Advanced Search Results

N.R. Mahesh Vs. N. Ashok

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138, 141, 141(1) and 141(2)

Reported in : IV(2007)BC252

legal fiction envisaged in Section 141 of the Act.This judgment has been followed in the judgment reported in 2003 SCC (Cri) 1007 T. Stanes and Co. Ltd v. A. Jaffarullah.14. Therefore, in the instant case, though the … ORDERR. Regupathi, J.1. The petitioner is the sole accused for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After taking sworn statement of the complainant, process has been issued to the

Anupama Homes India Pvt. Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Indian ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 40, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2007(6)ALD145; 2007(6)ALT122

the conduct of the company affairs in accordance with the arrangements made in C.R.P.Nos.5768, 5792 and 6756 of 2003 as reiterated in C.R.P.No.1481 of 2005. 2. The appellant is the plaintiff and the respondents 1 to 4 … correspondence between the parties after filing of the suit and various criminal cases filed for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against P.Jayaprasada Raja have been referred. He would further contend that the third

The Tamil Nadu Housing Board and ors. Vs. Nolambur Residents Welfare

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Housing Board [TNHB] Act - Sections 138, 110(1)(2) ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80(2), 80(1); Registration of Societies Act - Section 20; Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act - Section 25(d); Specific Relief Act - Section 34; Land Acquisition Act - Section 72; Limitation Act - Section 14; Constitution of India - Article 226

is not maintainable, TNHB has filed written statement stating that Plaintiff had not issued the mandatory notice under Section 138 of TNHB Act and non-issuance of notice under Section 138 of TNHB Act is fatal for the institution

Obg Limited and Others (Appellants) Vs. Allan and Others (Respondents)

Court : House of Lords

Subject : Land Acquisition

appeals 1. These three appeals are principally concerned with claims in tort for economic loss caused by intentional acts (a) In OBG Ltd v Allan [2005] QB 762 the defendants were receivers purportedly appointed under a floating … defendant was selling bootleg records made at Elvis Presley concerts without his consent. This was an infringement of section 1 of the Dramatic and Musical Performers' Protection Act 1958, which made bootlegging a criminal offence and, being … 35. In Torquay Hotel Co Ltd v Cousins [1969] 2 Ch 106, 138-139, Lord Denning changed his mind. He said that there was a distinction

S.Balasubramanian Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Chennai, in Crl.R.C.No.34 of 2005 and Crl.A.No.289 of 2003 respectively, set aside the conviction and sentence imposed upon the petitioners and acquit them. For Petitioners : Mr.A.Ramesh … Negotiable Instruments Act, which reads as follows:- ".141. Offences by companies.--(1) If the person committing an offence under Section 138 is a company, every person who, at the time the offence was committed, was incharge of, and was

Bank of Baroda, Through its Panaji Branch Vs. HDFC Bank Ltd. and Other ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

the respondent no.2 was opened in December 2002, while the Demand Draft was sent for collection in February 2003. Thus the account with the respondent no.2 was not opened in close proximity to the encashment of the … thus: That the appellant is a banking corporation established under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act 1970. The appellants are having branch offices at various places including one at Panaji-Goa. The respondent no.1 is … about his address. The Appellate Court has thereafter considered the provisions of Section 131 and 131- A of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the decision

Mr. Vishnu Bhat Vs. Narayan R. Bandekar, Managing Director, Rajaram Ba ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 43, 138, 139 and 147; General Clauses Act - Sections 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 320 and 378

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3770; 2008(1)MhLj497

N.A. Britto, J.1. This is a Complainant's appeal against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by judgment dated 26/08/2005 of the learned JMFC, Vasco-da-Gama. 2. The parties

G. Thimmappa Vs. Shivaraj

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Land Acquisition

1987 SC P.1353. The proviso to clause (b) of Section 142 came to be inserted in the year 2003 keeping in mind the reasons and objects of the Act and to obviate the complainant of the hardship. … accused in Criminal Case No.600/2007 in the case initiated by the respondent herein for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, (for short the Act'), on filing the complaint before the learned JMFC Court.

Janhit Manch and Bhagvanji Raiyani Vs. the State of Maharashtra Throug ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2(19), 2(9A), 9, 22, 31, 31(5), 37, 37(1), 37(IB), 38, 44, 45, 46, 54, 55, 56, 64, 113A, 126, 126(1), 135, 136, 152 and 158; Negotiable Instruments Act; Sea Customs Act - Sections 78A and 178A; Limitation Act; Slum Clearance Act, 1971; Bombay Metropolitan Region Development Authority Act - Sections 13; BMC Act - Sections 144B and 354(AAA); Environmental Protection Act; Water Pollution Act; Air Act; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11, 91 and 141 - Order 2, Rule 2; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 6; Draft Development Rules, 1989; Development Control Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19(1), 21, 31(2), 32, 178A and 226; Development Control Regulations for Greater Bomba

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR110; 2007(1)BomCR329

by the United Nations Development Agency is approx. 4 acres per 1000 population. The demand for water in 2003 was 3500 million litres per day but the Respondent No. 2 could supply only 2950 million litres per … legislative enactment comes in conflict with it. But the courts sit, not to review or revise the legislative action, but to enforce the legislative will and it is only where it finds that the legislature has failed … that the Development Control Regulation 1991 are Rules, within the meaning of Section 158 of the M.R.T.P. Act, 1966 and cannot be brought into operation

Smt. K. Vasantha Kumari Vs. D. Devendra Reddy

Court : Karnataka

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 118, 138 and 142; Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69(1), 69(2) and 69(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : 2008CriLJ1001; 2008(1)AIRKarR398; AIR2008NOC696; 2008CriLJ1001;

A.C. Kabbin, J.1. Challenging the acquittal of the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, in judgment dated 15-9-2003 passed by the learned XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate,