & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-12-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

order dated 29th May 2015 it was heldthat the period of 180 days prescribed under Section 86(3) of the DCS Act, 2003 is mandatory and begins from the date of receipt of the expulsion resolution by the RCS. Failure of … June 2010and the Managing Committee (‘MC’) meeting dated 17th July 2011 were conducted in gross violation of Rule 46(4), Rule 48(3), and Rule 60(4) of the DCS Rules 2007, including lack of quorum and denial of due

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2014

Bihar Industries Association Sinha Library Road Vs. Bihar Electricity ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : Mar-11-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

appellants learned counsel on this issue, the learned counsel for the respondent no.3 has contended that according to Section 46 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the licensees are authorized to recover its expenses reasonably for providing electric line … Surendra Kumar, Judicial Member. 1. This is an Appeal under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 filed by the appellant Bihar Industries Association against the order dated 15.03.2013 passed by the Bihar Electricity Regulatory

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2013

T.M.Prakash Vs. the District Collector

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-27-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

2003 and the Tamil Nadu Distribution Code, 2004, framed thereunder, in exercise of the powers conferring under Sections 46 and 86 of the Electricity Act, 2003, casts a mandatory duty, on the licencee to provide electricity supply … the petitioners are residing at Polur Road, 7th Street, Thiruvannamalai District.4. Referring to Section 43 of the Electricity Act, 2003, which mandates the 2nd respondent to provide electricity supply, to an occupier of the land or premises and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 19 2012

Mumbai District Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Co-operative Bank Employees ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-19-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Steel Board and Anr. 2001 III CLR 560 (SC). (21) Arjun Dada Gadge Vs. Mallappa G. Chougule, AIR 2003 Bombay 441 (HC-Bom.). (22) Management of Sonepat Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Ajit Singh 2005 I LLJ 1122 … the impugned restraint orders on the ground that the Bank effected an illegal change within the meaning of Section 46 of the BIR Act by outsourcing the alleged permanent and perennial nature of work and acted in breach

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2013

Meccaa Prime Tannery Vs. Chairman of Tamilnadu Electricity Board

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-20-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Regulatory Commission made Tamilnadu Electricity Distribution Code by exercising powers under Section 86 and 46 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 22(1) and 29 of the Electricity Act 2003 enable the State Regulatory Commission to fix the tariff rates.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2011

Runu Ghosh Vs. C.B.i

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

the synthesized version worked out to ` 3,35,639/-. U.S. Prasad, DDG (PF) in his note of 25th August 2003 (Ex. PW-3/K-58) indicated that the price of the crystal version should be ` 3,35,639 - ` 37,170 = … Section 13(1) (d) and Section 13(2) Crl.A.Nos. 482/02, 509/02 and 536/02 Page 1 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and convicting Mr. Sukh Ram and Ms. Runu Ghosh, the Appellants in Crl. A. Nos.536. and 482 … omission to frame charges, it was argued that by virtue of Section 464, Cr.PC, unless the Appellant, or Revisionist, before a higher court, proves that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2024

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-08-2024

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time … Transport (P) Ltd. [2009] 13 SCR 510 : (2009) 3 SCC (Civ) 460; [2024] 11 S.C.R. 2181 Central Organisation for Railway Electrification v. M/s ECI

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2011

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-06-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

manner, and in general a discretion must be exercised only by the authority to which it is committed. 46. In support of the argument that the Commission while rejecting the petition for amendment of the Regulations so … found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2013

Yeshwantrao D. Chowgule (Since Deceased, Through L.R.S) and Others Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : May-10-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Comunidade, in Civil Suit No. 100/1981, was also dismissed and Comunidade had filed First Appeal No. 321 of 2003 against the judgment and decree dated 09/06/2003 in Civil Suit No. 100/1981. However, after filing the Appeal, Comunidade … others V. Dominion of India and others” reported in [(1984) 3 SCC 46] and submitted that the suit could not have been defeated on mere … No. 68 of 1973 in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Quepem on 8/01/1973, against the illegal actions of said Government officers. The learned J.M.F.C. dismissed the said complaint, on the ground that it was property … said Criminal complaint got dismissed for default. Chowgules then gave notice under Section 80 of C.P.C. to the Government. Shri V. K. Chowdhari, the Dy.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2016

Commissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai Vs. P. Sinnasamy and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-23-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

a place and everything is in its place." (xi) In Balram Kumawat v. Union of India reported in 2003 (7) SCC 628, the Supreme Court held that, Contextual reading is a well-known proposition of interpretation of statute. … Act for carrying out the purposes of that Chapter have been contravened." 46. Section 112 deals with the penalty for improper importation of goods, etc., … (Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, against the Final Order No.455 of 2007, dated 20.04.2007, on the file of Customs, Excise and Service

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial