Advanced Search Results
Appu Ramani and ors. Vs. the State
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-23-1993
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 332 and 353; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468; Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967 - Sections 29(4)
1993(1)ALT370; 1993(1)ALT(Cri)373; 1993CriLJ1974
Order accordingly. Criminal - complaint - Sections 332 and 353 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 468 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 29 (4) of Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967 - whether the date of filing of … appreciation of the issue involved in this case, it is necessary to reproduce here Section 468 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which is in the following terms : '468. Bar to taking cognizance after lapse
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSajid Khan S/O Sayeed Khan Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Sep-02-1994
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 60, 61 and 106; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8(c) and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 353
1995(2)BomCR650
1872, Sections 8 (c) and 21 of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and Section 353 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - whether accused was in conscious possession of contraband goods subsequently recovered in concealed state on loft … the judgment was procrastinated, according to Mr. Ghare, the same is in breach of section 353 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. According to our opinion the trial Court could have either given the judgment immediately after
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArun R. Gupte Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-12-1994
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 353 and 482; Constitution of India - Article 226
1995(2)BomCR43; (1995)97BOMLR885
therefore, to be exercised with care and caution and only in rare cases.;(B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 353 - Adverse remarks in judgment - Court should use sober and moderate language.;Occasions no doubt arise when this … to submit report to the Magistrate. The petition allowed and rule made absolute in the above terms. (A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Inherent powers under - Exercise of - Unjustified remarks by subordinate Judge - … to be challenged either by way of appeal or revision under the Code of Criminal Procedure before appropriate forum. But High Court has ample power
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sudesh Kumar and ors. Vs. the State of Delhi
Delhi
May-08-2002
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397, 397(2), 482 and 483; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 149, 186, 332, 342, 353 and 506; Special Courts Act, 1979 - Sections 11(1)
2002VAD(Delhi)177; 98(2002)DLT516
S.K. Agarwal, J.1. This petition under Sections 482/483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') is directedagainst the order dated 18th February, 2002 passed by Sh. … them in Amar Nath's case (supra) and held that the term 'interlocutory order' used in Section 397(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code has to be given a liberal meaning in favor of the accused in order to ensure complete fairness
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarayanasa Bhimasa Pawar Vs. Jawaharlal Shanomiksa Arisiddi
Karnataka
Nov-09-1993
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 353
1994(2)ALT(Cri)67; 1995(1)ALT(Cri)601; ILR1994KAR549; 1994(1)KarLJ351
the light of the observations made above. The Revision Petitions are allowed only to the extent indicated above. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 - Section 353 - Passing common Judgment, using evidence adduced in one case for purpose of arriving … of the observations made above. The Revision Petitions are allowed only to the extent indicated above. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 - Section 353 - Passing common Judgment, using evidence adduced in one case for purpose of arriving
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGurcharan Singh Arora and anr. Vs. the State
Delhi
Jan-04-2002
Motor VehiclesCriminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 173, 195 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 186, 332, 353 and 506; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 39, 185 and 192
2002IIIAD(Delhi)445; 2002CriLJ2130; 96(2002)DLT181; 2002(62)DRJ249
Trial court record be sent back forthwith. Any observations made herein shall not affect merits of the case. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482--Quashing of FIR--Offence under Sections 186/332/353/506 & 34, IPC and Section 39/192 of Motor Vehicles … allegation made orally or in writing to a magistrate, with a view to his taking action under this Code, that some person, whether known or unknown, has committed an offence, but does not include a police report.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhootati Konda Murugadu Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-20-1995
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 99, 332, 352 and 353; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 41, 41(1), 54, 55, 55(1), 56, 56(1) and 104
1996(2)ALD905; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)660; 1996(2)ALT(Cri)85; 1996CriLJ3310
Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 41, 41 (1), 54, 55, 55 (1), 56, 56 (1) and 104 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - petitioner alleged his arrest by Head Constable (HC) was illegal - contended that HC did not … written order from PW 4 as required under S. 55 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short, 'the Code') was illegal and therefore the … him by SHO - arrest of petitioner by HC not illegal - held, petitioner liable for offence under Section 353 - conviction by Lower Courts justified. - - Sessions Judge, Tirupati, proved to be unsuccessful. In this provision
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNamasivayam Vs. State
Chennai
Jun-16-1981
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 353 and 409; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156(3), 169, 170, 173, 173(2)(1) and 173(3)
1982CriLJ707
Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 156 (3), 169, 170, 173, 173 (2) (1) and 173 (3) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - whether Sub Divisional Magistrate can take cognizance of offence on reinvestigation report of police having passed … assault and used criminal force, against the Bank officials from discharging their duties, warranting the petitioner's conviction under Section 353 I.P.C. This complaint sent by one of the accused, who is no other than the Co-operative official, was … counsel. 7. Section 5 Crl.P.C. provides that an offence under the Penal Code shall be investigated, tried or inquired in accordance with the Provisions contained
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohan Parkash Dubey and ors. Vs. State
Delhi
May-22-2001
Criminal
Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 353
2001VAD(Delhi)408; 92(2001)DLT206; 2001(59)DRJ190
same is dismissed. Trial court record be sent back. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 197--Prosecution of Public Servants--Sanction of government--Section does not provide protection … it falls within the scope and range of his official duties, the protection contemplated by Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code will be attracted'.7. The question whether the offence was committed in the course of official duties or under … under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the order dated 13th July, 2000 … that no prior sanction was required under section 197 Cr. C.P. and that prima facie a case under section 353/34 IPC was made out against the petitioners.3. I have learned counsel for the parties and have been taken
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Punjab Vs. Balbir Singh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-26-2004
CriminalNarcotics
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 41, 42, 43 and 50; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 353(6)
AIR2005SC627; 2005CriLJ97; 2004(96)ECC569; RLW2005(1)SC128; 2004(9)SCALE23
Accused Kuldip Singh was absent and, therefore, the judgment was pronounced under Section 353(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the 'Code'). The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridkot was requested for his arrest and execution of … the sentence. Accused Kuldip Singh was absent and, therefore, the judgment was pronounced under Section 353(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the 'Code'). The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridkot was requested for his arrest
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »