Advanced Search Results

The Capital Cooperative Thrift Credit Society Ltd & Ors. vs Regist ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

elections was declared on 15th December, 2024. 7. Thereafter, claims came to be filed under section 70 of the DCS Act, 2003, by Respondents No. 3 to 15 on the ground that the nominations were wrongly rejected. In the said

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Hydro Power Station and the respondent No. 10 MSEB (Holding Co) and Maharashtra State Transmission Company Limited has 33% share in the Pench Hydro Station, both operated by the appellant. 4. To show the details of the … found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue

Bimal Kumar Jana vs Santa Dey & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

order dated 29th May 2015 it was heldthat the period of 180 days prescribed under Section 86(3) of the DCS Act, 2003 is mandatory and begins from the date of receipt of the expulsion resolution by the RCS. Failure of … NEW DELHI-110078 .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person (through VC).versusSMT. SANTA DEY & ORS.1. SMT. SANTA DEY FLAT NO. 336, DELHI EPDP CGHS LTD. PLOT NO.19, SECTOR-4, DWARKA, NEW DELHI-110078.2. DELHI EPDP CGHS LTD. PLOT NO. 19, SECTOR-4,

Mr. Roshan Rai vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

the learned Single Judge it is appropriate to advert to - 40 -Sections 70 and 73 of the Act, 2003. Section 70 provides for constitution of Central Electricity Authority which is respondent No.42 herein. Section 73 which defines functions … power to issue executive directions that are required for implementation of policies from time to time. Thus, - 33 -he submitted that the impugned order at Annexure-A is not a “delegation of power” but merely a “direction”

Susme Builders Private Limited Vs. Om Namo Sujlam Suflam Co-operative ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

notice of motion has been taken out by the plaintiffs praying for an order, restraining the defendants from acting upon the termination of the aforesaid agreements and/or creating any third party rights in respect of the suit … and, therefore, the contention in that regard is without substance. The learned Counsel relying on the provisions of Section 202 of the Indian Contract Act submits that since the plaintiff has an interest in the property i.e. … Attorney. In the said meeting the further amendment to the DCR No. 33(10) was also considered under which slum rehabilitation authority was constituted. The general

Power Trading Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Central Electricity Regula ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

collection of service charge as per the direction have been continued even before the enactment of the Electricity Act, 2003 as well as before the fixation of the Trading Margin Regulations, 2006 introduced by the Central Commission. Therefore, … or the parties to the agreement are not in India and the agreement may not be registerable under Section 33 being outside India, the agreement nevertheless, being a restrictive trade practice, as a consequence of such an outside

Jolen Inc. Vs. Shobanlal JaIn and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999; ;Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 9, 11, 12, 12(1), 18, 18(1), 21(2) and 33; ;Trade Marks Rules; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : LC2010(2)176

the trademark JOLEN prior to the date of the application. Therefore, the Petitioner could not take advantage of Section 33 of the TM Act 1958.12. As regards the Petitioner's Opposition No. DEL 600 under No. 555920 in respect

Mumbai District Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Co-operative Bank Employees ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Steel Board and Anr. 2001 III CLR 560 (SC). (21) Arjun Dada Gadge Vs. Mallappa G. Chougule, AIR 2003 Bombay 441 (HC-Bom.). (22) Management of Sonepat Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Ajit Singh 2005 I LLJ 1122 … is withdrawn, such Application would not be entertained by the Labour Court. 33. Hearing of the Application shall stand expedited. Upon pronouncement of the judgment, … of the Labour Court was passed on an Interim Application under Section 119 (D) of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as "BIR Act") filed by the Respondent-Union seeking an order to restrain Respondent-Bank from

Eswari vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

and “Impugned Authorization” given by the 2nd respondent to the 4th respondent under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, published in the Gazette of India dated 22.10.2024 with respect to the Power Transmission Project namely “230 kV … SC EHT line on DC tower with AL 59 Moose Conductor for the proposed Senapathi Palayam 230 / 33 KV PSS toPage No.11/613.5. Under these circumstances, when certain landowners objected to the generating company entering their lands

National Highway Authority of India vs Devassy C.M.

Court : Kerala

any individual."(viii) In Indian Railway Construction Co. Ltd. v. Ajay Kumar [AIR 2003 SC 1843 : (2003) 4 SCC 579], at paragraphs No. 13 to … the party making that application had received the arbitral award or, if a request had been made under Section 33, from the date on which that request had been disposed of by the arbitral tribunal: Provided that if … RESPONDENTS:1 DEVASSY C.M., AGED 46 YEARS S/O.LATE MATHEW, CHAMAVALAPPIL HOUSE, POTTA, POTTA P.O.,THRISSUR. 2 THE ARBITRATOR (NATIONAL HIGHWAYS ACT 1956) AND THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR - 680 001. 3 THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR SLAO AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY