Advanced Search Results
Abdul Aziz Vs. State of Bihar
Patna
May-15-2006
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian panel Code - Sections 34, 302 and 392
above points at the time of framing of charge in the trial court. Criminal - Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Petition for quashing order taking cognizance of offence under Sections 392 and 302/34 IPC filed - … Rekha Kumari, J.1. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Code) for quashing the order dated 10.8.2004 passed by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Gujarat Vs. Miyana Abhram Mamad
Gujarat
Apr-23-2004
Criminal
Constitution of India - Articles 72 and 161; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 157, 313, 378 and 392; Evidence Act - Sections 103; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 135; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 300, 302, 324, 443, 453 and 457
2004CriLJ3471
provisions of Section 392 of the Code.' Criminal - acquittal - Sections 157, 313, 378 and 392 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 103 of Evidence Act, 1872 and Sections 300, 302, 324, 443, 453 and 457 of Indian … rendered in Criminal Appeal No.1216 of 1984 filed by the State of Gujarat under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('the Code' for short) against judgment dated June 2, 1984 rendered by the learned
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPushpendra Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh Gwalior
Jun-21-2011
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Section 374(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 392, 34, 397, 412; Indian Arms Act - Sections 25(1-b)(A), 27; Evidence Act - Section 114
(1) This appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 has been preferred by the appellant being aggrieved by the judgment dated 3 rd August 2006 passed … (1) This appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 has been preferred by the appellant being aggrieved … sentencing to suffer ten years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- for commission of offence under Section 392/34 read with Section 397 of I.P.C. and in default to suffer three years' additional rigorous imprisonment. No separate
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Akil Alias Javed. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Supreme Court of India
Dec-06-2012
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 392, 34, 354, 411, 376; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 313, 231, 230, 309
JJ.] Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 392, 34, 354, 411, 376; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 313, 231, 230, 309 -- Punishment for murder -- The learned counsel then contended that the … unlawful advantage. In this respect, it is relevant to refer to the provisions contained in Chapter XVIII of the Criminal Procedure Code whereunder Section 231 it has been specifically provided that on the date fixed for examination of witnesses as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Through Cbi, Anti Corruption Branch, Mumbai. Vs. ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-15-2012
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(2), 13(1)(e); Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Section 389(1), 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860 - Sections 392, 218, 466
JT2012(10)SC446
FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, JJ.] Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(2), 13(1)(e); Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Section 389(1), 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860 - Sections 392, 218, 466 -- The said application … notice.D) The respondent approached the High Court by filing an application under Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Cr.P.C.') requesting that during the pendency of his appeal against the said
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDilawar Singh Vs. State of Delhi
Supreme Court of India
Sep-05-2007
Criminal
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 8(2), 23,23B and 23(3); Sea Customs Act - Sections 19; Prevention of Corruption Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304, 392, 395, 397, 398 and 452; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 147, 154, 154(3), 155, 155(3), 156, 156(3), 169, 173, 190, 190(1), 200, 202, 202(1), 204, 210, 304, 342, 448 and 465
AIR2007SC3234; 2007(2)BLJR2828; 2007CriLJ4709; JT2007(10)SC585; 2007(10)SCALE556; 2007(2)LC1108(SC); 2007AIRSCW5899; (2007)3Crimes388(SC)
filed - Investigation envisaged in Section 202 is different from the investigation contemplated in Section 156 of the CrPC. - CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973.[C.A. No. 2/1974]. Sections 156 & 202: [Dr. Arijit Pasayat & D.K. Jain, … Affairs, West Bengal v. Abani Kumar Banerjee : AIR1950Cal437 What is taking cognizance has not been defined in the Criminal Procedure Code and I have no desire to attempt to define it. It seems to me clear however that before … the appellant and affirming his conviction for offences punishable under Sections 452, 392 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC')
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLalliram and anr. Vs. State of M.P.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-15-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342, 376, 392 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 378
[2008(4)JCR123(SC)]; JT2008(10)SC67; 2008(12)SCALE491; (2008)10SCC69; 2008AIRSCW6046; 2008(10)SCC69; 2008(4)Crimes99; 2008(6)Supreme472; 2008(5)LH(SC)3704
all the three accused persons. In appeal filed by the State under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the `Code') the order of acquittal was set aside and accused persons were found guilty … punishable under Sections 376, 392, 342 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). The trial Court directed acquittal of all … offence punishable under Sections 342 and 376 of IPC. But it upheld the acquittal for offence relatable to Section 392 and 506 (II) IPC. The appellants were sentenced to undergo seven years and six months custodial sentence and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Kerala Vs. Chellappan Sanal Kumar
Supreme Court of India
Mar-12-1981
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 392, 457, 369 and 201; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 (Cr.P.C) - Section 378
1981(Supp)SCC15
the reasons stated, the appeal fails and is dismissed. - [ A.D. Koshal and; Baharul Islam, JJ.] -- Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378 - Appeal against acquittal - Prosecution case not proved by reliable evidence and suffering from … was tried by the Sessions Judge, Trivandrum for offences under Sections 302, 392, 457, 369 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and was acquitted … - On facts held, acquittal of accused recorded by trial court and dismissal of application under Section 378, CrPC for leave to appeal by High Court justified -- The respondent was tried by the Sessions Judge, Trivandrum
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalwant Singh and anr. Vs. the State
Delhi
Dec-10-1985
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 392; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161
29(1986)DLT354
of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 161 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - conviction under Section 392 read with Section 34 challenged - appellants … Explanationn for his refusal. Radha Raman in reply to question no. 16 in his statement under section 313 Criminal Procedure Code stated as under : 'ANS.It is correct. I refused to Join identification, as the police took me from … an offence punishable under section 392 read with section 34 Indian Penal Code and sentenced each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years … Judge, Delhi. Four persons including the present appellants were charged in respect of commission of officers punishable under section 392 read with section 397 JPC. He convicted each of the appellants for an offence punishable under section 392
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskByyapagu Subba Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-18-1983
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 392
1983CriLJ1948
of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 392 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - whether appellant liable to be convicted under Sections 302 or 304 … are placed before this Bench in view of the Judgment delivered by Ramachandra Raju, J., under Section 392, Criminal Procedure Code. In view of the opinion expressed by the learned Judge the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 … to be likely to cause death and the case would accordingly fall under Section 304 Part II Penal Code.' In Shankar v. State of M.P. AIR 1979 SC 1523 : (1979 Cri LJ 1135), the Supreme Court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »