Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the dcs act 2003 section 117 · Page 1 of about 116 results (0.088 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 05 2005

Mahathma Gandhi Vidya Peetha Trust and anr. Vs. All India Council for ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-05-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : All India Counsel for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 10 and 117

Reported in : AIR2006Kant17; ILR2005KAR6073; 2005(6)KarLJ346

thus:'The conferment of the power to grant a licence for the holding of a hat or fair under Section 117 of the Act includes the power to make incidental or consequential orders for specification of a day on … herein dated 4-8-2005 (Annexure-A) imposing penalty for the excess admission made by the college for the academic year 2003-2004 and for quashing of the communication dated 15-8-2005 (Annextire-Q), whereby the intake of the petitioner for the academic

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2005

In Re: Rohit Soaps and Detergents Private Limited;

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-31-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 251, 391 to 394, 394A, 394(2), 394(3), 397 and 398; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 76

Reported in : [2005]61SCL161(All)

Amalgamation be sanctioned by this Court so as to be binding with effect from 1st day of April, 2003 or from such other date as this Court may fix, on all the Members and Creditors (if any) … S.P. Mahrotra, J.1. The present Company Petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been filed by Rohit Soaps & Detergents Private Limited, having its Registered Office at 117/H-2/202, Pandu … S.P. Mahrotra, J.1. The present Company Petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been filed by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2005

M.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Pandey Construction Co.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-13-2005

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2); Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 - Sections 3, 7, 7A, 7B, 7B(2A), 9, 10, 16, 17, 17A, 18, 19, 19(1), 20, 22, 23, 24(1), 24(2), 42, 65, 84C and 211; Rent Control Act; Representation of People Act - Sections 81, 82, 86, 86(1) and 117; Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 28 and 28(4); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 19; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act - Sections 13(1), 13(5) and 13(6); Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 18; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(35); Rajasthan Premises Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1950 - Sections 13(4); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 34(1) and 34(3); Ciminal Procedure Code - Sections 340, 342, 344, 345, 34

Reported in : 2005(2)MPHT206; 2005(2)MPLJ550

Matched in: Advocate M.L. Jaiswal, Sr. Adv. and ;R.S. Jaiswal, Adv. in C.R. No. 633/2003, ;V.R. Rao, Adv. in C.R. No. 1000/2003, ;Sanjay K. Yadav, Govt. Adv. in C.R. Nos. 1330/2003 and 151/2004 and ;Mohd. Nasir, Adv. in C K.C. Ghildiyal, Adv. in C.R. No. 633/2003, ;Sanjay K. Yadav, Govt. Adv. in C.R. No. 1000/2003, ;V.R. Rao, Adv. in C.R. Nos. 1119 and 1330/2003 and ;V.R. Rao, Adv. in C.R. No. 151/2004

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 28 2012

United States Vs. Alvarez

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-28-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

against the idea that we need Oceania’s Ministry of Truth. See G. Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) (Centennial ed. 2003). Were this law to be sustained, there could be an endless list of subjects the National Government or … Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc., 543 U. S. 111, 117 (2004) ; see also San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United … of appeals for the ninth circuit No. 11-210. Argued February 22, 2012-Decided June 28, 2012 The Stolen Valor Act makes it a crime to falsely claim receipt of military decorations or medals and provides an enhanced penalty … . makes any mate-rially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or repre-sentation.” §1001. Section 1001’s prohibition on false statements made to Government officials, in communications concerning

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2026

Ntpc Employees Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. vs Registrar Coo ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-08-2026

Subject : Right to Information

Mahesh Kumar Gupta, Retd. DANICS, as an Administrator-cum- Returning Officer under Section 35(5) of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 (hereinafter, ‘DCS Act’) to manage the day- to-day affairs of the Society and to also conduct the elections … itself NEGI W.P.(C) 18454/2025 Page 3 of 13contains the reasons for exercising the powers under Section 35(5) of the DCS Act for appointment of administrator. Respondent no.l is using the pleadings in the petition to substantiate his order.4. It … of the DCS Act has also been filed being ARB Case No. 117/GH/DR/ARB/2025-26/559-70 challenging the newly elected Managing Committee as also the elections conducted by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2007

Modi Rubber Ltd. Vs. Guardian International Corp.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-28-2007

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 16 and 18; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 82; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 6, 6.1, 9, 11, 17, 18, 19 to 24, 25 and 36; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 32, 39 and 56; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 14, 14(1), 16, 21, 23, 41, 41(1) and 42; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 18, 20 and 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148A - Order 38, Rule 5 - Order 39; LCIA Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 16 and 226

Reported in : 2007(2)ARBLR133(Delhi); 141(2007)DLT822

of the reserves and surplus considerably enhanced. The petitioner has placed reliance on a letter dated 19th November, 2003 written by Guardian to Mr. Vinay Kumar Modi as Chairman of the joint venture GGL adverting to restructuring … on account of sickness of its partner in a joint venture under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, the underlying shareholders agreement between the parties is rendered frustrated and incapable of implementation. Consequently, the petitioner cannot … by Guardian shows that it has been captioned as an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The arbitration clause which … be granted. (Ref: : AIR1998Delhi397 Global Co. v. National Fertilisers Ltd.; : 117(2005)DLT183 Mala Kumar Engineers Pvt. Ltd. (MKE) v. B. Seenaiah and Co. (Projects)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2013

Puttamma and ors. Vs. K.L.Narayana Reddy and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-09-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

to the injuries.4. His wife and children preferred the claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act, 1988), claiming compensation of Rs.30,00,000/-. The 2nd respondent (Insurance Company) contested

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 2008

Mahesh Kumar Singhal and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-01-2008

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Reported in : 2008(1)MPLJ272

Counsel for the appellant vehemently argued and submitted that the bye-laws are also contrary to the provisions of Section 117 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 1988'). It was further submitted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 2015

CADD Centre Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, City Circle -II ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-01-2015

Subject : Direct Taxation

(L.K.S. Gold House (P.) Ltd. v. L.K.S. Gold Palace) (Application No. 376 of 2004and C.S. No. 934 of 2003) "The question arose in the above case was, whether inasmuch as plaintiff-company had come to be incorporated under … to pay tax. It is not so in this case. (vi) (2001) 117 Taxman 50 (AP) (Rajalakshmi Trading Company v. Commissioner of Income Tax) "In … alone, whether there is a "transfer" as contemplated under Section 2(47) and Section 45(4) of the Income Tax Act and whether the Assessee is liable to be taxed, are the issues canvassed in this case. 1.1 Under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

P.Arimutharasu Vs. 1.The Superintending Engineer

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

in terms of Section 13 of the Telegraphic Act, 1885 read with Section 51 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, no notice is required to be issued to the owner of the lands before erecting towers nor consent … Project) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Tirunelveli-627 011 2.The Assistant Engineer Transmission Line Construction-I Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Valliyoor-627 117 3.The Junior Engineer Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Koodankulam, Tirunelveli District 4.M/s.Leitner Shriram Manufacturing Ltd., D-17, SIPCOT Industrial Complex

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial