Advanced Search Results

Beta Wind Farm (P) Limited Chennai and Others Vs. Tamil Nadu Electrici ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

Wind Energy has been given in the Regulations 2008 as well as in Section 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 33. Let us now refer to those Regulations and provisions of the Act,2003. 34. The relevant Regulation is … decided as against the Appellant. 101. The Fifth Issue is regarding Annual Maintenance Contract Charges and Insurance Charges. 102. According to the Appellants, the actual annual maintenance contract charges with insurance charges works out to 2.8% of

Naresh Lachmandas Aswani Vs. Haridas Alias Hardas Lachmandas and Other ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 2007 in Bombay City Civil Court at Dindoshi for cancellation of Letter of Intent dated 12th October, 2003 issued by the Secretary, Slum Rehabilitation and Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as 'SRA') for a direction to … 59, Article 106, Article 110, Article 101, Section 9, Section 3, Article 113 - Indian Evidence Act - Section 102, Section 103 , Section 101 - Companies Act, 1956 - Whether jurisdiction of this court is barred under

The Capital Cooperative Thrift Credit Society Ltd & Ors. vs Regist ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

elections was declared on 15th December, 2024. 7. Thereafter, claims came to be filed under section 70 of the DCS Act, 2003, by Respondents No. 3 to 15 on the ground that the nominations were wrongly rejected. In the said … 2019. The challenge to the said award is still pending before the Delhi Cooperative Tribunal vide appeal No. 102/2019, titled ‘Satish Kumar Vs. Registrar Cooperative Societies’. 6. Upon the nominations being rejected, there was withdrawal of nomination

Amar Jeet & Ors. vs Registrar Cooperative Societies & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

revised the maintenance charges without approval of the General body in contravention of Section 89 and 93 of the DCS Act, 2003 and Rule 102(2) & (3) of the DCS Rules, 2007. Further, the inclusion of non-primary members in the

T.Subbulakshmi Vs. Commissioner of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

the attention of this Court to Sub-Clause 3 to Section 102 of Cr.P.C.and submitted that every Police Officer acting under Sub-section (1) to Section 102, shall forthwith report the seizure to the Magistrate having jurisdiction and that … learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners relied upon the judgment reported in 2003 Crl.L.J2779(B.Ranganathan versus State and otheRs.in support of his contention that as per … bank accounts. 7.The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners by inviting the attention of this Court to Section 102 of Cr.P.C., which deals with the powers of the Police Officer to seize certain property, submitted that if

Bihar Chamber of Commerce Vs. Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Education

The Appeal No. 131 of 2012 has been preferred by the Appellant under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the Order dated 30.3.2012 passed by the Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter called the State Commission) in … or voltage-wise cost of supply. This Tribunal in the various judgments including judgment dated 30.5.2011 in Appeal no. 102 of 2010 and batch in the matter of Tata Steel Vs. Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission has clearly held

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Samarendra Nath Mukherjee

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20, 30, 33 and 37(3); ;Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 16 and 34

was appointed the railway took the plea as would appear from the judgment and order dated November 25, 2003. They could not succeed. They also did not go higher up. On both the occasions, they appeared before … settlement of the final bill. The respondent approached the Court of law under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 inter alia praying for filing of the arbitration agreement in Court and appointment of an arbitrator in

Shelby County Vs. Holder

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

See Order in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Texas, No. 06-cv-1046 (WD Tex.), Doc. 8. In 2003, after African-Americans won a majority of the seats on the school board for the first time in history, … for the district of columbia circuit No. 12-96. Argued February 27, 2013-Decided June 25, 2013 The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was enacted to address entrenched racial discrimination in voting, “an insidious and pervasive evil which had … of the Constitution.” South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U. S. 301 . Section 2 of the Act, which bans any “standard, practice, or procedure” that

V-can Network (P) Ltd., Represented by Its Chairman Cum Managing Direc ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CommercialCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : II(2004)BC182; [2004]118CompCas280(Mad); 2003CriLJ3971

Matched in: Advocate R. Gandhi, Senior counsel for ;A. Natarajan, Adv. in W.P. 2908/2003 and ;Ar.L. Sundaresan, Adv. in WP No. 4144/2003 K. Abudu Kumar Rajaaratnam, Govt. Adv.