Advanced Search Results

Harbans Kaur . Vs. Iqbal Singh and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

to pay rent to the landlord as per the agreed rent with 10% enhancement yearly. In the year 2003 the tenant was making payment of rent at the rate of Rs.16,564/­ per month. In April, 2003, rent … of the landlord. Landlord filed an Application No.1258 of 2004 under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act, 2001”) praying for eviction on the ground of arrears of rent. … landlord issued notice dated 27.03.2004 stating that with effect from 01.08.2003 upto 29.02.2004, for a period of seven months, the tenant has neither paid or

Bimal Kumar Jana vs Santa Dey & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

order dated 29th May 2015 it was heldthat the period of 180 days prescribed under Section 86(3) of the DCS Act, 2003 is mandatory and begins from the date of receipt of the expulsion resolution by the RCS. Failure of … Section 86(3) of the Act WP(C) 2819/ 2018 Page 6/24of 2003. In aforesaid writ petition vide order dated 29th May 2015 it was heldthat the period of 180 days prescribed under Section 86(3) of the DCS Act,

Venkateshwara Alloys (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Goa and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2(1), 21, 22, 22A, 22B, 23, 24, 24(1), 51A and 53; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 56, 56(1) and 185(2); Electricity Rules - Rules 29 and 31; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2009Bom106

and such position of law continues to exist in the analogus provisions under Section 56 of the Electricity Act, 2003; and as such under both the laws old as well as new there is no provision for permanent … electricity charges as determined to be legally due and further for a declaration that the provisions of Clauses 29(b) and 31(c)(ii) of Notification dated 6-11-1989 published In the Official Gazette dated 18-1-1990 are ultra vires the powers

Meccaa Prime Tannery Vs. Chairman of Tamilnadu Electricity Board

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Regulatory Commission made Tamilnadu Electricity Distribution Code by exercising powers under Section 86 and 46 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 22(1) and 29 of the Electricity Act 2003 enable the State Regulatory Commission to fix the tariff rates.

Shahank Jain vs.the Registrar Cooperative Societies and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

complaints dated 03.10.2016, 25.10.2016, 16.01.2017 and 17.01.2017 as also a petition filed by him under Section 41 of the DCS Act, 2003 (Annexure V), praying inter alia for restraining Shri Vinod Jain from holding the office of a Director on … withheld material information from the Court inasmuch as he has failed to state that as recently as on 29.06.2017, a revision petition filed by him under W.P.(C) 6807/2017 Page 1 of 3 Section 116 of the DCS

Mandeep Mann vs the Registrar of Co-Operative Societies & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Section officer Home Department was appointed asNEGI W.P.(C) 5597/2026 Page 2 of 7Administrator under Section 3 7(1) of DCS Act, 2003 for a period of six months to manage the affairs of the society until a new managing committee … is placed upon the order dated 10th March, 2025 of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) 2992/2025, titled Hari Shankar Singh v. The Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Anr..5. The Court has heard the ld.

Mumbai District Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Co-operative Bank Employees ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Steel Board and Anr. 2001 III CLR 560 (SC). (21) Arjun Dada Gadge Vs. Mallappa G. Chougule, AIR 2003 Bombay 441 (HC-Bom.). (22) Management of Sonepat Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Ajit Singh 2005 I LLJ 1122 … Co-operation approved 1003 posts, though at that time there were less than 29 branches. The Government Panel Auditor i.e. M/s Haribhakti and Co. has in … of the Labour Court was passed on an Interim Application under Section 119 (D) of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as "BIR Act") filed by the Respondent-Union seeking an order to restrain Respondent-Bank from

Nimbadas S/O Devidas Jagtap and ors. Vs. Ramkrushna S/O Sampat Narkhed ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Section 43A read with 29

by the Divisional Commissioner, Nasik in Tenancy Revision Application No. 32/2003 as well as order dated 30th January, 2003 rendered by the Sub Divisional Officer, Jalgaon in Tenancy Appeal No. 2/2003. The Divisional Commissioner confirmed the order … original landlord i.e. Subba Jagtap during his lifetime.3. The petitioners filed an application under section 43A read with section 29 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (for short, "the BT&AL; Act") seeking restoration of the

Panchshila Co-operative House Building Society Ltd. Vs. Govt. of Nct o ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 - Sections 61 and 61(1)

Reported in : 168(2009)DLT205

DIG, Central Prison, New Delhi to inspect the relevant record of Panchshila CHBS Ltd under Section 61(1) of DCS Act 2003 to verify the allegations made by the petitioner as stated hereinabove. Shri Garg is requested to submit report … indicates that the Office of the Registrar of Cooperative Societies received representations from several members vide letters dated 29.06.2009, 03.07.2009, 12.07.2009 and 14.07.2009 complaining about the management of the society. Several allegations have been outlined in the

U.P. State Irrigation Workshop Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

by the learned Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court, in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 600 of 2003 on 29.7.05, and, that he could not have again rejected the application for condonation of delay on the … finding that the Commisioner (Appeals) had no power under the provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 to condone the delay beyond three months in filing of the appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) had rejected