Advanced Search Results
Beta Wind Farm (P) Limited Chennai and Others Vs. Tamil Nadu Electrici ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
May-24-2013
Land Acquisition
Wind Energy has been given in the Regulations 2008 as well as in Section 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 33. Let us now refer to those Regulations and provisions of the Act,2003. 34. The relevant Regulation is … was caused to the stake holders/Appellants due to failure to circulate the consultative papers in the present proceedings.” 32. As indicated above, the procedure for determination of tariff and for passing the tariff order in respect of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNeyveli Liginite Corporation Vs. Tamil Nadu State Load Despatch
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission CERC
Oct-01-2007
Land Acquisition
genuineness of the new version could be pointed out.20. According to Section 32 (2) (c) of the Electricity Act, 2003, the SLDCs have to keep accounts of quantity of electricity transmitted through the State grid. The primary responsibility
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmitha Gaulechcha Vs. Chairman of Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Chennai
Mar-05-2013
Land Acquisition
The learned counsel for the respondent Board has also referred to section 32 and 33 of Indian Electricity Act 2003 which also deal with power curtail. 10 On consideration, I find that this writ petition deserves to succeed.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bimal Kumar Jana vs Santa Dey & Ors
Delhi
Mar-12-2026
Land Acquisition
order dated 29th May 2015 it was heldthat the period of 180 days prescribed under Section 86(3) of the DCS Act, 2003 is mandatory and begins from the date of receipt of the expulsion resolution by the RCS. Failure of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarayan Diwakar vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Delhi
Apr-23-2018
Land Acquisition
mismanagement in the society it was appropriate to first initiate action u/s 32 of DCS Act, 1972, for placing the society under suppression…………… Such order … good faith and had taken necessary steps in precaution and contended that in terms of Rule 105 of DCS Act, he was duty bound to revoke the winding up of all proceedings.8. The appellant who is in custody … Page 1 of 20 judgment dated 22.12.2017 was convicted for the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 419/468/471 as well as 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 r/w Section 120 B of the Indian
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArchit Shukla & Ors vs.the Registrar Cooperative Societies, Govt. ...
Delhi
Jul-27-2017
Land Acquisition
respondent No.1/RCS appointed Sh. Dayal Singh, Asstt. Labour Commissioner (Retd.) as an Inspecting Officer under Section 61 of DCS Act 2003 to look into various issues including the validity of 55 members enrolled during the year 2008-09. He submitted
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Khiya Ram Khilwani & Anr vs.registrar of Cooperative Societie ...
Delhi
Jul-27-2017
Land Acquisition
respondent No.1/RCS appointed Sh. Dayal Singh, Asstt. Labour Commissioner (Retd.) as an Inspecting Officer under Section 61 of DCS Act 2003 to look into various issues including the validity of 55 members enrolled during the year 2008-09. He submitted
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMumbai District Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Co-operative Bank Employees ...
Mumbai
Oct-19-2012
Land Acquisition
Steel Board and Anr. 2001 III CLR 560 (SC). (21) Arjun Dada Gadge Vs. Mallappa G. Chougule, AIR 2003 Bombay 441 (HC-Bom.). (22) Management of Sonepat Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Ajit Singh 2005 I LLJ 1122 … conducting the verification of the employees of the principal employer. In para 32, the Division Bench has noted that the decision of the Full Bench … of the Labour Court was passed on an Interim Application under Section 119 (D) of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as "BIR Act") filed by the Respondent-Union seeking an order to restrain Respondent-Bank from
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaees-uz-zama and anr. Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Delhi
May-03-2013
Land Acquisition
February, 2005.3. The prosecution case in nut-shell is that on 30th August, 2003, accused A1 to A3 were apprehended in a raid on Truck No. … purpose this substantial amount was to be utilized. Disclosure statements and Confessional statements of A1 to A5 under Section 32 of POTA and whether they can be relied upon 31. As per the prosecution version, A1 had made … appellants, i.e., the five accused, have been convicted under Sections 3(3), 3(5) and 4 of Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as, POTA) and sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.5,000/- for each offence.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKirloskar Electric Co Ltd Vs. The State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-10-2018
Land Acquisition
passed by the 2nd Respondent under Section 39(1) read with Section 36(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, for the tax periods April 2009 to March 2010 are ex facie illegal and unsustainable & etc., W.P.Nos.26349-26360/2017: … W.P.Nos.58917-58928/2016 and Connected Matters Kirloskar Electric Co. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. The State of Karnataka & Ors. 2/123 32900-32910/2017, W.P.Nos.10544/2017 & 10977- 10987/2017, W.P.Nos.14220-14231/2017, W.P.No.16192/2017, W.P.No.21657/2017, W.P.Nos.28464- 28475/2017, W.P.No.11463/2017, W.P.Nos.16441/2017 & 16895-16905/2017, W.P.Nos.10545/2017 & 10965- 10975/2017, W.P.No.38502/2017,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »