Advanced Search Results

A.Sivaprakasam Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

case, ultimately dismissed the said W.P.No.15839/2013.15. It is to be noted that Section 43 of Tamil Nadu Electricity Act, 2003 under the caption that due to supply on request runs as follows: ".43.Duty to supply on request.-(1) [Save

Rajendra R.Mehta Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

pursuant to the said order, the Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, a statutory body created under the Electricity Act, 2003, has amended Regulation 27 of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004 and the amended provision is extracted … hand. ".27. Requisitions for Supply of Energy:- (i) The provision regarding the duty of Licensee as detailed in Section 43 1(of the Act) to supply electricity on request is reproduced below:- (1) Save as otherwise provided in this

V.Selvi Vs. Tangedco Assistant Engineer

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

not provided any alternate way.3. The petitioner has further submitted that as per Section 43 of the Electricity Act, 2003, he is entitled to seek for electricity service connection, to his residential house. As electricity, is an indispensable

Shri Kunal Bhalotia Vs. Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited Through Its ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

for a direction to the respondents to pay penalty in terms of Section 43 (3) of the Electricity Act, 2003 for their failure to provide electric connection to the petitioner within 30 days of the date of application

Best Cotton Mills, (Unit of Best Corporation Limited), Dharapuram Repr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

that under the provision of regarding the duty of licensee as detailed in the section 43 of Electricity Act, 2003 to supply electricity on request by the consumer, and as per clause 27(1) of chapter 6 - Terms

Vijay Mohan Prasad Vs. The Jharkhand State Electricity Board Through I ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

writ petition on the ground of availability of statutory remedy of appeal under Section 43(6) of the Electricity Act, 2003. It is stated that on 10.09.2012, the premises of the petitioner was inspected during which it was found

Escotel Mobile Communication Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : (2007)148PLR170; (2007)9VST382(P& H)

Act'). Subsequently, it has been registered, after the repeal of the Act, under the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for brevity, 'the VAT Act'). The assessee-petitioner is engaged in the business of mobile telecommunication and is a … value of SIM card, activation charges could not be included.3. The assessee-petitioner placing reliance on the provisions of Section 43 of the Act and Rules 35 and 38 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975 (for brevity,

In the Matter Of: Madhya Pradesh Power Trading Company Ltd Vs. Madhya ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

seeking for the approval and adoption of tariff for procurement of power under section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 from two bidders namely Reliance Power Limited and Essar Power Limited who had submitted offer for supply of … National Electricity Policy and tariff policy: Provided that the terms and conditions for determination of tariff under section 43-A of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, the Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 and the enactments specified in the

Tulip Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Trade Wings Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Arbitration

recovery of the outstanding loan against the third respondent before Debt Recovery Tribunal, Delhi sometime in the year 2003. According to the petitioners, the petitioner no.2 using his good Officers had managed to obtain a one time … on the basis of these observations. It is submitted that in para 43 of the impugned order, the learned Arbitrator has found that the issue … 6/07/2013 passed by the learned Arbitrator upholding an objection raised under Section 16(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('The Act', for short) and thereby rejecting the claim filed by the petitioners. 2. The facts necessary

Sterlining Holiday Resorts vs the Assistant Commissioner

Court : Chennai

it was contended that there can be no doubt about the recognition of deferred income in view of Section 43 CB of the Income Tax Act. Also, it is brought to our attention the judgment of the ITAT,