Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the dcs act 2003 section 122 · Page 1 of about 142 results (0.079 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 08 2024

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-08-2024

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … SCC 71; Tata Cellular v. Union of India [1994] Supp. 2 SCR 122 : (1994) 6 SCC 651; Mahabir Auto Stores v. Indian Oil Corporation … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2007

Ms Mayawati Vs. Dy Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-30-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)113TTJ(Delhi)178

Chapter VII of the Transfer of Property Act 1882 which deals with gifts of movable and immovable properties. Section 122 defines 'gift' as under: 122. "Gift" is the transfer of certain existing movable or immovable property made voluntarily … 1. These cross appeals, arising out of the order of the learned CIT(Appeals) dated 15.11.2006 for A.Y. 2003-04 are being decided by a common order for the sake of convenience.2. Dr. Rakesh Gupta Advocate, along with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2022

Rashidul Jafar @ Chota Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-06-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

4 15-02- 1238/2003 04-01- 25 Year 32 Year 52 Year ------ 1- Form- A Pending S/O RAJVEER C.R.No-162, 2003 Decided 2005 10 Mth. 02 Mth. 4 Mth. at D.M Level. SINGH1741997, 13 day 22 day 2- Proposal … A / Nominal Number (Murder n No.With Criminal Hon’ble Roll / Jail Policy / Cases 1, Filing Appeal Actual With Supreme Mercy Petition 2, 3 or Date With Remiss Court more Judgment ion Murders / Date Kidnapin … life and are incarcerated in prison, whose crime is covered by the sections mentioned in prohibited category in sub-rule-(vi), (viii) and (ix) of para- 3 … 693,745/2004, U/S- 1 302/34I.P.C,25A Act 15 SATISH S.T.No-443/ 2002, Murder 1 22-02- 1222/2005 18 Year 23 Year 37 Year Released on Form- A Pending at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 17 2010

United States Vs. Comstock

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-17-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

gives to the other a right to protection.” Id. , §315, at 122. Once the Federal Government’s criminal jurisdiction over a prisoner ends, so does … delivery of mental health care to federal prisoners, and has long provided for their civil commitment. See, e.g., Act of Mar. 3, 1855, 10 Stat. 682; Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984, 18 U. S. C. §§4241-4247. … , 21, and, in particular, the reasonableness of the relation between the new statute and pre-existing federal interests. Section 4248 differs from earlier statutes in that it focuses directly upon persons who, due to a mental illness,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 2016

Neeraj Kumar Vs. Pooja Verma

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-19-2016

Subject : Family

1998 Andhra Pradesh 296 Smt.S.Vijayalaxmi vs. S.Bheemreddy, AIR 1999 Rajasthan 181 Smt.Shimla Devi vs. Kuldeep Sharma, and AIR 2003 Allahabad 51 Poonam Gupta vs. Ghanshyam Gupta, in support of his contentions. 14. It has been submitted by … Orissa LR 600 Durga Prasanna Tripathy vs. Arundhati Tripathy, AIR 2007 Gauhati 122 (DB) Smt.Rita Das Biswas vs. Trilokesh Das Biswas, AIR 2007 (NOC) 168 … son was born on January 01, 2006. 3. In the petition filed under Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 the instances of cruelty stated to have been committed by the respondent/wife cited by the appellant/husband are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2022

M/s Jindal Steel And Power Ltd. Vs. Chattisgarh State Elect. Reg. Comm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-29-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

2003 Act. The 2003 Act, came into force on 10.06.2003 insofar as Sections 1 to 120 and Sections 122 to 185 are concerned. The Preamble of the 2003 Act states that it has been enacted to consolidate … Ors. Etc. ... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT NAGARATHNA , J.1. These Civil Appeals filed under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 arise out of common impugned Judgment dated 07.05.2008 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, New 1 Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2003

The State of Maharashtra Through Special Land Acquisition Officer and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-08-2003

Subject : PropertyMRTP

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 40(1), 40(3), 113 and 127; Land Acquisition Act, 1984 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 9(3), 11A, 23, 23(1), 24, 25, 28, 50(2), 126 and 126(4); Maharashtra Land Revenue Code - Sections 44

Reported in : 2004(1)ALLMR253

Matched in: Advocate K.B. Choudhari, A.G.P. and ;A.S.Bajaj, Adv. in First Appeal No.: 347, 348, 349, 350, 351 and 352 of 1993 S.K. Shelke, Adv. and ;A.S.Bajaj, Adv. in First Appeal No.: 450 of 1994, 762 of 1997, 364 for 1998 and 96 of 2003 for Respondent No.2

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2016

Roche Products (India) Pvt Ltd. and Others Vs. Drugs Controller Genera ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-25-2016

Subject : Education

March 11, 2010) at paragraphs 9 and 10 and Mohun Bagan Athletic Club v. Deba Prasad Mukherjee (AIR 2003 Cal 298 at paragraphs 30 to 33). Case of Rajveer Food (supra) does not apply to the present … pending applications. 2. The plaintiff No. 1, Roche Products (India) Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, as amended (the "Companies Act"), is an affiliate of plaintiff No. 2, and is the importer and … 2 to 4 by filing two appeals under Order 43 read with Section 151 CPC and Section 10 of Delhi High Court Act, 1966, being … granted by the defendant No. 1 on October 11, 2002 under Rule 122A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, as amended ( for short

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2016

Genentech Inc and Others Vs. Drugs Controller General of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-25-2016

Subject : Education

for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer in accordance with the applicable law in India, i.e. the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, as amended (the "Drugs Act"), the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, as amended (the "Drugs Rules"), the … under. 11. Reply has been filed on behalf of the defendant No. 3 to the plaintiffs' application under Section 94 red with Order 39, Rule 1 and 2 CPC. In the pleadings of defendant No. 3, it … was granted by defendant No. 1 on October 11, 2002 under Rule 122A of the Drugs Rules. The plaintiffs' Trastuzumab is presently imported into India

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 2010

Preeti Daga and Others Vs. Cc, New Delhi

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-15-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

he used to attend work of Sri Anil Goyel for customs clearance of consignments from 1999 till July 2003. But he could not say when and why name of M/s Maya Trading was changed to M/s Aman … table below. Both sets of appeals are dealt by this common order in view of similar cause of action and common investigation resulting in similar consequences. Both sides could not inform whether other persons/concerns against whom adjudication … and Shri Ram Kishan Tiwari, the Proprietor of M/s.Maya Trading Co., under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 read with proviso to the Section … 123/2006 Penalty of Rs. 50,000 u/s 112(a) 2. Shri Dillip F. Meheta 122/2006 Penalty of Rs.3.00 lakhs u/s 112(a) 124/2006 Penalty of Rs. 3.00 lakhs

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial