Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the dcs act 2003 section 132 · Page 1 of about 194 results (0.092 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 24 2011

Anas Abdul Rashid MachiswalA. Vs. State of Gujarat.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-24-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act - Section 3[1][3], 4, 20, 21[2][b], 22[3], 51, 23, 32; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 307; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act - Sections 3, 4; Bombay Police Act - Sections 135[1], 130; Explosive Substance Act - Sections 4, 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 219, 164, 311; Evidence Act - Section 30; Constitution of India - Article 21; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act - Section 15

involve common question of law and arise from the common judgment rendered in POTA Case No. 7 of 2003 and 9 of 2003, they are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.2. It is pertinent … who are convicted by the Special [POTA] Court and sentenced under Section 3[1] of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 ["POTA" for short] to undergo RI for a period of ten years and fine of Rs. 5000/-

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2005

Manmohansingh Vig Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-07-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)6SOT18(Mum.)

declaration which was retracted later.5. The appellant submits that the assessment under Chapter XIV-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the case of M/s. MJS Associates is still pending. If this assessment of the appellant, the … The assessing officer pointed out in the assessment order that when statement of the assessee was recorded under section 132(4) on 11-10- 1996 he had admitted undisclosed income of Rs. 20,00,000, which was subsequently revised to As. 30,70,450

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2009

Doctors X-ray and Pathology Institute P. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Director of ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-26-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)227CTR(All)546; [2009]318ITR125(All); [2010]186TAXMAN186(All)

or direction in the nature of certiorari and to quash the consequential block assessment notices dated April 29, 2003, and May 21, 2003 (annexure 5).2. The brief facts as enumerated in the writ petition are as follows:Petitioner … declare that the search conducted against the petitioners on September 14, 2002, as illegal and in contravention of Section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari and to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 23 2025

K.S.Gita Vs The Chief General Manager

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-23-2025

exercise of the power conferred on it under Section 8(1)(d) and Section 8(1)(h) of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003, had directed the Chief Vigilance Officer of the respondent Bank to conduct an investigation and submit an investigation

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2005

MicrofIn Securities (P) Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Decided on : Mar-30-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)94TTJLuck767

relating to the very validity of the assessment on the ground of jurisdiction of the Addl. CIT to act as 'AO' and pass the assessment order dt. 10th Feb., 2003, and the other relating to the merits … an AO and had validly passed the assessment order dt. 10th Feb., 2003, even after a petition under Section 144A (as moved by the appellant) had been entertained by him; and in upholding the validity of the … the purposes of issuing warrant of authorization to conduct search under Section 132(1) or to make requisition under Section 132A of the Act. Such an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2013

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rakesh Sarin

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-24-2013

Subject : Direct Taxation

two years from the end of the month in which the last of the authorisation for search under Section 132 of the Act was conducted as prescribed under the statute.7. Learned Single Judge held that although the assessee … the order of assessment dated 30.06.2005 for the block Assessment Years from 1997-98 to 2002-03 and part of 2003-04 and for a consequential direction to the respondents to drop the proceedings initiated against the petitioner in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2007

First Global Stockbroking (P) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-14-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)115TTJ(Mum.)173

the assessee and on analysis of the seized material learned AO framed the assessment order on 13th June, 2003 and determined the undisclosed income of the assessee for the block period as under: 18 Subject to the … Buffalo Networks (P) Ltd. having shareholding of 26 per cent (approx.) in the company.Search and seizure action under Section 132--A search operation under Section 132(1) of the IT Act was conducted at various offices and residential premises of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2011

The Commissioner of Income-tax and Another Vs. Smt. Mukta Sridhar

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-19-2011

Subject : Direct Taxation

to the assessment. From the records, it is noticed that a search of the premises was conducted under Section-132 of the Act which commenced on 6.1.2004 and went up to 27.2.2004 when statement under Section-132 of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2013

Dr.P.G.Viswanathan Vs. Director of Income Tax

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-04-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:4. 1-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition Nos.20073 and 20074 of 2003 and W.P.M.P.Nos.25070 and 25071 of 2003 and W.P.M.P.No.3362 and 3363 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.No.24563 and 24564 of 2005 … Road, R.S.Puram, Coimbatore and in the premises of Vikram Hospital at No.69, West Venkatasamy Road, R.S.Puram, Coimbatore, under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. During the search proceedings, the respondent department had seized a number of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2008

Hind Metals and Industries Pvt. Vs. Nava Bharat Ferro Alloys Pvt.

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Jan-09-2008

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL77

the dispute in the name of facilitation and promotion as is warranted under Section 30 of the Electricity Act 2003. 5) The Commission's finding that the respondent No. 1 could use the feeder exclusively is opposed to the … the year 1995.The Orissa State Electricity Board proposed vide letter dated 15.07.1995 to release 29 MW/34 MVA at 132 KV to the respondent No. 1 subject to the condition that (1) the power would be made available

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial