Advanced Search Results

M/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Appellant’s Captive Power Plant (CPP) to consumers other than the captive use is not permissible under Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and accordingly the Appellant should either take distribution license from the Commission under section 12 or seek exemption … ancillary units, therefore, it would not be subjected to payment of any cross-subsidy surcharge and additional surcharge under Section 42(2)and 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003.However, during proceedings before the Commission in that matter, the Appellant had given

M/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

Appellants Captive Power Plant (CPP) to consumers other than the captive use is not permissible under Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and accordingly the Appellant should either take distribution license from the Commission under section 12 or seek exemption … ancillary units, therefore, it would not be subjected to payment of any cross-subsidy surcharge and additional surcharge under Section 42(2)and 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003.However, during proceedings before the Commission in that matter, the Appellant had given

Susme Builders Private Limited Vs. Om Namo Sujlam Suflam Co-operative ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

the prejudice of plaintiff's interest. The learned Counsel further relying on the provisions of Section 41(e) read with Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 submits that plaintiff is entitled to an injunction as prayed for. 6.

A.Sivaprakasam Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Tamil Nadu [2005 (5) CTC133.17. Indeed, Regulation 25 of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004 and Section 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003 cast a duty on the Electricity Board to provide supply of electricity to … case, ultimately dismissed the said W.P.No.15839/2013.15. It is to be noted that Section 43 of Tamil Nadu Electricity Act, 2003 under the caption that due to supply on request runs as follows: ".43.Duty to supply on request.-(1) [Save

Vandana Vidyut Ltd. Vs. Chhattisgarh State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL738

to apply for open excess and without liability to pay surcharge under Section 42(2) proviso of The Electricity Act, 2003.3. As both the appeals are connected and the points raised in both the appeals are identical, proceedings being

The Superintending Engineer vs Khivaraj Tech Park Pvt Ltd

Court : Chennai

After the final order passed by the Consumer Grievance RedressalForum, Section 42 (6) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Act, 2003 contemplates that any consumer, who is aggrieved by non-redressal of his grievances under sub- section (5) may make

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line … or lower level or for the alteration of its form; and the order so made shall be final.34. Section 42 of the Electricity (Supply) Act,1948, deals with Powers to Board for placing wires, poles and the same is

Naresh Lachmandas Aswani Vs. Haridas Alias Hardas Lachmandas and Other ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 2007 in Bombay City Civil Court at Dindoshi for cancellation of Letter of Intent dated 12th October, 2003 issued by the Secretary, Slum Rehabilitation and Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as 'SRA') for a direction to … of 2011) in this suit for deciding the issue of bar of inherent jurisdiction of this court under section 42 of the Maharashtra Slum Area (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 as also issue of limitation as jurisdictional

Mumbai District Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Co-operative Bank Employees ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Steel Board and Anr. 2001 III CLR 560 (SC). (21) Arjun Dada Gadge Vs. Mallappa G. Chougule, AIR 2003 Bombay 441 (HC-Bom.). (22) Management of Sonepat Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Ajit Singh 2005 I LLJ 1122 … and posts without revising the staffing pattern and issuing notice of change in view of the provisions of Section 42(1) read with items 1 and 2 of Schedule II of BIR Act and the Bank is required to

Amar Jeet & Ors. vs Registrar Cooperative Societies & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

revised the maintenance charges without approval of the General body in contravention of Section 89 and 93 of the DCS Act, 2003 and Rule 102(2) & (3) of the DCS Rules, 2007. Further, the inclusion of non-primary members in the … and the Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, 2007. The Committee has violated the directions issued by this office under Section 42 of the Act, conducted the Special General Body Meeting in defiance of official orders, and unilaterally revised the