Advanced Search Results
Anas Abdul Rashid MachiswalA. Vs. State of Gujarat.
Gujarat
Jan-24-2011
Criminal
Prevention of Terrorism Act - Section 3[1][3], 4, 20, 21[2][b], 22[3], 51, 23, 32; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 307; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act - Sections 3, 4; Bombay Police Act - Sections 135[1], 130; Explosive Substance Act - Sections 4, 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 219, 164, 311; Evidence Act - Section 30; Constitution of India - Article 21; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act - Section 15
involve common question of law and arise from the common judgment rendered in POTA Case No. 7 of 2003 and 9 of 2003, they are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.2. It is pertinent … who are convicted by the Special [POTA] Court and sentenced under Section 3[1] of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 ["POTA" for short] to undergo RI for a period of ten years and fine of Rs. 5000/-
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManmohansingh Vig Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Nov-07-2005
Land Acquisition
(2006)6SOT18(Mum.)
declaration which was retracted later.5. The appellant submits that the assessment under Chapter XIV-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the case of M/s. MJS Associates is still pending. If this assessment of the appellant, the … The assessing officer pointed out in the assessment order that when statement of the assessee was recorded under section 132(4) on 11-10- 1996 he had admitted undisclosed income of Rs. 20,00,000, which was subsequently revised to As. 30,70,450
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDoctors X-ray and Pathology Institute P. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Director of ...
Allahabad
Aug-26-2009
Direct Taxation
(2009)227CTR(All)546; [2009]318ITR125(All); [2010]186TAXMAN186(All)
or direction in the nature of certiorari and to quash the consequential block assessment notices dated April 29, 2003, and May 21, 2003 (annexure 5).2. The brief facts as enumerated in the writ petition are as follows:Petitioner … declare that the search conducted against the petitioners on September 14, 2002, as illegal and in contravention of Section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari and to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
K.S.Gita Vs The Chief General Manager
Chennai
Sep-23-2025
exercise of the power conferred on it under Section 8(1)(d) and Section 8(1)(h) of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003, had directed the Chief Vigilance Officer of the respondent Bank to conduct an investigation and submit an investigation
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMicrofIn Securities (P) Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow
Mar-30-2005
Direct Taxation
(2005)94TTJLuck767
relating to the very validity of the assessment on the ground of jurisdiction of the Addl. CIT to act as 'AO' and pass the assessment order dt. 10th Feb., 2003, and the other relating to the merits … an AO and had validly passed the assessment order dt. 10th Feb., 2003, even after a petition under Section 144A (as moved by the appellant) had been entertained by him; and in upholding the validity of the … the purposes of issuing warrant of authorization to conduct search under Section 132(1) or to make requisition under Section 132A of the Act. Such an
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rakesh Sarin
Chennai
Sep-24-2013
Direct Taxation
two years from the end of the month in which the last of the authorisation for search under Section 132 of the Act was conducted as prescribed under the statute.7. Learned Single Judge held that although the assessee … the order of assessment dated 30.06.2005 for the block Assessment Years from 1997-98 to 2002-03 and part of 2003-04 and for a consequential direction to the respondents to drop the proceedings initiated against the petitioner in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFirst Global Stockbroking (P) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Nov-14-2007
Direct Taxation
(2008)115TTJ(Mum.)173
the assessee and on analysis of the seized material learned AO framed the assessment order on 13th June, 2003 and determined the undisclosed income of the assessee for the block period as under: 18 Subject to the … Buffalo Networks (P) Ltd. having shareholding of 26 per cent (approx.) in the company.Search and seizure action under Section 132--A search operation under Section 132(1) of the IT Act was conducted at various offices and residential premises of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income-tax and Another Vs. Smt. Mukta Sridhar
Karnataka
Oct-19-2011
Direct Taxation
to the assessment. From the records, it is noticed that a search of the premises was conducted under Section-132 of the Act which commenced on 6.1.2004 and went up to 27.2.2004 when statement under Section-132 of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr.P.G.Viswanathan Vs. Director of Income Tax
Chennai
Jan-04-2013
Land Acquisition
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:4. 1-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition Nos.20073 and 20074 of 2003 and W.P.M.P.Nos.25070 and 25071 of 2003 and W.P.M.P.No.3362 and 3363 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.No.24563 and 24564 of 2005 … Road, R.S.Puram, Coimbatore and in the premises of Vikram Hospital at No.69, West Venkatasamy Road, R.S.Puram, Coimbatore, under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. During the search proceedings, the respondent department had seized a number of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHind Metals and Industries Pvt. Vs. Nava Bharat Ferro Alloys Pvt.
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Jan-09-2008
Land Acquisition
(2008)LCAPTEL77
the dispute in the name of facilitation and promotion as is warranted under Section 30 of the Electricity Act 2003. 5) The Commission's finding that the respondent No. 1 could use the feeder exclusively is opposed to the … the year 1995.The Orissa State Electricity Board proposed vide letter dated 15.07.1995 to release 29 MW/34 MVA at 132 KV to the respondent No. 1 subject to the condition that (1) the power would be made available
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »