Advanced Search Results
P. Philip Vs. the Director of Enforcement, New Delhi and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-03-1976
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 399(3), 435, 438, 484 and 484(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B
AIR1976SC1185; 1976CriLJ920; 1976(0)KLT247(SC); (1976)2SCC174; [1976]3SCR532; 1976(8)LC287(SC)
for disposal with utmost expedition in accordance with law- Criminal - revision - Sections 399 and 484 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - appeal against Order of High Court dismissing criminal revision petition by appellant - appellant contended order … raises questions with regard to the scope and interpretation, inter alia, of Sections 399(3) and 484(2)(a) of the CrPC, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the New Code). The facts are these:2. On February 2,1971 the Director of Enforcement, … and dismissed, without going into the merits, on the ground that it was not maintainable in view of Section 399(3) of the New Code.5. Mr. Raghavan, learned Counsel for the appellant contends that the order under appeal is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurendra Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
May-09-2001
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 311, 397(2), 399(3) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468 and 471
2000(3)WLC654; 2002(1)WLN395
forthwith with a direction to decide the case as early as possible because it is sufficiently delayed. (a) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 311, 397(2), 399(3), 482--Recalling of witness for further cross-examination--Matter pending for over 20 years--Witnesses already … already sufficiently delayed by about 20 years. Perhaps, because of such type of cases only, under the new Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the legislature has incorporated the provisions of Section 397(2) and Section 399(3).13. However, learned
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskY. Chendrasekhara Rao and ors. Vs. Y.V. Kamala Kumari and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-02-1993
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397(3), 399(3), 435, 438, 438(1), 439 and 482; Constitution of India - Article 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 439
1993CriLJ3508
Criminal - anticipatory bail - Sections 397 (3), 399 (3), 435, 438, 438 (1), 439 and 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Article 21 of Constitution of India and Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 - whether it … judicial opinion on the question as to whether it is obligatory that an application under Section of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 should first be filed in the Court of Session 2. All these petitions are
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
indrakumar Faredun Irani and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ot ...
Mumbai
Sep-09-1988
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307 and 411; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 102, 399, 457 and 482
1989(1)BomCR601; 1989MhLJ313
rules granted therein are discharged.12. Petitions dismissed. Criminal - jurisdiction - Sections 102, 399, 457 and 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - petitioner was bonafide purchaser of stolen car - police seized stolen car from his custody - … the custody of those cars when there are specific provisions in the Code of Criminal Procedure authorising the concerned Magistrates to pass orders regarding custody … vested in him or exercises it with material irregularity and the Sessions Judge in the revisional powers under Section 399 Cr.P.C. fails to correct the error, that the party can approach this Court and this Court can certainly
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDamodar Lal Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise and Customs
Rajasthan
Nov-24-1978
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 133A and 135; Defence of India Rules - Rule 126; Gold Control Act, 1968 - Sections 98B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 399
1979(4)ELT142(Raj)
has its own -power to set aside an illegal order. The power of revision conferred by Section 399, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, is one which the Court can exercise suo motu. Even a third party who has an interest … own -power to set aside an illegal order. The power of revision conferred by Section 399, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, is one which the Court can exercise suo motu. Even a third party who has an interest
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalaji Bhaurao Kalbanade Vs. Parubai Bhaguji Warhade and anr.
Mumbai
Sep-19-1983
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125, 125(1), 125(4), 386, 399(1) and 401
1984(1)BomCR61
stands dismissed and the rule is discharged. Criminal - maintenance - Sections 125, 386, 399 and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - wife filed application for maintenance - she used to maintain herself by doing labour work upto … the economic condition of neglected wives and discarded divorcees enacted in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, namely, section 125. The Code of Criminal Procedure, … act as if it is hearing an appeal. 25. Shri Jadhav referred me to the provisions contained in section 399(1) of the 1973 Code and canvassed before me that under this section, the power of the Sessions Judge
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJupally Veeraswamy Vs. Jupally Shantamma and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-08-1996
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125(1), 397(2), 399, 399(3) and 482
1996(2)ALD517; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)545; 1996(2)ALT(Cri)314; 1996(2)APLJ334; 1996CriLJ3209; I(1997)DMC85
Petition dismissed. Criminal - revisionary jurisdiction - Sections 125 (1), 397 (2), 399, 399 (3) and 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - confirmation of Order of Trial Court by Metropolitan Magistrate (MM) sought to be quashed under Section … the revisional orders of the Sessions Judge. However, the High Court certainly has power u/S. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to entertain proceedings when it finds that if the complaint is allowed to be proceeded
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKola Keshava Reddy Vs. Kola Anantha Lakshmi and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-18-1996
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397(2), 399, 399(3) and 482
1996(1)ALD(Cri)683; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)79; 1996(2)ALT(Cri)320; 1997CriLJ933; II(1996)DMC250
is dismissed. 10. Petition dismissed. Criminal - interpretation - Sections 397 (2), 399, 399 (3) and 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Orders of Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class and Session Judge confirming Order of Trial Court … Judge. However, the High Court certainly has power u/S. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to entertain proceedings when it finds that if the … respondents which was granted by Trial Court - revision petition preferred - respondents contended that by virtue of Section 399 (3) no further proceedings by way of revision at instance of petitioner can entertained by High Court or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB. Lakshmaiah Vs. Veeramalli Nagesh and Another
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-11-1998
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 256, 378(5), 397, 399(3) and 482; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5
1999(1)ALD611; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)297; 1999(1)ALT438; 1999CriLJ1107
1996. Hence this appeal is dismissed. Criminal - revision - Sections 399 (3), 378 (5) and 256 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 5 of Limitation Act and Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - private complaint filed … our consideration now is whether the High Court could have utilised the power under Section 482 of the Code and entertained the second revisional application at the instance of the 1 st respondent. Admittedly, the 1st respondent
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandranaika Alias Marvadi and ors. Vs. State by Arasikere Rural Polic ...
Karnataka
Sep-07-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 392, 395, 399 and 400; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313
2007(6)KarLJ572; ILR2007(4)Kar3989; 2007(6)AIRKarR73(DB)
of total denial of the prosecution case. The statements of the accused was recorded under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.4. P.W. 1-Adaveeshappa who is the complainant in the case has stated in his evidence that he is … No. 211 of 2002, convicting the appellants-accused for an offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sentencing them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/- each and … in Crime No. 140 of 2002 for the offences punishable under Sections 399 and 400 of the IPC. On 28-7-2002 at about 3.00 a.m. accused
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »