Advanced Search Results
Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...
Supreme Court of India
Nov-08-2024
Arbitration
[2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641
and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … v. State of Orissa [1985] 1 SCR 322 : (1984) 4 SCC 103; A K Roy v. Union of India [1982] 2 SCR 272 : … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBihar Chamber of Commerce Vs. Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
May-28-2014
Education
The Appeal No. 131 of 2012 has been preferred by the Appellant under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the Order dated 30.3.2012 passed by the Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter called the State Commission) in … We observe that the same Bench of the Appellate Tribunal, consisting of both of us, in Appeal No. 103 of 2013 vide judgment dated 11.3.2014 in the matter of Bihar Industries Association vs. BERC and Ors. had
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company (Appellant) Vs. the Min ...
UK Supreme Court
Nov-03-2010
Arbitration
in China Minmetals Materials Import and Export Co Ltd v Chei Mei Corpn, 334 F3d 274 (3d Cir 2003) enforcement of a Chinese award was resisted on the ground that the agreement was a forgery. See also … 2010. Article V(1)(a) of the New York Convention is transposed in England and Wales and Northern Ireland by section 103 of the 1996 Act, which provides: "(1) Recognition or enforcement of a New York Convention award shall not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rajhan Narendra Raut Vs. The State Of Maharashtra Urban Development De ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-25-2022
Land Acquisition
subject land.4. The Principal Secretary, UD Department wrote to the Advocate General of the State on 3rd September, 2003 for obtaining legal advice on the above aspect. The said letter highlighted inter-alia the fact that the parcel … waterworks, PSP and residential Zone) On or Towards : By Survey No, 103, 104 (Hilltop South Hill Slope and PSP Zone and residential Zone at … was shown in the ‘Hill Top/Hill Slope’ zone in the Development Plan under the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 19964. Respondent No.3/Pune Municipal Corporation5 invoked Section 126 of the Town Planning Act that permits acquisition of land
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAirports Authority of India Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board
Delhi
May-31-2011
Municipalities
Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 68(1), 103, 69, 71, 64(a)(b), 84; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Section 126; Constitution of India - Article 226
2003 raised by the DCB calling upon AAI to pay Rs. 20,12,06,539/- as house tax under the Cantonments Act, 1924 (CA, 1924) for the period 1st April 1998 to 31st May 2002. 2. On 26th May 2003, … buildings as provided by AAI by its letter dated 6th June 1983 in response to the notice under Section 103 of the CA, 1924 and the valuation as on 1st April 1982 i.e. Rs. 4,61,95,650/-. Since the actual
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMalad Kokil Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and Another Vs. the Mode ...
Mumbai
Sep-07-2012
Land Acquisition
that clause (2) of the said letter dated 30th August 2003 (page 103) would mean to be informed consent for all construction activities to be … learned Counsel submits that the learned trial Judge has totally misinterpreted the so called settlement dated 30th August, 2003. The learned Counsel submits that the said settlement has to be read in conjunction with various other documents … It is the contention of the plaintiff-society that after they pursued the matter under the Right to Information Act, they came to know about the Commencement Certificate granted in favour of the defendants by the Corporation on … in the property within the period mentioned in the agreement executed under Section 4 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...
Chennai
Nov-29-2013
Land Acquisition
Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPawan Kapoor vs Registrar of Cooperative Socities & Ors.
Delhi
Apr-16-2026
Land Acquisition
the membership of the petitioner vide orderdated 05.07.2001, against which a revision was preferred under Section 80 of the DCS Act, 1972 before the Financial Commissioner on 23.08.2001. The Financial Commissioner dismissed the revision petition vide order dated 17.08.2007 … being Case No. 102/2019 and Case No. 103/2019 filed under Section 115 of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003.3. The brief background of the present petitions is that there were three brothers - Mr. Kewal Kishan Kapoor,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaresh Lachmandas Aswani Vs. Haridas Alias Hardas Lachmandas and Other ...
Mumbai
Oct-18-2013
Land Acquisition
of 2007 in Bombay City Civil Court at Dindoshi for cancellation of Letter of Intent dated 12th October, 2003 issued by the Secretary, Slum Rehabilitation and Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as 'SRA') for a direction to … 106, Article 110, Article 101, Section 9, Section 3, Article 113 - Indian Evidence Act - Section 102, Section 103 , Section 101 - Companies Act, 1956 - Whether jurisdiction of this court is barred under Section 42
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKirloskar Electric Co Ltd Vs. The State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-10-2018
Land Acquisition
passed by the 2nd Respondent under Section 39(1) read with Section 36(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, for the tax periods April 2009 to March 2010 are ex facie illegal and unsustainable & etc., W.P.Nos.26349-26360/2017: … March 2010 are ex facie illegal and unsustainable & etc., W.P.Nos.26349-26360/2017: Between: Micromatic Grinding Technologies Ltd., No.5/A, Sy.No.71, 103, 106 & 107 Date of Judgment 10-01-2018 W.P.Nos.58917-58928/2016 and Connected Matters Kirloskar Electric Co. Ltd. & Ors. Vs.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »