Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the dcs act 2003 section 101 · Page 1 of about 260 results (0.074 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 16 2003

Subhash Gupta (individual) Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Decided on : Jan-16-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)78TTJ(JP.)692

Matched in: Citation (2003)78TTJ(JP.)692

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2013

K.Srinivasa Rao Vs. S.Narayanan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-20-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

the land along with the proportionate undivided share in the land, having purchased the same in the year 2003. From the time of purchase, the defendant has not been co-operating with the other residents of the building … writ petition and not to file the civil suit. In this regard, a reference could be placed in Section 101 of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act. Section 101_ Bar of jurisdiction of Courts:- Any decision or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2004

Leocal Vs. Ashcroft

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Nov-09-2004

Subject : Land Acquisition

for heightened punishment and other crimes. See United States v. Lucio-Lucio , 347 F. 3d 1202, 1205-1206 (CA10 2003). Section 16 therefore cannot be read to include petitioner’s conviction for DUI causing serious bodily injury under Florida law.[ … sentence, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) initiated removal proceedings pursuant to §237(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which permits deportation of an alien convicted of “an aggravated felony.” INA §101(a)(43)(F) defines “aggravated felony” to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 18 2013

Naresh Lachmandas Aswani Vs. Haridas Alias Hardas Lachmandas and Other ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-18-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 2007 in Bombay City Civil Court at Dindoshi for cancellation of Letter of Intent dated 12th October, 2003 issued by the Secretary, Slum Rehabilitation and Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as 'SRA') for a direction to … the fact that the Suit is filed by the Plaintiffs within the period of limitation. In view thereof, Section 101 of the Indian Evidence Act would also come into play, which provides that whoever desires any Court to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2005

O'Brien (Respondent) Vs. Chief Constable of South Wales Police (Appell ...

Court : House of Lords

Decided on : Apr-28-2005

Subject : Right to Information

Lordships' House. They are now to be found codified in sections 101 to 106 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 ('the 2003 Act'), which were brought into effect in December last year. 13. Not infrequently a defendant in … of your Lordships' House. They are now to be found codified in sections 101 to 106 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 ('the 2003 Act'), … alleged against DI Lewis. Mr O'Brien gave notice of his intention to adduce evidence designed to demonstrate that DCS Carsley had behaved with similar impropriety on one other occasion and that DI Lewis had done so on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2013

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-29-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2014

Suresh Bhimsen Sethi Vs. Gajanan Grihataran Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

Decided on : Jan-23-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Finance Corporation having outstanding loan amount of Rs 1,07,954.48 started recovery proceedings U/Sec. 101 of the Cooperative Society Act, 1960 against the complainant. That, further the said opponent finance corporation issued the attachment order dated 22/09/2003 inspite

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2016

K. Vijayakumar Vs. State rep. by Dy. S.P Vigilance and Anti Corruption ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-08-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

2140), Kajal Dey v. State of Tripura (2014 KHC 3518), Manilal v. State of Kerala (1998 (2) KLT 101) and Roshan Lal Rainav. State of Jammu and Kashmir (1983 (2) SCC 429) in support of his case. … VACB, Palakkad alleging offences under sections 13(1)(c) and 13(1)(d) read with section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'P.C.Act'), 1988 and sections 409, 465 and 477 A of the Indian Penal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2022

Rashidul Jafar @ Chota Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-06-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

4 15-02- 1238/2003 04-01- 25 Year 32 Year 52 Year ------ 1- Form- A Pending S/O RAJVEER C.R.No-162, 2003 Decided 2005 10 Mth. 02 Mth. 4 Mth. at D.M Level. SINGH1741997, 13 day 22 day 2- Proposal … Megistrate, MISHRA IPC Of Hon’bl`e Shajhanpur Court CJM, Shajhanpur on dated-29- 06-2022 101 AJAY KUMAR S.T. No-15/05, 14/05 1 Murder 26-04-06 Criminal Criminal 17 Years … A / Nominal Number (Murder n No.With Criminal Hon’ble Roll / Jail Policy / Cases 1, Filing Appeal Actual With Supreme Mercy Petition 2, 3 or Date With Remiss Court more Judgment ion Murders / Date Kidnapin … life and are incarcerated in prison, whose crime is covered by the sections mentioned in prohibited category in sub-rule-(vi), (viii) and (ix) of para- 3

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2003

Sushil Singh Vs. Prabhu NaraIn Yadav and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-17-2003

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 Sections 81, 82, 83, 86, 86(4), 100 and 101; Conduct of Election Rules - Rule 94A

Reported in : AIR2003All331

any of the grounds required to be disclosed under Sections 100 and 101 of the Representation of People Act, 1951. The petitioner has also not … not complied with the provisions of Sections 81, 82 , 83 and 117 of the Representation of People Act, 1951. According to him, the election petitioner has not disclosed any of the grounds required to be disclosed … and it is liable to be dismissed as the election petitioner has not complied with the provisions of Sections 81, 82 , 83 and 117 of the Representation of People Act, 1951. According to him, the election

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial