Advanced Search Results

Janhit Manch and Bhagvanji Raiyani Vs. the State of Maharashtra Throug ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2(19), 2(9A), 9, 22, 31, 31(5), 37, 37(1), 37(IB), 38, 44, 45, 46, 54, 55, 56, 64, 113A, 126, 126(1), 135, 136, 152 and 158; Negotiable Instruments Act; Sea Customs Act - Sections 78A and 178A; Limitation Act; Slum Clearance Act, 1971; Bombay Metropolitan Region Development Authority Act - Sections 13; BMC Act - Sections 144B and 354(AAA); Environmental Protection Act; Water Pollution Act; Air Act; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11, 91 and 141 - Order 2, Rule 2; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 6; Draft Development Rules, 1989; Development Control Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19(1), 21, 31(2), 32, 178A and 226; Development Control Regulations for Greater Bomba

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR110; 2007(1)BomCR329

by the United Nations Development Agency is approx. 4 acres per 1000 population. The demand for water in 2003 was 3500 million litres per day but the Respondent No. 2 could supply only 2950 million litres per … to be seen in the perspective that all development plans have a limited life span of 20 years (Section 38 of MRTP Act). The period of this plan is substantially over and before the next development plan is

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line

Bombay Environmental Action Group, a Society Registered Under the Soci ... Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(7), 2(9A), 2(12), 22, 22A, 29, 31, 31(5), 33, 37, 37(1), 37(1A), 37(1AA), 37(2), 38, 50, 58(1), 125, 126, 126(1), 127, 128 and 149; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1915 - Sections 3; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1954 - Sections 7; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1955; Mysore Town and Country Planning Act, 1961; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Article 48A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 31, 47, 48A, 51A, 141, 142, 226 and 368; Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1904-1952;Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 1, 52, 52(4), 53(1), 56, 57, 58, 58(1), 58(2), 58(3), 58(4), 58(5), 58(6), 58(7), 58(8), 59(9) and 62(3); Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearan

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR574; (2005)107BOMLR337; (2006)4CompLJ117(Bom)

as amended in 2001.b) Assuming that the Petitioners interpretation is accepted, then whether the clarification dated 28th March, 2003 effects an amendment to amended DCR 58, which is not permissible under DCR 62(3)?c) Assuming the Respondents interpretation … nature to a sanctioned development plan can only be made by a revision of the development plan under Section 38 of the Act, or by resort to Section 33 which provides preparation of plans for an area or

K.Rakkianna Gounder Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 14.05.2003 District Revenue Officer, Salem Pronounced by me in the Open Court. This 14th day of May 2003. Sd/- on 14.05.2003 Special Tahsildar (L.A.) Neighbourhood Scheme, Salem 636 008. H2/11310/03, dated .05.2003 The Draft Award for … for R1 to R3 Mr.R.V.Babu for R4 ORDER Acquisition proceedings initiated under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, issued in G.O.Ms.No.146, Housing and Urban Development and G.O.Ms.No.147, Housing and Urban Development (I.A.IV(2), dated 29.03.2000, published in

Bimal Kumar Jana vs Santa Dey & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

order dated 29th May 2015 it was heldthat the period of 180 days prescribed under Section 86(3) of the DCS Act, 2003 is mandatory and begins from the date of receipt of the expulsion resolution by the RCS. Failure of

Mumbai District Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Co-operative Bank Employees ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Steel Board and Anr. 2001 III CLR 560 (SC). (21) Arjun Dada Gadge Vs. Mallappa G. Chougule, AIR 2003 Bombay 441 (HC-Bom.). (22) Management of Sonepat Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Ajit Singh 2005 I LLJ 1122 … prepared or sent without consultation of the Union. The Bank has promoted 38 employees to the higher grade with effect from 12-9-2011. The Bank could … of the Labour Court was passed on an Interim Application under Section 119 (D) of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as "BIR Act") filed by the Respondent-Union seeking an order to restrain Respondent-Bank from

M/S. Tci Industries Ltd. and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

application, and it was not till this Courts orders of 8th April 2003 and 25th April 2003 that closure was finally permitted. The Petitioners claim … by the State Government following a statutorily mandated procedure. A development plan must be revised every 20 years (Section 38). Till 1991, development in Mumbai was controlled by the Development Control Rules, 1967 (“the 1967 DC Rules”). The … a sea change. Town and Country Planning in Maharashtra is governed by the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (“the MRTP Act”). That Act requires, inter alia, the designated planning authority - in this case, the

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time … v. Judges Inquiry Committee [2011] 10 SCR 1064 : (2011) 8 SCC 380; Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India [2015] 13 SCR 1

The Commissioner of Income Tax-8, Mumbai and Others Vs. M/s. Sulzer In ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

to Mr. Gupta, contemplate deemed payment of Sales Tax dues. 13. Mr. Gupta submitted that the provisions of section 38 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 (BST) mandate that the amount of tax shall be paid by … Income Tax Appeal No.2871/Mum/2007 and another by the Assessee being Income Tax Appeal No.2944/Mum/2007. The assessment year is 2003-04. These were cross Appeals against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (XIX) dated 19th January, 2007.

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue … Tribunal may deem just and proper” 10. Petition No.8 of 2010 filed by the appellant which is about 388 page petition contains facts and figures station-wise in support of the prayer for relaxation of norms. 11. Of