Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai Vs. P. Sinnasamy and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

a place and everything is in its place." (xi) In Balram Kumawat v. Union of India reported in 2003 (7) SCC 628, the Supreme Court held that, Contextual reading is a well-known proposition of interpretation of statute. … MAX stapler pin packets, and the suitcase used for concealing abovesaid gold bits, should not be confiscated under Section 119 of the Customs Act, 1962. (iii) Why the other assorted goods totally valued at Rs.41,117/- (CIF) seized along

MicrofIn Securities (P) Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)94TTJLuck767

of jurisdiction of the Addl. CIT to act as 'AO' and pass the assessment order dt. 10th Feb., 2003, and the other relating to the merits of additions/variations as stand comprised in the said assessment order. As … and directions to other IT authorities as it may deem fit for proper administration of this Act under Section 119 of the IT Act. In the matter of assigning the jurisdiction of "AO", it possesses the exclusive authority

Shri Baburam Premchand Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Land Acquisition

Appellants submitted the following case law in support of their claim: CC Kandla v. Sahil Trends and Ors.- 2003 (53) RLT 729 (CESTAT-Del). In this case it was held that goods cleared by Customs and not available … 8,59,776/- used to conceal 100 tons of Tin Sheets/Coils mentioned at 4 above were liable for confiscation under Section 119 of the Customs Act, 1962. (11) To confiscate 48.851 MTs of tin sheets covered by Bill of Entry

M/S.Tranquilo Hospitality LLP Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Police,

Court : Chennai

Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003. He further submitted that similar kinds of issues have already been dealt with by this Court in W.P.Crl.No.560 … Police, T-16, Police Station, No.35, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Semmenchery, Chennai-600 119. ..RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to direct the respondents to not to harass the petitioner by

O'Brien (Respondent) Vs. Chief Constable of South Wales Police (Appell ...

Court : House of Lords

Subject : Right to Information

alleged against DI Lewis. Mr O'Brien gave notice of his intention to adduce evidence designed to demonstrate that DCS Carsley had behaved with similar impropriety on one other occasion and that DI Lewis had done so on … Lordships' House. They are now to be found codified in sections 101 to 106 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 ('the 2003 Act'), which were brought into effect in December last year. 13. Not infrequently a defendant in … of your Lordships' House. They are now to be found codified in sections 101 to 106 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 ('the 2003 Act'), … in Mood Music Publishing Co Ltd v De Wolfe Ltd [1976] Ch 119. This was a breach of copyright case involving music and the issue

Palani.S Vs The Additional / Joint / Deputy / Assistant Commissioner

Court : Chennai

of account, other requisitioned under Section 132A documents or any assets st after the 31 day of May, 2003 requisitioned under Section 132A but on or before the 31st day of on or after the 1st day … April, 2021.27. In this case, a statutory presumption has to be drawn in terms of theillustration (e) to Section 119 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (formerly under Section 114(e) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872) that the

Mumbai District Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Co-operative Bank Employees ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Steel Board and Anr. 2001 III CLR 560 (SC). (21) Arjun Dada Gadge Vs. Mallappa G. Chougule, AIR 2003 Bombay 441 (HC-Bom.). (22) Management of Sonepat Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Ajit Singh 2005 I LLJ 1122 … application. (3) Costs-in-cause." 2. The impugned order of the Labour Court was passed on an Interim Application under Section 119 (D) of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as "BIR Act") filed by the Respondent-Union seeking

M/S.Lucas Tvs Ltd vs the Assistant Commissioner

Court : Chennai

Circle-II(4), Chennai 600 034. .. Respondent/Appellant Tax Case Appeal has been filed under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Chennai dated 15.02.2008 in ITA No.119/Mds/2007. … appellant is engaged in the business of manufacture and export of auto electrical components. For the Assessment Year 2003-2004, the appellant filed its return of income admitting a total income of Rs.32,95,32,630/-. The return was processed under

Bhanuben Panchal and Chandrikaben Panchal Vs. Chief Cit

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2004]136TAXMAN237(Guj)

226 of the Constitution is the order dated 14-10-2003 (Annexure 'O') passed by the Chief Commissioner, Surat under section 119(2)(a) read with sections 234A, 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the

Ashok Kumar Sethi Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench A , Chennai in I.T.SSA.No.95/MDS/2003 for the … (SC), it has been held as follows:- The Circular dated 23.5.1996 was issued by the Board under section 119(2)(a) which vests power in the Board to pass general or special order for waiver of interest under the