Advanced Search Results
Babulal Bhagwan Khandare and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court of India
Dec-02-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 35, 38, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 to 106, 300, 302 and 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 105
2004(10)SCALE188; (2005)10SCC404
Code, 1860 - Sections 34, 35, 38, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 to 106, 300, 302, 307 - Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973 - Section 313 - Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 105 - Right of private defence - Entitlement to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUshman and Another Vs. the State
Chennai
Mar-07-1997
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 425 and 436; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 227 and 228; Evidence Act - Sections 105
1997CriLJ2457
of the case as expeditiously as possible. 22. Revision partly allowed. Criminal - discharge - Section 227 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Sections 34 and 436 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - whether dismissal of petition filed for … in which it is held as follows :- 'That in exercising his jurisdiction under section 227 of the Code the Judge which under the present Code is a senior and experience Judge cannot act merely as a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCapt. Abdul Sattar Ahmed Pagarkar Vs. R.H. Mendsonsa, Commissioner of ...
Mumbai
Feb-20-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 406 and 467; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145 and 482
2003(2)ALD(Cri)62; 2003BomCR(Cri)983; 2003CriLJ3790
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 406 and 467; Constitution of India - Article 226; Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 145 and 482 - Petitioner challenged legality and continuance of investigation in respect of complaint filed … respect of complaint filed by Mr. S.K. Wadhwani which alleges commission of offences punishable under the provisions of Section 406, 467 of IPC. Shri Wadhwani alleged that by taking his signatures on blank documents the petitioner committed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Deepak Son of Narayanappa Tewere and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Apr-26-1994
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201, 301, 302, 306 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 174, 313 and 374(2)
1995(4)BomCR386; 1995CriLJ2219
201, 302, 306 and 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 174, 313 and 374 (2) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - appeal against conviction under Sections 302, 201 and 498A read with Section 34 - appellants contended … 87). On the said report, crime under Sections 498A, 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code was registered against Deepak (accused No. 1) and Smt. Vatsalabai (accused No. 4). On post-mortem of body of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDaljit Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab Through Secretary Home Affai ...
Supreme Court of India
Jul-27-2006
Criminal
Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4 and 12; General Clauses Act - Sections 8(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 307, 323 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 360, 360(10) and 361
JT2006(7)SC98; 2006(7)SCALE421; (2006)6SCC159
the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (in short the 'Probation Act') and Section 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (in short the 'Code').Per contra learned Counsel for the respondent-State submitted that looking at the gravity of … punishable under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). They were also convicted in terms of … of Rs. 5,000/- each with default stipulation for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). They were also convicted in terms of Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaveen Chandra Vs. State of Uttranchal
Supreme Court of India
Nov-27-2006
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 96 to 98, 99, 100 to 106; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 96, 100, 101, 102, 105, 300, 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 366
AIR2007SC363; 2007CriLJ874; [2007(2)JCR247(SC)]; RLW2007(3)SC2143; 2006(12)SCALE456; 2006(3)ShimLC405; (2007)1Crimes207(SC); 2006AIRSCW6230;
96, 100, 101, 102, 105, 300, 302 and 304 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 366 of Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973 - Appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 - Accused persons pleaded
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJohar and ors. Vs. Mangal Prasad and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-30-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 148, 149, 193, 196, 302 and 323; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 378, 378(4), 397, 401, 401(3), 417, 421, 421(3), 423, 423(4), 439, 439(1) and 439(4); Constitution of India - Article 142
AIR2008SC1165; 2008(2)ALD(Cri)105; 2008CriLJ1627; JT2008(2)SC112; 2008(2)SCALE122; (2008)3SCC423; 2008AIRSCW1106; 2008(1)Crimes375; (2008)2SCC(Cri)89; 2008(2)LH(SC)806
Acquittal - High Court - Revisional jurisdiction - Sections 397, 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC, 1973) - Sections 34, 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, 1860) - Appellants were convicted for commission … the impugned judgment which is in the teeth of Sub-section (3) of Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 6. Ms Vibha Datta Makhija, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State, on the other
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDesh Deepak Sharma and ors. Vs. State of Delhi and ors.
Delhi
Jan-18-2008
BankingCriminal
Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 205(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 406 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397(1), 397(2) and 482; Constitution of India - Article 134
147(2008)DLT293
Sharma and Anr. is pending within ten days from today. Banking -criminal- Interlocutory Order - Section 397(2) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Sections 34 and 420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 … Rajendra Kumar Sitaram Pande v. Uttam : 1999CriLJ1620 supports the proposition that a revision petition under Section 397(2) CrPC would not be maintainable only if the order sought to be revised was a purely interlocutory one. Since
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBankat and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court of India
Nov-25-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 325 and 326; Bombay Probation of Offenders Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 320, 320(1), 320(2) and 320(9); Constitution of India - Article 142
AIR2005SC368; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)800; 2005CriLJ646; JT2004(10)SC471; 2005(2)MhLj707; 2004(9)SCALE679; (2005)1SCC343
Criminal - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 34, 325, 326 - Bombay Probation of Offenders Act - Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.PC), 1973 - Sections 320, 320(1), 320(2), 320(9) - Constitution of India - Article 142 - Conviction of … Sections 325 and 326 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC').3. For offence relatable to Section 326 read … by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Osmanabad for offences punishable under Sections 325 and 326 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC').3. For offence relatable to Section 326 read with
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubhash Ramchandra Durge Vs. Deepak Annasaheb Gat and anr.
Mumbai
Jul-04-2000
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 211; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195(1) and 250
2001(5)BomCR235; 2000CriLJ4774
No. 179 of 1994 is hereby quashed. Rule made absolute. Interim order dated 2-12-1994 is hereby vacated.Petition allowed. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 195(1)(b)(i) - Cognizance of offence - Complaint under Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code, … Gat, Ramesh Annasaheb Gat and Anwar Ainuddin Herwade @ Shaikh for offences punishable under section 407 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The contention of the complainant Subhash Durge, accused herein, as narrated in the … No. 2 Ramesh Annasaheb Gat, under section 211 of the Indian Penal Code and issued process against the petitioner.2. Few facts, which are required to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »