Advanced Search Results

Gurushanth Pattedar Vs. Mahaboob Shahi Kulburga Mills and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 228; ;Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 9 and 10; ;Industrial Disputes Act; ;Karnataka High Court (Amendment) Act, 1973; Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 - Rules 2 and 26; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR2005Kant377; ILR2005KAR2503; 2005(6)KarLJ270

jurisdiction. In the case of Sadhana Lodh v. National Insurance Co. Ltd., 2003 AIR SCW 930 reported in the three Judge Bench of the Hon'ble … Hon'ble Supreme Court has clearly observed that where remedy for filing a Revision before the High Court under Section 115 of CPC has been expressly barred by the State enactment, only in such case a petition under Article … petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution is appealable under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and whether the Full Bench Judgment of this Court in Ritz

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Chennai Vs. M ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

the PPA however, was not adopted by the State Commission in terms of Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003. But, the PPA was forwarded by the Appellant to the State Commission along with a covering letter on … agreement which has arisen from the correspondences referred to above. The doctrine of legal estoppels as defined in Section 115 of the Evidence Act is also applicable to the Respondent. 12. The finding of the State Commission on

Pawan Kapoor vs Registrar of Cooperative Socities & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the membership of the petitioner vide orderdated 05.07.2001, against which a revision was preferred under Section 80 of the DCS Act, 1972 before the Financial Commissioner on 23.08.2001. The Financial Commissioner dismissed the revision petition vide order dated 17.08.2007 … passed by the Financial Commissioner in Review petition being Case No. 102/2019 and Case No. 103/2019 filed under Section 115 of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003.3. The brief background of the present petitions is that there were

Panna Lal Kapoor Since Deceased Through Legal Representative Parveen K ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the membership of the petitioner vide orderdated 05.07.2001, against which a revision was preferred under Section 80 of the DCS Act, 1972 before the Financial Commissioner on 23.08.2001. The Financial Commissioner dismissed the revision petition vide order dated 17.08.2007 … passed by the Financial Commissioner in Review petition being Case No. 102/2019 and Case No. 103/2019 filed under Section 115 of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003.3. The brief background of the present petitions is that there were

Tulip Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Trade Wings Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Arbitration

the third respondent before Debt Recovery Tribunal, Delhi sometime in the year 2003. According to the petitioners, the petitioner no.2 using his good Officers had … 1. By this revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the petitioners/original claimants are challenging the judgment and order dated 13/01/2015 passed … 6/07/2013 passed by the learned Arbitrator upholding an objection raised under Section 16(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('The Act', for short) and thereby rejecting the claim filed by the petitioners. 2. The facts necessary

Baboo @ Surendra Gadekar Vs. Jivottam Krishna Naik, (since deceased) b ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Education

It was contended that on 07/07/2003, the petitioner had sent Rs.900/- representing rent for the period from April, 2003 to June 2003, but the same was refused. Again, on 12/09/2003, the petitioner sent Rs.600/- which was also … also very doubtful. (j) It may be true that a statutory amendment of a rather cognate provision, like Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code by the Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Act, 1999 does not and cannot cut

Anas Abdul Rashid MachiswalA. Vs. State of Gujarat.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act - Section 3[1][3], 4, 20, 21[2][b], 22[3], 51, 23, 32; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 307; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act - Sections 3, 4; Bombay Police Act - Sections 135[1], 130; Explosive Substance Act - Sections 4, 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 219, 164, 311; Evidence Act - Section 30; Constitution of India - Article 21; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act - Section 15

involve common question of law and arise from the common judgment rendered in POTA Case No. 7 of 2003 and 9 of 2003, they are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.2. It is pertinent … who are convicted by the Special [POTA] Court and sentenced under Section 3[1] of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 ["POTA" for short] to undergo RI for a period of ten years and fine of Rs. 5000/- … to note that Criminal Appeal Nos. 1148 of 2006, 1149 of 2006, 1150 of 2006, 1151 of 2006 and 1155 of 2006 are preferred by

Sitaram @ Mahendra Ghosh and ors. Vs. Sri Antaryami Mohapatra and 18 o ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 and 115(1)

Reported in : 96(2003)CLT762; 2003(II)OLR409

Matched in: Citation 96(2003)CLT762; 2003(II)OLR409

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line

Ramai Ranjan Pati Vs. Mst. Sahanaj Fatima

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 9, 47, 96, 104 and 115 - Order 43, Rule 1; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 2(2) and 47; Orissa House Rent Control Act, 1967 - Sections 7

Reported in : 98(2004)CLT636

Code is not appealable. This aspect was considered against non-maintainability of appeal but maintainability of a Revision under Section 115 of the Code, in the case of Mst. Sarabai Agarwalla and Ors. v. Haradhan Mohapatra and Anr., AIR … ground in the appeal.'On analysis of the provision of law in Section 7 of the House Rent Control Act, 1967 learned Additional District Judge, recorded the finding that the House Rent Controller had no jurisdiction to pass