Advanced Search Results

Sh. Sanjay Chiripal Vs. Registrar Co-operative Societies and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Co-operative Societies

Acts : Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 - Sections 116, 62, 67, 61(1); Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, 2007 - Rule 22

this a merely a technical irregularity which is fully cured by the provisions contained in Section 39 of the DCS Act, 2003. Moreover, there is no such instance in case of the present Managing Committee and as such no cause

H.K. Madhia Vs. Financial Commissioner and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

manner. One of the main contention of the petitioner is that RCS had no power u/s 41 of the DCS Act, 2003 and Rule 19 and 25 of the DCS Rules, 2007 to cease his membership. Further, that RCS has … This was, complains the petitioner, totally overlooked by the lower authorities. The proceedings conducted by the Registrar under Section 41 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 read with Rule 19 and 25 of Delhi Cooperative Societies … of Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, 2007 and the Rules as amended on 12.01.2007 are further challenged on the ground that his case is governed by

Mr. Roshan Rai vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

the learned Single Judge it is appropriate to advert to - 40 -Sections 70 and 73 of the Act, 2003. Section 70 provides for constitution of Central Electricity Authority which is respondent No.42 herein. Section 73 which defines functions … Kannappa (died) and others Vs. The Commissioner, Tiruvottriyur Municipality, Madras and others3 (S. Kannappa) to contend that under Section 12 (2) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, consent of theW.P. No.17052/2013 c/w W.P. No.31847-31892/2013 D.D. 14.08.2017 W.P. No.25137/2023

M/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Appellant’s Captive Power Plant (CPP) to consumers other than the captive use is not permissible under Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and accordingly the Appellant should either take distribution license from the Commission under section 12 or seek exemption

M/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

Appellants Captive Power Plant (CPP) to consumers other than the captive use is not permissible under Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and accordingly the Appellant should either take distribution license from the Commission under section 12 or seek exemption

Gnanamoorthy G vs the Chairman Tangedco

Court : Chennai

without the permission of the petitioner's father, which is a violation of Section 12(2) of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003. According to the petitioner, the transformer running across his land is causing hindrance to the construction activity and

Bihar Industries Association Sinha Library Road Vs. Bihar Electricity ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

Surendra Kumar, Judicial Member. 1. This is an Appeal under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 filed by the appellant Bihar Industries Association against the order dated 15.03.2013 passed by the Bihar Electricity Regulatory … the State Commission for the year 2008-09 before this Tribunal by way of an Appeal, being Appeal No. 128 of 2008. This Tribunal while dismissing the appeal gave important directions to the State Commission vide Judgment dated

Sri. Prajwal Revanna vs State by Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

the Civil Evidence Act, 1995, Section 15(1), Sch. 1, para 9(3)]. For the purposes of the Criminal Justice Act, 2003, Pt. 11 (Sections 98-141) (as amended) (evidence), the definition is the same [see Section 134(1)], save that for … a computer system or computer network, and may be in any form (including computer printouts magnetic or - 12 -optical storage media, punched cards, punched tapes) or stored internally in the memory of the computer;”On conjoint reading

Brushabha Pradhan Vs. State and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Works of Licensees Rules, 2006 (for short, “the 2006 Rules,”.) framed under Section 67 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Grievance of the petitioner is that he owns land comprising of several plots including plot No.712, which has … : Mr B. Mohanrty, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr N.C.Panigrahi, Sr.Advocate for opp. parties 2 & 3. 02. 12.12.2013 This petition seeks quashing of the order dated 25.5.2013 (Annexure-4) passed by the Collector-opp. party no.4 under Rule

Venkadasan K., Secretary N.L.C.i.T.i. Apprentice Welfare Association V ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCivil

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 12(3); Apprentices Act, 1961

Reported in : (2005)2MLJ694

aggrieved against the order of the learned single Judge dated December 17, 2004 made in W.P.No. 35562 of 2003, in and by which, the learned single Judge declined to interfere with the settlement dated May 18, 1995 … Judge declined to interfere with the settlement dated May 18, 1995 reached under Section 12(3) of Industrial Disputes Act between Management and Workmen of Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited (in short, 'N.L.C. Ltd.').2. The terms of the said