Advanced Search Results

AANIL Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

of BNS 2023( 328 and 273 of IPC) and 7(1) and 20(2) of Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 in Crime No.1258 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The case of … and remanded to judicial custody on 18.12.2025 for the offence under Sections 123 and 275 of BNS 2023( 328 and 273 of IPC) and 7(1) … Palladam Police Station, Tiruppur District. (Crime No.1258 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioner/accused in Crime No.1258 of 2025

Commissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai Vs. P. Sinnasamy and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

a place and everything is in its place." (xi) In Balram Kumawat v. Union of India reported in 2003 (7) SCC 628, the Supreme Court held that, Contextual reading is a well-known proposition of interpretation of statute. … that there is no bar against such option, by reason of the goods, being an item notified under Section 123 of the Act, or for any other reasons, vide Final Order No.455 of 2007, dated 20.04.2007, CESTAT, Chennai,

R.P. Hrishikeshan Nair and Others Vs. Union of India Represented by th ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Subject : Land Acquisition

emoluments of the transferred G.D.S. However, the respondents have denied the protection of TRCA and to legitimize their action, they have taken an undertaking from the applicant to the effect that in the event of transfer to … (1996) 8 SCC 489, as under: "7. The appointment of the respondent is governed by the Rules in Section III of the compilation of Swamy’s Service Rules for Extra-Departmental Staff in Postal Department. The Rules provide the … practices in some elections. Apart from contending as to violation of Section 123(1) and 123(6) of the Representation of People's Act, there was alleged contravention

Kirloskar Electric Co Ltd Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

passed by the 2nd Respondent under Section 39(1) read with Section 36(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, for the tax periods April 2009 to March 2010 are ex facie illegal and unsustainable & etc., W.P.Nos.26349-26360/2017: … 10-01-2018 W.P.Nos.58917-58928/2016 and Connected Matters Kirloskar Electric Co. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. The State of Karnataka & Ors. 123/123 the matters are restored to file of the respective Assessing Authorities, for passing fresh orders in accordance with

Govind Singh. Vs. Harchand Kaur.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Representation of People

Acts : Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 15, 100(1)(b), 116A, 123(1)(A), 123 (1) A (b) and B (b),

Ram Singh and cross-examination of PW-10, Jaspal Singh who was a Sarpanch of village Ibrahimpur from 1992 to 2003 and had failed in the Assembly Election of 2002 which was held on 13.2.2002, as also in his … the polling, she challenged the election of the appellant alleging corrupt practice against him within the meaning of Section 123 (1) (A) of the Act of 1951.3. The essential details of the Election petition which formed the basis

Shri Subramanya Sharma and ors. Vs. the Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (2006)(106)ECC215

of customs evasion. Revenue proceeded against the concerned persons by issue of show cause notice dated 21st March 2003. The adjudicating authority after following the principles of natural justice passed the impugned order. In the said order, … appellant under Section 12(a) of the customs Act 1962. (ii) Since the seized goods were not notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, the burden to prove that they are smuggled is on the Revenue. (iii) The

V. Muniyandi Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (2004)(167)ELT215Tri(Chennai)

invited my attention to the order of the Tribunal in the case of Sadbhavana v.CC, Indore reported in 2003 (158) E.L.T. 652 wherein it is held that in case of failure to produce document regarding legal import/possession … documents.6. Shri A. Ganesh appearing for the appellants submitted that the goods involved are not notified goods under Section 123 of the Act and the goods are covered under Open General Licence. Therefore, the burden to prove that

MicrofIn Securities (P) Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)94TTJLuck767

relating to the very validity of the assessment on the ground of jurisdiction of the Addl. CIT to act as 'AO' and pass the assessment order dt. 10th Feb., 2003, and the other relating to the merits … an AO and had validly passed the assessment order dt. 10th Feb., 2003, even after a petition under Section 144A (as moved by the appellant) had been entertained by him; and in upholding the validity of the … Nalini Mahajan v. Director of IT (Inv) and Ors. (2002) 257 ITR 123 (Del), wherein it has been held that search and seizure action as

A.K. Hamsa Mohideen Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2004)(97)ECC424

views in identical cases. One such order is in the case of Sadbavana v. CC, Indore reported in 2003 (158) E.L.T. 652. In view of the above, I hold that there is no material to sustain the … case are electronic goods and are easily available in the market and that these goods are non-notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962 and therefore, the burden to prove that they are smuggled goods is with

M.Saraswathy Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

telomerase to overcome the limit of somatic cell divisions to stop or slow cell senescence (Flanary, 2002; Hayflick, 2003). Others are searching for substances that mimic the effects of caloric restriction, which has been shown to extend … the injured himself filed the Application, under Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 read with Section 123 (c) (2) and Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989, for compensation in respect of the injuries sustained