Advanced Search Results

Nand Kishor vs the Registrar of Cooperative Society & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the future. [...] (iv) In regard to the CBI investigated societies, the special order under Section 127 of the DCS Act, 2003 needs to also lay down that till such time as the particular society gets a clean chit from … and they have been deprived of membership - despite being the original members. 29. In terms of the Section 112 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003, all the aggrieved persons are free to file an appeal against

Madan Gopal Agarwal vs Registrar of Co-Opeartive Societies & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

cases for the future. [...](iv) In regard to the CBI investigated societies, thespecial order under Section 127 of the DCS Act, 2003 needs to also lay down that till such time as the particular society gets a clean chit from … hearing and they have been deprived of membership - despite being the original members.29. In terms of the Section 112 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003, all the aggrieved persons are free to file an appeal against

The Naval Technical Officers Cghs Ltd vs the Registrar of Cooperative ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

cases for the future. [...](iv) In regard to the CBI investigated societies, thespecial order under Section 127 of the DCS Act, 2003 needs to also lay down that till such time as the particular society gets a clean chit from … hearing and they have been deprived of membership - despite being the original members.29. In terms of the Section 112 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003, all the aggrieved persons are free to file an appeal against

Naval Technical Officers Co-Operative Group Housing Society Limited vs ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

cases for the future. [...](iv) In regard to the CBI investigated societies, thespecial order under Section 127 of the DCS Act, 2003 needs to also lay down that till such time as the particular society gets a clean chit from … hearing and they have been deprived of membership - despite being the original members.29. In terms of the Section 112 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003, all the aggrieved persons are free to file an appeal against

Shri Nar Singh Awatar & Ors. vs the Registrar of Co-Operative Soci ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

in the society. In this connection, there is a specific provision of joint membership as per provisions of DCS Act, 1972. Inorder to avoid any complication, the first member has aright to vote The defaulters' list is required … against the inspection/inquiry reports of the Registrar Cooperative Society. It is submitted that revision u/s 116 of RCS Act, 2003 is not maintainable against enquiry report. In any case, the said remedy is not efficacious as is evident … writ petitions are an abuse of process of law as the Petitioner ought to have availed remedies under Section 112 of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003.19. The Resident Welfare Association namely, Anand Niketan ResidentsWelfare Association (ANRWA) has

Anand Niketan Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. vs Asstt. Registrar (H/ ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

in the society. In this connection, there is a specific provision of joint membership as per provisions of DCS Act, 1972. Inorder to avoid any complication, the first member has aright to vote The defaulters' list is required … against the inspection/inquiry reports of the Registrar Cooperative Society. It is submitted that revision u/s 116 of RCS Act, 2003 is not maintainable against enquiry report. In any case, the said remedy is not efficacious as is evident … thewrit petitions are an abuse of process of law as the Petitioner ought to have availed remedies under Section 112 of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003.19. The Resident Welfare Association namely, Anand Niketan ResidentsWelfare Association (ANRWA) has

Preeti Daga and Others Vs. Cc, New Delhi

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

he used to attend work of Sri Anil Goyel for customs clearance of consignments from 1999 till July 2003. But he could not say when and why name of M/s Maya Trading was changed to M/s Aman … of M/s. Devsons. (9). Personal penalty of Rs. Ten Lakh was imposed on Shri Mukesh Kumar Gupta under section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. (10). Personal penalty of Rs. Four Lakh was imposed on Shri Gagan Thapar

Commissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai Vs. P. Sinnasamy and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

a place and everything is in its place." (xi) In Balram Kumawat v. Union of India reported in 2003 (7) SCC 628, the Supreme Court held that, Contextual reading is a well-known proposition of interpretation of statute. … be confiscated under Section 111(d)(i)(l) and (m) of the Customs Act, 1962, and (iv) Why personal penalty under Section 112(a) of the Custom Act, 1962, should not be imposed on Shri.Paraman Sinnasamy. 5. Though the 1st respondent had

T.Elavarasan Vs. the Commissioner of Customs and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 110, 112, 125(1), 79(2); Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992

goods could be made by invoking Section 111 of the said Act. Further, penalty could be levied, under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, for improper importation of goods. Since, the petitioner is the importer of the

The Commissioner of Customs Vs. Shri M. Naushad, Appraiser of

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)(114)ECC379

be sustained in law. Further, the Tribunal in the case of Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai v. M. Vasi 2003 155 ELT (312) held that "abetment presupposes the knowledge of the proposed offence and also presupposes the benefit … summing up the records had clearly noted that the Revenue has not produced any evidence of abetting under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, which clearly lays down that the person to be charged under Section 112(a) should