Advanced Search Results
Power Trading Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Central Electricity Regula ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Feb-18-2009
Electricity
collection of service charge as per the direction have been continued even before the enactment of the Electricity Act, 2003 as well as before the fixation of the Trading Margin Regulations, 2006 introduced by the Central Commission. Therefore, … the sale or purchase of goods. 23.7 2002 Vol.6 SCC 600 (para 44 and 45), Haridas Exports Vs. All India Float Glass Manufacturers’ Association 23.8 … Regulations. D) The Central Commission has wrongly assumed jurisdiction over the cross-border international trading which is beyond the Sections 1(2) and 79(1)(j) and Section 76(1) of the Act and it is also violative of Section 2(26) of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd Vs. Ppn Power G ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
Feb-22-2013
Land Acquisition
Entitlement of the Appellant to Rebate (b) Jurisdiction of the State Commission u/s 86 (1) (f) of the Act, 2003; (c) First In First Out method; for adjustment of payment; (d) Limitation, delay and latches; (e) Bar under … in force for the time being as to the limitation of suits”. 44. Section 60 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 provides that the Power … Date an invoice (“invoice”) for all amounts accrued in the preceding month under the Tariff and other applicable sections in this agreement for the estimated FC, VCC and incentive charges, which will come due during such month.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd Vs. Asset Reconstruction CoIndia Ltd
Chennai
Sep-12-2013
Land Acquisition
(n) Therefore, when SPIC Petrochemicals Limited committed default in repayment, ICICI Bank filed an application in O.A.No.9 of 2003 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Mumbai. In the said application, the Debts Recovery Tribunal appointed a Receiver by … possession of the land of the extent of 168.35 acres in terms of Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, on 13.5.2010. (u) But the Official Liquidator later took possession of the property on 14.5.2010, in pursuance of … is also void in view of the negative expression contained in Section 44-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894; (iii) that the order permitting ARCIL
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dy. Commissioner Vs. Ramesh Kumari and ors.
Delhi
Dec-05-2008
Property
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 19, 20, 21, 21(1), 21(2), 21(3), 23, 30, 36 and 42; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379, 427 and 447; Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Rules, 1959 - Rules 3(2), 4(2) and 6
156(2009)DLT133
of 1997 by the DC was disposed of by the FC by the impugned order dated 27th June 2003. The FC came to the conclusion that with the disposal of the earlier revision petition by the FC … 1986 a notification was issued under Section 14 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 ('Holdings Act') by the competent authority commencing the process of consolidation of land in the Village Kapashera … Kumari. Likewise land measuring 5 bighas and 11 biswas in Khasra Nos. 44/21 min and 49/1 was purchased by Deepak Resorts and Hotels Pvt. Ltd.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCentral Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...
Supreme Court of India
Nov-08-2024
Arbitration
[2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641
and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time … Singh v. Champat Singh [1970] 2 SCR 903 : (1969) 3 SCC 447; Grindlays Bank Ltd. v. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal [1981] 2 SCR 341
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Malek Vs. State of West Bengal and Others
Kolkata
Jun-04-2012
Land Acquisition
the business of distributorship under the provisions of the West Bengal Public Distribution System, (Maintenance and Control) Order 2003. The petitioner, along with one Monohar Chandra Halder initially had been appointed as a modified ration (M.R.) distributor … Distribution System (Maintenance and Control) Order was promulgated under the provisions of Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act 1955. By this Control Order, distributorship of this nature was brought within its ambit, specifying the manner of … to initiation of suo motu proceeding by a Revenue Officer under Section 44(2a) of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. Questions arose in this
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskModi Rubber Ltd. Vs. Guardian International Corp.
Delhi
Mar-28-2007
SICA
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 16 and 18; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 82; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 6, 6.1, 9, 11, 17, 18, 19 to 24, 25 and 36; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 32, 39 and 56; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 14, 14(1), 16, 21, 23, 41, 41(1) and 42; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 18, 20 and 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148A - Order 38, Rule 5 - Order 39; LCIA Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 16 and 226
2007(2)ARBLR133(Delhi); 141(2007)DLT822
of the reserves and surplus considerably enhanced. The petitioner has placed reliance on a letter dated 19th November, 2003 written by Guardian to Mr. Vinay Kumar Modi as Chairman of the joint venture GGL adverting to restructuring … on account of sickness of its partner in a joint venture under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, the underlying shareholders agreement between the parties is rendered frustrated and incapable of implementation. Consequently, the petitioner cannot … by Guardian shows that it has been captioned as an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The arbitration clause which … It has been pointed out by MRL that the financial institutions hold 44.25% equity in MRL. Before any scheme of revival could be submitted to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA and Others (Appellants) (Fc) and Others Vs. Secretary of State for t ...
House of Lords
Dec-08-2005
Right to Information
appointed to represent. 7. The rules applicable to these appeals are the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Procedure) Rules 2003 (SI 2003/1034). Part 3 of the Rules governs appeals under section 25 of the 2001 Act. In response … of record established by statute, when hearing an appeal under section 25 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 by a person certified and detained under sections 21 and 23 of that Act, receive evidence which … once the closed material has been disclosed to him (rule 36). Rule 44(3) provides that SIAC "may receive evidence that would not be admissible in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Kumar Nandecha vs M/S. Aithent Technologies Pvt. Ltd..
Delhi
Jun-16-2026
Land Acquisition
month, 30% of his gross salary amounting to Rs.26,550/- per month, was deferred from April, 2002 till March, 2003. The deferred component aggregating to Rs.3,18,600/-, was agreed to be paid on 01.04.2003. RFA 649/2024 Page 2 of … to the terms of Ex. PW-1/D1, would be hit by Sections 91 and 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The Appellant/Plaintiff had failed to establish any contractual arrangement whereby the reduced component of salary was to … E N TNEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.1. The present Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with OrderXLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
May-06-2011
Land Acquisition
found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue … 29.17 56.75 92.46 61.99 3. Bargi 69.16 43.30 38.32 48.78 4 Bansagar-1 96.46 66.03 80.92 80.05 5 Banasagar-II 44.75 43.43 47.42 45.26 6 Banasagar-III 72.36 49.20 60.97 60.03 7 Banasagar-IV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 Birsingpur 87.50
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »