Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the dcs act 2003 section 134 · Page 1 of about 119 results (0.099 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 16 2025

Sri. Prajwal Revanna vs State by Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-16-2025

the Civil Evidence Act, 1995, Section 15(1), Sch. 1, para 9(3)]. For the purposes of the Criminal Justice Act, 2003, Pt. 11 (Sections 98-141) (as amended) (evidence), the definition is the same [see Section 134(1)], save that for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2014

Bihar Chamber of Commerce Vs. Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : May-28-2014

Subject : Education

No. 1 of 2011 and disallowed certain legitimate expenditures without any basis and genuine grounds. 4. Appeal No. 134 of 2012 This Appeal has been preferred by the Appellant under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 … The Appeal No. 131 of 2012 has been preferred by the Appellant under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the Order dated 30.3.2012 passed by the Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter called the State Commission) in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2014

Michael John Milne Vs. the Queen

Court : Australia High Court

Decided on : Feb-14-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

were allotted at a value of four cents each, representing a total value of $2,236,459. 18. In May 2003, Clairmont had acquired, for the sum of $1, a debt of approximately $11,000,000 (later assessed to be closer … expiring on 16 September 2015. That non-parole period was later varied, pursuant to s 19AD(2)(e) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), by Fullerton J as part of a sentence imposed in respect of another offence[5]. The statutory … of Div 400 as they stood between April 2004 and September 2005[8]. Section 400.3(1) provided: "A person is guilty of an offence if: (a) the … The relevant crime attributable to Barat Advisory was that created by s 134.2 of the Code[11], namely obtaining a financial advantage by deception. Section 134.2

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 05 2026

All Omni Bus Owners Association vs the Transport Commissioner

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-05-2026

2001 Bom 21; (ii)Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Dealers Association and others Vs. Government of India and others, AIR 2003 AP 134; (iii)Tamil Nadu Omni Bus Owners, Assn. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, 2004 (1) CTC 161; (iv)M/s.Sharma … project. 5.The construction of the project was taken up in right earnest. COVID-19 pandemic intervened and therefore, the activities came to a grinding halt. Post pandemic, construction re-commenced and major activities were completed. Thereafter, on 27.12.2022, the … vehicles contemplated under the Motor Vehicles Act,1988. These classes are found under Sections 2(21), 2(33) and 2(35). She alsourged that the impugned order, by differentiating

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2016

Shivappa and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, rep. by it Secretary a ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Apr-28-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Neelavva and Others vs- State of Karnataka in W.P. No.64171/2009; m) Narayan Shetty Vs. State of Karnataka [ILR 2003 KAR 3206]; n) May George vs- Special Tahasildar and others [2010 (13) SCC 98]; o) Om Prakash and … the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 under the provisions of Sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (for short hereinafter referred to as the Act ) to acquire the lands for the purpose of Upper … issued by the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 under the provisions of Sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (for short hereinafter referred … [2010(11) SCC 242]; d) D.V. Chandrashekharappa vs- The State of Karnataka [W.P.No. 13410 / 2010 c/w. WP Nos.16461-463/2010 D.D: 19.11.2011]; e) Sri. Yankappa vs- The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 2016

K. Ramapandi Trading as Vasanthi and Co. and Tamil Nadu Oil Industries ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-10-2016

Subject : Intellectual Property

provisions of Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Act. The defendant would further state that it's turnover for the year 2003 and 2004 was Rs.1.27 Crores and for the years 2004 and 2005 was Rs.2.4 crores and the registration … shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous applications are closed. Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Section 134, Section 135 -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2025

Madras Fertilizers Limited., vs S.Saraswathi Velayutham

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-02-2025

Rules r/w.Order VII Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code read with Sections 27, 134 & 135of Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Sections 58 & 62 of the Copyright Act, 1957, to pass a judgment and decree for: … copyright.3.9 The Director of the plaintiff company stated that NPK production has been drastically fallen from the year 2003 to 2009. Unable to digest the steady growth of the defendant and in order to camouflage the business … Side Rules r/w.Order VII Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code read with Sections 27, 134 & 135of Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Sections 58 &

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 2005

Pukhraj JaIn Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Sep-30-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)104ITD371(Hyd.)

arriving at the market value, he relied on the following decisions: GTO v. Vinod Kumar Hissaria, 131 Taxmann 134 (Jodh.) (Mag.) GTO v. Smt. Achia Tikku, 89 Taxmann 82 (Indore) (Mag.) For the proposition that the AO … and circumstances of the case in confirming assessment of Rs. 22,70,450/- as deemed gift Section 4(1)(a) of the Act adopting the stamp duty values of 5 plots sold by the appellant during the year. 2. The learned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 2004

RaziuddIn Mohd. Siddiqui and anr. Vs. Zaihab Khatoon and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-26-2004

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96(2) - Order 9, Rule 13

Reported in : 2004(6)ALD564; 2004(6)ALT658; 2005(1)CTC179; [2005(2)JCR31(AP)]

Controller, KSRTC v. V. Mahadeva Shetty, : AIR2003SC4172 , Kasar Devi v. Union of India and Ors., : 2003CriLJ3750 and Aswani Kumar Singh v. U.P. Public Service Commission and Ors., AIR 2003 2661.28. In P. Kiran Kumar's … Ouseph, AIR 1954 Ker. L.T.322; Gaurishanker v. Jagar Narain, AIR 1934 All. 134; State of U.P. v. Mohamnmad Noor, 1959 SCR 595. Also see In … Division Bench was on two counts, namely, (1) as to the applicability of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to an application filed seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal against ex parte decree, when such

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2025

Assistant Commissioner of vs M/S.Sterlite Industries

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-25-2025

17 2018 (4) TMI 1532 18 286 ITR 675 (Mad) 19 322 ITR 369 (Cal.HC) 20 370 ITR 134 (Bom.HC) 21 393 ITR 366 (Guj.HC) 22 110 ITR 165 (Mad.HC) 23 322 ITR 631 (Del.HC) 24 W.A.No.1171of … the respondent in Writ Appeals (assessee/writ petitioner) was to notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, Act) for assessment years (in short, AY) 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 (in short, captioned Assessment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial