Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the criminal procedure code crpc 1973 section 20 · Page 1 of about 16,586 results (0.247 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 28 1998

Sadanandan Bhadran Vs. Madhavan Sunil Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-28-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 142; Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973;

Reported in : 1998VIAD(SC)357; AIR1998SC3043; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)529; 1998(4)ALLMR(SC)645; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)289; 1999(1)BLJR51; [1998]94CompCas812(SC); (1998)4CompLJ228(SC); 1998CriLJ4066; (1998)6SCC514

to Section 138. (emphasis supplied)8. In a generic and wide sense (as in Section 20 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908) 'cause of action' means every fact which it is necessary to establish to support a right or … rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Kerala High Court in Criminal Misc. Case No. 1373 of 1991. Facts relevant for disposal of this … within the meaning of Section 142(b) of the Act. Section 142 reads as under:'Notwithstanding anything contained in the CrPC, 1973(a) no court shall take congnizance of any offence punishable Under Section 138 except upon a complaint, in writing,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 2004

Poonam Chand JaIn and anr. Vs. Fazru

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-15-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 20, 200, 203, 204, 204(1), 245, 300, 397(2) and 482

Reported in : AIR2005SC938; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)1014; 2005CriLJ100; JT2004(9)SC208; 2005(I)OLR(SC)1; (2005)139PLR40; RLW2005(1)SC104; 2004(8)SCALE833; 2004 (13) SCC 269

was, observed.'Therefore, if has not misdirected himself as to the scope of the enquiry made under Section 20, Criminal Procedure Code, and has judicially applied his mind to the material before him and then proceeds to make his order … in this appeal as to the effect of dismissal of a complaint filed under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the 'Code') and whether second complaint can be filed.2. Brief reference to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 1995

Suresh H. Rajput Etc. Vs. Bhartiben Pravinbhai Soni and Others Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-28-1995

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7, 12, 14A, 16 and 20; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : 1996IAD(SC)74; AIR1996SC2883; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)828; 1996CriLJ1621; JT1995(9)SC210; 1995(7)SCALE217; (1996)7SCC199; [1995]Supp5SCR747

1991CriLJ1438 , one of us, (K. Ramaswamy, J.) considered the effect of the sanction under Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code at page 268 thus :It is equally well settled that before granting sanction the authority or the appropriate … on merits in favour of the prosecution. On appeal filed by the appellant under Section 378(4) of the CrPC, 1973, the High Court by order dated October 28, 1991 refused leave and confirmed the acquittal. Thus these appeals … indicated that the milk was adulterated. Consequently, the local Health authority on June 7, 1986 granted sanction under Section 20(1) of the Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (for short, 'the Act') for laying the complaint against the respondent. In

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 30 2004

The State of Maharashtra (at the Instance of Shri S.B. Jadhav, Food In ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-30-2004

Subject : CriminalConsumer

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 11, 13(2), 14A, 16, 17, 20 and 20(1); Prevention of Corruption Act; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 100, 100(3), 100(7), 196A and 197; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1958 - Rule 3; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rules 14, 16 and 16(6)

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2780

Section 20 of the Act was qualitatively same as expression 'Sanction' as would appear in Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. On that basis, it was contended that the rigours that would apply for a valid Sanction, would … the Act was qualitatively same as expression 'Sanction' as would appear in Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. On that basis, it was contended that the rigours that would apply for a valid Sanction, would

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2003

Dr. Praveen Bhai Thogadia Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-13-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 20, 144, 144(1), 144(5), 144(6) and 482; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : 2003CriLJ1769; ILR2003KAR3175; 2003(3)KarLJ435

by Sub-section (2) of Section 20 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Central Act 2 of 1974), and in suppression of Government Notification Nos. … and in the extent of its application. There is no general proposition that an order under Section 144, Criminal Procedure Code cannot be passed without taking evidence: see Mst. Jagrupa Kumari v. Chotay Narain Singh, 1936 Cri. L.J. 95 … any order or judgment of any Court or the functionaries under the Code of Criminal Procedure could be made amenable to the scrutiny under Section … jurisdiction to pass the impugned order. In this regard it is necessary to refer to the provisions of Section 20 of the Cr. P.C. The relevant provisions of Sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 20 of the Cr.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 1990

State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Mohammed Salim Khan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-22-1990

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Sections 20, 21 and 107

Reported in : (1991)93BOMLR25; 1991(1)Crimes120(SC); 1991(I)OLR(SC)1; 1990(2)SCALE1099; (1991)1SCC550; [1990]Supp3SCR340; 1991(1)LC337(SC)

aside the judgment of the High Court. Criminal - additional power - Section 20, 21 and 107 of Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC ), 1973 - Executive Magistrate given power by Government to deal with offences under Section 107 - power

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 1999

Selvaraj, S/O Gnanadesihan Vs. P. Viswanathan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-22-1999

Subject : Banking Food Adulteration

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 -- Sections 138 and 142; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 29, 167(2), and 325(1); Banking Public Financial Institution and Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amended) Act, 1988 (Act 66 of 1988) -- Sections 139, 140, 141 and 142; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 -- Sections 25, 26, 190, 200, 207, 262 to 265, 347, 372 to 379 and 468(1); Supreme Court Advocates (Practice in High Courts) Act, 1951 -- Sections 2; Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 -- Sections 4(2) and 8(1), 9(4), 14(3) and 15; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 -- Sections 20, 27, 36-A, 37 and 51; Criminal Justice Act, 1948 -- Sections 23; Special Court Act, 1982 -- Sections 11(1); Constitution of India, Articles 132, 133, 134 and 136; Preventio

Reported in : 1999(2)ALD(Cri)438; 1999CriLJ4766; 1999(2)CTC652

of fine than the limit spelt out from the relevant provision regarding the powers of such Magistrate under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 in respect of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.'2. The following factual … relevant provision regarding the powers of such Magistrate under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 in respect of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable … Act. While there was a provision for modified application of Section 167 as provided by sub-section (4) of Section 20 by which the period specified under Section 167 was increased, there was no such provision in the N.D.P.S

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 1995

Balu S/O Rakhmaji Khamkar and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-28-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167, 167(2), 173(2) and 173(5); Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 21, 22, 25 and 27

Reported in : 1995(4)BomCR335

accepting the charge sheet. Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by its sub-section (2) gives the requirement of a valid charge sheet. … photographs of the seized articles are still to be drawn. It is not only surprising but agonizing. When the Criminal Procedure Code has given a specific absolute right to the accused detained, that he shall be released on bail, if … and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 prays for bail by virtue of the provisions of section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.3. It is the case of the prosecution that applicant was found in possession of Ganja … by Rahuri Police Station for allegedly having committed offence punishable under sections 20 21, 22, 25 and 27 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 1993

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Chandrakant Annappa Shyanbhag and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-06-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 244, 245, 246 and 247; Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 - Sections 3; Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 - Sections 20(1), 20(2) and 20(3); Constitution of India - Article 21(5)

Reported in : 1993(2)BomCR211

(2) and 20 (3) of Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 and Sections 244, 245, 246 and 247 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - question whether an act complained of is one purported to be done in execution of his … complaint and is triable as a warrant case. Chapter XIX of the Code of Criminal Procedure deals with trial of warrant cases. Sections 238 to … Magistrate found that the prosecution lodged against them was not maintainable on the ground that no notice under section 20(3) of the Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to, as the said Act of 1957) was served

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2004

State of Karnataka and anr. Vs. Dr. Praveen Bhai Thogadia

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 20, 20(1), 20(2), 21, 29, 144, 144(1), 144(3) and 482; Constitution of India; Defence of India Act, 1962 - Sections 40

Reported in : AIR2004SC2081; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)46; 2004(2)BLJR912; 2004CriLJ1825; (2004)3GLR2242; JT2004(4)SC129; 2004(4)KarLJ484; 2004(2)KLT342(SC); 2004(4)SCALE115; (2004)4SCC684

respondent challenged the order in a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the 'Code') before the High Court … and, in the extent of its application. There is no general proposition that an order under Section 144, Criminal Procedure Code cannot be passed without taking evidence: see Mst. Jagrupa Kumari v. Chobey Narain Singh 37 Cl.L.J. 95 which … ADM who passed the order was not covered by the categories of officials empowered to pass the order. Section 20 of the Code deals with 'Executive Magistrates'. Sections 20, 21 and 144 of the Code, altogether deal with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial