Advanced Search Results

Naresh Lachmandas Aswani Vs. Haridas Alias Hardas Lachmandas and Other ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 2007 in Bombay City Civil Court at Dindoshi for cancellation of Letter of Intent dated 12th October, 2003 issued by the Secretary, Slum Rehabilitation and Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as 'SRA') for a direction to … brother of defendant no.1. defendant Nos.2 and 3 are the companies incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. According to the plaintiff, defendant nos. 2 and 3 have been impleaded as party defendants as they … 26th July, 2012 passed by this court, two issues were framed under section 9A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in Notice of Motion

Preeti Daga and Others Vs. Cc, New Delhi

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

he used to attend work of Sri Anil Goyel for customs clearance of consignments from 1999 till July 2003. But he could not say when and why name of M/s Maya Trading was changed to M/s Aman … table below. Both sets of appeals are dealt by this common order in view of similar cause of action and common investigation resulting in similar consequences. Both sides could not inform whether other persons/concerns against whom adjudication … and Shri Ram Kishan Tiwari, the Proprietor of M/s.Maya Trading Co., under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 read with proviso to the Section … appellants as appearing in the table below: Consequence arose under O-I-O No. 105/2005 dated: 30.11.2005 against allegations in SCN No. 338/XIV/96/2003 Dt. 30.04.2004 Consequence arose

Tata Motors Limited and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : Singur Land Rehabilitation & Development Act, 2011 - Sections 8, 9 ; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 23, 3(a), 7, 24, 17, 50(2), 11A; Impugned Act - Sections 5(2), 3, 4(3); Singur Act. - Section 5(2); Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 (BDA Act) - Section 36; Constitution Of India - Article 254, 254(1)

and to remove and appropriate that mineral, is a ‘right to enjoy immovable property’ within the meaning of Section 105; more so, when it is coupled with a right to be in its exclusive khas possession for a … a judgment and/or order dated 28th September, 2011. The appellants have challenged the Singur Land Rehabilitation & Development Act, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said Act’) and the rules framed thereunder before the Hon’ble Single Judge … persons who unwillingly delivered up their land during the acquisition process of 2003.52. It is pointed out that the intention of the legislature through that

Tata Motors Limited and Others Vs. the State of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

persons who unwillingly delivered up their land during the acquisition process of 2003. 45. It is pointed out that the intention of the legislature through … and to remove and appropriate that mineral, is a ‘right to enjoy immovable property’ within the meaning of Section 105; more so, when it is coupled with a right to be in its exclusive khas possession for a … a judgment and/or order dated 28th September, 2011. The appellants have challenged the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said Act’) and the rules framed thereunder before the Hon’ble Single Judge

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time … 341; Cox and Kings Ltd v. SAP India Pvt Ltd, 2023 INSC 1051 : [2023] 15 SCR 621; Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical

New Tirupur Area Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. K.Poomani

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of any order issued by the Government under Section 9 of the Tamil Nadu Groundwater (Development and Management) Act 2003, neither the Revenue Authorities nor the Police Authorities got any power to obstruct the petitioner from drawing ground … in W.A.No.923 of 2009 6. M/s.Kamala Corporation, rep. by its Proprietor, S.Pazhamalai, No.353, Main Road, Pennadam  606 105 Cuddalore District. (R4 impleaded vide order dated 28.7.2009, R5 impleaded vide order dated 1.7.2013 & R6 impleaded vide

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line … of the learned single Judge, has been affirmed by the Hon'ble First Bench of this Court in W.A.No.1049, 1050 and 1051 of 2012, by judgment, dated 16.11.2012 and that therefore, the issue involved in W.P.No.23442 of 2012,

Rashidul Jafar @ Chota Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

4 15-02- 1238/2003 04-01- 25 Year 32 Year 52 Year ------ 1- Form- A Pending S/O RAJVEER C.R.No-162, 2003 Decided 2005 10 Mth. 02 Mth. 4 Mth. at D.M Level. SINGH1741997, 13 day 22 day 2- Proposal … U/S- 05 Day 03 Day 21.06.2022 under 307/34,302/34,I.P.C Permanent Policy. P.S.-Delhi ate,Aligarh 105 MADHAV S.T.No-923/2005 M u r d e r 16-09- 6992/2006 Pending 17 … A / Nominal Number (Murder n No.With Criminal Hon’ble Roll / Jail Policy / Cases 1, Filing Appeal Actual With Supreme Mercy Petition 2, 3 or Date With Remiss Court more Judgment ion Murders / Date Kidnapin … life and are incarcerated in prison, whose crime is covered by the sections mentioned in prohibited category in sub-rule-(vi), (viii) and (ix) of para- 3

Jude (Respondent) Vs. Her Majesty's Advocate (Appellant) (Scotland), H ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

with intent to rape, a breach of the peace and a contravention of section 127(1)(a) of the Communications Act 2003 by sending sexually explicit messages to a female complainer. He pled guilty to the statutory offence during the … evidence, or within such longer period as the court considered equitable having regard to all the circumstances: paras 105-106. I endorsed what he said in those paragraphs in para 60 of my own judgment, when I included

Narayan Diwakar vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

good faith and had taken necessary steps in precaution and contended that in terms of Rule 105 of DCS Act, he was duty bound to revoke the winding up of all proceedings.8. The appellant who is in custody … Page 1 of 20 judgment dated 22.12.2017 was convicted for the commission of the offences punishable  under Sections 419/468/471 as well as 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 r/w Section 120 B of the Indian