Advanced Search Results

M/S. Deepak Corporation Vs. Pushpa Prahlad Nanderjog

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 - Sections 31, 32-A, 33, 34, 36, 37, 39 and 41; Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 33, 35 and 58; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : AIR1994Bom337; 1995(1)BomCR452; 1995(1)MhLj489

35 and 58 of Stamp Act, 1899, Order 21 Rule 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - applicant filed for modification of undertaking given by petitioner - same impounded and Registrar directed to … proceeding under Chapter IX of Part D of Chapter X of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, makes any order admitting any instrumental evidence as … relevant provisions of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 (the Act). Chapter IV deals with 'Instruments not duly stamped'. Section 33 provides for examination and impounding of such instruments. This section as it stood at the material time reads:'S.

Amar Nath Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33 and 69; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 397, 452, 454, 468, 517 and 648; ;Constitution of India - Article 48A; ;Constitution of India (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : 1990CriLJ506

ORDERBhawani Singh, J.1. This Revision Petition, under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code'), arises out … the subject-matter of the theft and he is not, therefore, entitled to recover the property under Section 517, Criminal Procedure Code.'6. In the instant case, even though the non-applicant has been acquitted, due to incomplete evidence, it would not … way of this petition.2. The facts, in brief, are that the petitioner was prosecuted for an offence under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). He was accused of felling 15

Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma and Additional Director General of Po ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32, 142 and 226; All India Services Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 2A and 3; Indian Police Service (Cadre) Rules, 1954 - Rules 8(1) and 9; Indian Police Service (Fixation of Cadre Strength) Regulations, 1955; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 33, 154, 156 and 156(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 255, 259, 260, 263A, 263B, 471, 472 and 474; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 2(11), 4, 6(1), 21, 22 and 23(1); Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999; Mental Health Act, 1987; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 7(2)

Reported in : 2004(3)MhLj760

472 and 474 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 2, 33, 154, 156 and 156 (1) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - applicant challenging Order directing retired Director General of Police (DGP) to exercise all powers exercisable by … the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, the High Court cannot overstep limits prescribed by statute. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 defines the expression 'investigation' in Section 2(h) and the expression officer-in-charge of a police

Devpuri Hirapuri Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 161; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20(2) and 32(A); Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3(1) and 59; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 27, 33, 432, 433, 434 and 462

Reported in : (1999)3GLR880

the appeal or otherwise as also the powers of the Government under Section 432, 433 and 434 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and that Section 32A would have an overriding effect with regard to the powers of suspension, commutation and … Procedure, 1973 or any other law for the time being in force but subject to the provisions of section 33 no sentence awarded under this Act (other than section 27) shall be suspended or remitted or commuted.'It might … under;'It is thus, abundantly clear that the concept of imprisonment under the Code is a well defined and well understood concept and it only means

Rajan Bagaria Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : FERACriminal

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 18(2), 56, 33(2), 40, 68, 68(1) and 68(2); Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections 49(3) and 49(4); Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2008(101)DRJ385

quashed.18. The petition is allowed with no orders as to costs. The pending application also stands disposed of. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973Section 482 - Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973--Sections 56 & 33(2)--Petitioner was not a person in charge of … proved only at the trial. It is submitted that scope of interference by this Court under Section 482 CrPC is extremely limited and has to be sparingly used. A reference is made to the judgment of Medchi

Rotash Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 33, 34, 37 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161

Reported in : 2007CriLJ758; 2006(13)SCALE186; 2007AIRSCW44; (2007)2SCC(Cri)382; (2007)1Crimes236(SC); 2007(2)KCCRSN57; 2007(2)AIRKarR22(SC)

Common intention - Sections 33, 34, 37 and 302 of Indian Penal Code,1860 - - Section 161 of Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973 -- Appeal against conviction - Whether Appellant can be found guilty for sharing common intention along with accused

S.A. Jamal Shah Vs. Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intel ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, 389, 432, 433 and 439; Narcotic drugs psycho. Sub. Act - Sections 8, 21, 27, 32A, 33, 36, 36A, 36B and 37

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2771

is accordingly dismissed. 16. Petition dismissed. Criminal - bail - Sections 4, 389, 432, 433 and 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Sections 8, 21, 27, 32A, 33, 36, 36A, 36B and 37 of Narcotic Drugs Psychotropic Substance … such offenders. The said section itself starts with a non obstante clause, namely, 'Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)'. 6. The power of the Court is traceable to the salient

Maktool Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 27, 32A and 36B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 33, 389 and 432 to 435; Constitution of India - Articles 72 and 161

Reported in : AIR1999SC1131; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)735; 1999CriLJ1825; 1999(2)Crimes338(SC); (2001)1GLR298; JT1999(2)SC176; 1999(II)OLR(SC)1; RLW2000(1)SC69; 1999(2)SCALE26; (1999)3SCC321; [199

of any appeal or otherwise. Similarly, the power of the Government under Sections 432, 433 and 434 of the Criminal Procedure Code have also been taken away. Section 32A would have an overriding effect with regard to the powers of … No suspension, remission or commutation in any sentence awarded under this Act - Notwithstanding anything contained in the CrPC, 1973 or any other law for the time being in force but subject to the provisions of Section 33,

Dattatraya S/O Ramrao Thorat Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2002(4)ALLMR807; (2002)104BOMLR561

summary way and provisions of section 262 except Sub-section (2) to 265, both inclusive, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, shall as far as possible may be applied to such trial. Section 13 provides for penalty for issuing … (supra) as well as the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.33. Sub-section (4) of Section 10 of the Act fell for our consideration … of civil nature. Such a right amounts to civil right within the meaning of Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and thus only a Civil Court has jurisdiction to decide such a right of

Hanamappa M. Madar Vs. State by Police Sub-inspector

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 299, 299(1) and 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 2007(4)KarLJ377

that the appellant was not suspecting the fidelity of his wife. The statements recorded under Section 299 of the Criminal Procedure Code are not admissible in evidence as there is no opportunity to the appellant to cross-examine them. Further, the … accused.24. Admissibility of Evidence under Section 299 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.--As noticed above after completion of the investigation charge-sheet was filed before the … 41 : 2000 SSC (Cri.) 740, has held that if the precondition of Section 299 of Cr.P.C. and Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 are established by the prosecution, then the statement of witnesses recorded under … convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine