Advanced Search Results

Janhit Manch and Bhagvanji Raiyani Vs. the State of Maharashtra Throug ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2(19), 2(9A), 9, 22, 31, 31(5), 37, 37(1), 37(IB), 38, 44, 45, 46, 54, 55, 56, 64, 113A, 126, 126(1), 135, 136, 152 and 158; Negotiable Instruments Act; Sea Customs Act - Sections 78A and 178A; Limitation Act; Slum Clearance Act, 1971; Bombay Metropolitan Region Development Authority Act - Sections 13; BMC Act - Sections 144B and 354(AAA); Environmental Protection Act; Water Pollution Act; Air Act; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11, 91 and 141 - Order 2, Rule 2; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 6; Draft Development Rules, 1989; Development Control Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19(1), 21, 31(2), 32, 178A and 226; Development Control Regulations for Greater Bomba

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR110; 2007(1)BomCR329

by the United Nations Development Agency is approx. 4 acres per 1000 population. The demand for water in 2003 was 3500 million litres per day but the Respondent No. 2 could supply only 2950 million litres per … to be seen in the perspective that all development plans have a limited life span of 20 years (Section 38 of MRTP Act). The period of this plan is substantially over and before the next development plan is

Mr. Roshan Rai vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

the learned Single Judge it is appropriate to advert to - 40 -Sections 70 and 73 of the Act, 2003. Section 70 provides for constitution of Central Electricity Authority which is respondent No.42 herein. Section 73 which defines functions … would be barred by res-judicata etc. respondents raised preliminary objections.23. Petitioners' challenge against Project is,firstly, on ground that Section 38 (2) of Act, mandated submission of proposal for inter-state transmission line by CTU; secondly, on ground of validity

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line

Tmt.a.Kowsalya vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Its

Court : Chennai

of 1.78 and 0.01 acres respectively acquired by way of a sale deed registered as Doc. No.6779 of 2003 before the Sub Register Office, Tiruvallur. Originally, the subject lands were agricultural lands, however later the Government converted … respectively for forming part of the proposed A3-A3 100 feet road to have lapsed in the light of Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act,1971 and consequently direct the respondents to pass an appropriate

T. Ezhil Murugan, Vs The Director/Commissioner,

Court : Chennai

petitioners was reserved for the formation of a road under the Detailed Development Plan notified in the year 2003. The petitioners contend that, despite the lapse of more than two decades from the date of such notification, … Kulavanigarpuram village, Melapalayam, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli cityMunicipality Corporation, Tirunelveli District as “PROPOSED ROAD” as lapsed in the light of Section 38 of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. For Petitioners :Mr.R.J.Karthick For R1 and R2 :Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff

Bombay Environmental Action Group, a Society Registered Under the Soci ... Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(7), 2(9A), 2(12), 22, 22A, 29, 31, 31(5), 33, 37, 37(1), 37(1A), 37(1AA), 37(2), 38, 50, 58(1), 125, 126, 126(1), 127, 128 and 149; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1915 - Sections 3; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1954 - Sections 7; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1955; Mysore Town and Country Planning Act, 1961; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Article 48A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 31, 47, 48A, 51A, 141, 142, 226 and 368; Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1904-1952;Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 1, 52, 52(4), 53(1), 56, 57, 58, 58(1), 58(2), 58(3), 58(4), 58(5), 58(6), 58(7), 58(8), 59(9) and 62(3); Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearan

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR574; (2005)107BOMLR337; (2006)4CompLJ117(Bom)

as amended in 2001.b) Assuming that the Petitioners interpretation is accepted, then whether the clarification dated 28th March, 2003 effects an amendment to amended DCR 58, which is not permissible under DCR 62(3)?c) Assuming the Respondents interpretation … nature to a sanctioned development plan can only be made by a revision of the development plan under Section 38 of the Act, or by resort to Section 33 which provides preparation of plans for an area or

K.Rakkianna Gounder Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 14.05.2003 District Revenue Officer, Salem Pronounced by me in the Open Court. This 14th day of May 2003. Sd/- on 14.05.2003 Special Tahsildar (L.A.) Neighbourhood Scheme, Salem 636 008. H2/11310/03, dated .05.2003 The Draft Award for … for R1 to R3 Mr.R.V.Babu for R4 ORDER Acquisition proceedings initiated under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, issued in G.O.Ms.No.146, Housing and Urban Development and G.O.Ms.No.147, Housing and Urban Development (I.A.IV(2), dated 29.03.2000, published in

Bimal Kumar Jana vs Santa Dey & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

order dated 29th May 2015 it was heldthat the period of 180 days prescribed under Section 86(3) of the DCS Act, 2003 is mandatory and begins from the date of receipt of the expulsion resolution by the RCS. Failure of

Mumbai District Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Co-operative Bank Employees ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Steel Board and Anr. 2001 III CLR 560 (SC). (21) Arjun Dada Gadge Vs. Mallappa G. Chougule, AIR 2003 Bombay 441 (HC-Bom.). (22) Management of Sonepat Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Ajit Singh 2005 I LLJ 1122 … prepared or sent without consultation of the Union. The Bank has promoted 38 employees to the higher grade with effect from 12-9-2011. The Bank could … of the Labour Court was passed on an Interim Application under Section 119 (D) of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as "BIR Act") filed by the Respondent-Union seeking an order to restrain Respondent-Bank from

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time … v. Judges Inquiry Committee [2011] 10 SCR 1064 : (2011) 8 SCC 380; Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India [2015] 13 SCR 1