Advanced Search Results

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

the appellant for amendment of the MYT Regulations,2009 cannot at all be the subject matter of challenge under Section 111 of the Act. c) The Tribunal has no authority or jurisdiction to sit on judgment on the on … found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue

Emmar Mgf Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Comm ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

contending that the appellant is not a person aggrieved within the meaning of Section 111 of the Electricity Act 2003, hereinafter referred to as the Act. 7) The respondent No.2 also contests the appeal assailing the locus standi

Ishwar Singh Anr Ors. Vs.the Registrar of Co-Operative Societies and O ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

further conveyed/directed that erstwhile Managing It Committee should not be disqualified on the pretext of section 35(7)(d) of DCS Act 2003 as this Committee is not responsible for the delay in the audit for the period of 2014-15. This … the committee and shall be recoverable from them as an arrears of land revenue as provided in Section 111.7. ………………………….8. ………………………… 9. ………………………….” the Registrar shall get 12. A reading of the aforesaid provisions makes it clear

Commissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai Vs. P. Sinnasamy and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

a place and everything is in its place." (xi) In Balram Kumawat v. Union of India reported in 2003 (7) SCC 628, the Supreme Court held that, Contextual reading is a well-known proposition of interpretation of statute. … broken bits of gold biscuits totally weighting 2548.3 grams valued at Rs.10,34,355/- (M.V.) should not be confiscated under Section 111(d)(i)(l) and (m) of the Customs Act, 1962. (ii) Why the material objects such as aluminum foil, black gum

South India Exports Rep. by Its Partner Mr. Indermal Ramani Vs. the Jo ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Foreign Trade (Development and Reguation) Act, 1992 - Sections 3, 11(1) and 11(2); Indian Customs Act - Sections 108; Sea Customs Act - Sections 167; Foreign Trade (Development and Reguation) Rules

Reported in : 2004(91)ECC555; (2004)1MLJ489

SAMPAT RAJ DUGAR : 1992(58)ELT163(SC) and TITAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI : 2003(151)ELT254(SC) that there could be no parallel proceedings and, therefore, there would be no necessity of proceeding even with … 111(o) of the Customs Act and came to the conclusion in paragraphs 8 and 9 in the following words:'Section 111(o) states that when goods are exempted from customs duty subject to a condition and the condition is not

icici Venture Funds Management Vs. Sofil Information Systems

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)6CompLJ134

the respondents 2 to 4, have transferred their entire shareholding in the Company dehors the petitioner, in June, 2003 in favour of the seventh respondent, upon which its name has been entered in the register of members … 1. This company petition is filed under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") seeking directions against M/s SOFIL Information Systems Private Limited ("the Company")

The Commissioner of Customs Vs. Shri M. Naushad, Appraiser of

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)(114)ECC379

be sustained in law. Further, the Tribunal in the case of Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai v. M. Vasi 2003 155 ELT (312) held that "abetment presupposes the knowledge of the proposed offence and also presupposes the benefit … done or abetting to do any act which act or omission would render such goods for confiscation under Section 111 or abets the doing or omission of such an act". The Section 112(b) has noted above also deals

Preeti Daga and Others Vs. Cc, New Delhi

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

he used to attend work of Sri Anil Goyel for customs clearance of consignments from 1999 till July 2003. But he could not say when and why name of M/s Maya Trading was changed to M/s Aman … table below. Both sets of appeals are dealt by this common order in view of similar cause of action and common investigation resulting in similar consequences. Both sides could not inform whether other persons/concerns against whom adjudication … and Shri Ram Kishan Tiwari, the Proprietor of M/s.Maya Trading Co., under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 read with proviso to the Section … Anil Goel 149/2006 5,81,813 Pieces of bearings valued at Rs.10,43,765/-were confiscated u/s 111(d),(f),(l)and (m) and Customs Duty of Rs.5,30,233/- u/s 28 became recoverable. Fine of

Madras Medical Care and Health Vs. Devaki Hospital Limited and ors.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Land Acquisition

be in-charge of affairs of the Company do not survive. The High Court in C.S. No. 562 of 2003 prima facie found that the second respondent violated Section 295 of the Act-and consequently restrained her from (a) … are estopped from questioning the terms of lease, as evidenced by the unregistered lease deeds. By virtue of Section 111(f) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 a lease of immovable property determines, by implied surrender. The explanation

Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

with Notification No. 27/2002 dated 1.3.2002. The effective rate of duty is computed at 0.75% (15% of 5%) actually payable in cash and for the balance 4.25% (85% of 5%) the Bank Guarantees were furnished. (iii) Old … AS imported into vessels for coastal run which was allowed as also Port Clearance under the provisions of Section 42 of the Customs Act, 1962 was applied for and granted by the proper officer at Mumbai Custom … present proceedings were commenced which culminated in a confiscation order under Section 111(j) of the Customs Act, 1962, as regards the vessels, stores and consumables