Advanced Search Results

Webcity Infosys Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Companies (Delhi and Haryana)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468(2); Mines Act 1952 - Sections 66; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 150, 159, 160, 161, 162, 162(1), 205(8), 205A, 205A(1), 205A(2), 205A(8), 234 and 598; Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulations - Regulation 3

Reported in : 2007(98)DRJ710

punishable with only fine, limitation would be 6 months by virtue of Section 468(2)(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, prosecution states that though limitation would be 6 months but since it is a continuing cause of … limitation would be 6 months by virtue of Section 468(2)(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, prosecution states that though limitation would be 6 … all.7. Their Lordships of the Supreme Court were considering Regulation 3 of the Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulations and Section 66 of the Mines Act 1952. In para 9 of the report it was opined as under:9. Reg. 3

Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81, 83

appeals filed by the State are allowed. [ P. SATHASIVAM; JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, … 1281 of 2012 whereby the High Court dismissed his application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘the Code’) seeking regular bail in C.R. No. 252 of 2009 registered with Odhav Police … of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’ for short) and Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81 and 83 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.3)

Smt. Mallamma Vs. the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 66, 233 and 482

Reported in : ILR2004KAR157

attendance of the witness - Dr. Krishnappa and then proceed with the case in accordance with law. (A) CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 (CENTRAL ACT No. 2 OF 1974) - SECTIONS 66, 233 --BAILABLE WARRANT -- Returned with endorsement that … then proceed with the case in accordance with law. (A) CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 (CENTRAL ACT No. 2 OF 1974) - SECTIONS 66, 233 --BAILABLE … up. In this regard, it must be stated that Dr. Krishnappa being a government Servant, the provisions of Section 66 of the Cr.P.C. had to be followed and the learned Sessions Judge had not followed the said procedure

Selvaraj, S/O Gnanadesihan Vs. P. Viswanathan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Banking Food Adulteration

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 -- Sections 138 and 142; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 29, 167(2), and 325(1); Banking Public Financial Institution and Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amended) Act, 1988 (Act 66 of 1988) -- Sections 139, 140, 141 and 142; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 -- Sections 25, 26, 190, 200, 207, 262 to 265, 347, 372 to 379 and 468(1); Supreme Court Advocates (Practice in High Courts) Act, 1951 -- Sections 2; Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 -- Sections 4(2) and 8(1), 9(4), 14(3) and 15; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 -- Sections 20, 27, 36-A, 37 and 51; Criminal Justice Act, 1948 -- Sections 23; Special Court Act, 1982 -- Sections 11(1); Constitution of India, Articles 132, 133, 134 and 136; Preventio

Reported in : 1999(2)ALD(Cri)438; 1999CriLJ4766; 1999(2)CTC652

of fine than the limit spelt out from the relevant provision regarding the powers of such Magistrate under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 in respect of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.'2. The following factual … the limit spelt out from the relevant provision regarding the powers of such Magistrate under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 in respect of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.'2. The following factual … Banking Public Financial Institution and Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amended) Act, 1988 (Act 66 of 1988). Section 138 thus introduced runs as under: '138. Dishonour of

Alister Anthony Pareira Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 (IPC) - Sections 304, 338, 337, 279, 336, 337, 338, 427, 299, 300; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 185; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Section 66 (1)(b) ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 313, 464, 342; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Section 4

C.A. Reports and other documents were also proved. 7. The statement of the appellant under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (for short, `the Code') was recorded. He admitted that he was driving the car no. MH-01-R-580 at … under Sections 304 Part II, 338 and 337 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). 2. The prosecution case against the appellant is this: the … Section 304, 279, 336, 337, 338 and 427 IPC; Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Section 66 (1)(b) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. 4. On completion of investigation, the charge sheet was submitted against the

Bhagirath Kanoria and ors. Vs. State of M. P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalLabour and Industrial

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468, 468 (2), 472 and 473

Reported in : AIR1984SC1688; (1984)3CompLJ49(SC); 1984(2)Crimes441(SC); [1984(49)FLR382]; 1984(2)SCALE218; (1984)4SCC222; [1985]1SCR626

to say, without treating any particular point as a preliminary point. Criminal - continuity - Section 468 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - proceedings commenced against appellants for failure to pay employers' contribution - objection raised on ground of … of the trial, the accused filed applications contending that since the limitation prescribed by Section 468 of the CrPC, 1973 (referred to herein as 'the Code'), had expired before the filing of the complaints, the Court had no … before January 21 in each year. Failure to forward the returns as required is punishable with fine Under Section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952. The respondents having failed to furnish the returns by the due date, which

Paramjit Singh Vs. Commissioner of Customs and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397 and 401; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108, 110 and 135(1); Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 66 and 85; Constitution of India - Article 20(3); Evidence Act - Sections 30

Reported in : 2002VIIIAD(Delhi)104; 98(2002)DLT116; 2002(64)DRJ200; 2002(82)ECC547; 2002(143)ELT485(Del)

S.K. Agarwal, J.1. This revision petition under Sections 401/397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is directed against the Order dated 21st February, 2002 framing charge against the petitioner under Section 135(1)(b) … S.K. Agarwal, J.1. This revision petition under Sections 401/397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is directed against the Order dated 21st February, … ten bars (rods) of gold; and they were seized under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 66 of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968. The recovered gold collectively weighed 27.17 kgs. Valued at Rs.57,05,815/-; the driver

Soubhagya Kumar Panda and Ugam Nath Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Subject : Excise

Acts : Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 47, 66, 67 and 68; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 457

Reported in : 96(2003)CLT78; 2003(II)OLR52

(SC) 444 may also be looked into. The Apex Court while considering the Sections 451 and 457 of the Criminal Procedure Code has given guidelines to be followed by the Magistrates while dealing with Section 451 or 457, Cr.P.C. in … the petitioner for release of a motor-cycle under Section 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. From the impugned order it appears that the … that the Collector has the power to direct release of the vehicle, the Division Bench has not considered Section 66 of the Act and decide as to which court will have the power to release a vehicle, if

Kasinath Mohapatra Vs. Annapurna Panda @ Mohapatra

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 66 and 126(2)

Reported in : I(1990)DMC335

few fact may be stated. The opposite party filed a petition under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ('Code' for short) against the petitioner on 6-1-1983 in the court of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhadrak, alleging … stated. The opposite party filed a petition under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ('Code' for short) against the petitioner on 6-1-1983 in … the second petition it was stated that although he was serving under the police department, notice according to Section 66 of the Code was not served on him. He did not also refuse to accept the notice sent

Koshy Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 65, 66, 66(1), 66(2) and 77B; ;Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008; ;Companies Act, 1956; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 82, 83 and 438; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 419 and 420

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT945

77B provides that notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the offence punishable with imprisonment of three years and above shall be … ORDERK.T. Sankaran, J.1. This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, filed by Dr. K.A. Koshy and Dr. Serena, who are two accused persons among the accused in Crime … This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, filed by Dr. K.A. Koshy and Dr. Serena, who … de facto complainant Company, it is seen that one of the offences alleged against the accused is under Section 66(1) and (2) of the Information Technology Act. Section 66 of the Information Technology Act was substituted by Act