Advanced Search Results

M/s Kozyflex Mattresses Private Limited Vs. Sbi General Insurance Comp ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

VERSUS SBI GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND ANR. …..RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Mehta, J.1. This appeal under Section 67 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (hereinafter being referred to as ‘Act of 2019’) has been preferred by the appellant herein for assailing final … COMPANY LIMITED AND ANR. …..RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Mehta, J.1. This appeal under Section 67 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (hereinafter being referred to as ‘Act of 2019’) has been preferred by the appellant herein for assailing final

Forum For Peoples Collective Efforts (fpce) Vs. The State Of West Beng ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

RERA. The effect of Section 88 is to ensure that remedies which are available under consumer legislation, including Consumer Protection Act, 2019, are not ousted as a consequence of the operation of the RERA. Of course, it is also material … and other members and in such case any person who had vacated his office under clause (a) of sub-section (2) shall not be deemed to be disqualified for re-appointment. (4) The appropriate Government shall cause a copy of

Ireo Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Abhishek Khanna

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

one-sided and unfair was illegal and without jurisdiction, under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. It was only under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which came into effect from 20.07.2020, that the State Consumer Forum and the National Commission were conferred with … oppressive and wholly one-sided, and would constitute an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. 3019.3 Section 2(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 defines a ‗complaint‘ as : ―2.(1)(c) ―complaint‖ means any allegation in writing

Bar Of Indian Lawyers Through Its President Jasbir Sigh Malik Vs. D.k. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the lawyer availed of by the client would be covered under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (now Consumer Protection Act, 2019). 12. It is well recognized that the profession of law is a noble profession having an element of … a person in pursuance of a contract or otherwise in relation to any service.” Section 2(11) of CP Act, 2019:- Section 2(11) - "Deficiency " means any fault, imperfection, shortcoming or inadequacy in the quality, nature and manner of

Alpha G184 Owners Association Vs. M/s Magnum International Trading Com ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

orders. DISCUSSION15 The Consumer Protection Act, 1986; 68 of 1986 (hereinafter referred to as “the 1986 Act”) and the Consumer Protection Act, 2019; 35 of 2019 (hereinafter referred to as “the 2019 Act”) have got a laudable objective. The 2019 Act … do violence to the language of the provisions and is not contrary to attempted objective of the enactment.16. Section 2(b) of the 1986 Act, under which the present complaints were filed, defines the word “complainant”. It is certainly

Dr.Vijil, vs Ambujakshi .T.P.,

Court : Kerala

Commissions, as sans jurisdiction and hence illegal. The petitioners also pray to declare that the Consumer Fora under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 do not have jurisdiction to take cognizance of complaints in respect of medical negligence and deficiency in medical … service, as medical profession and practice do not come within the purview of the term ‘service’ defined under Section 2(42) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.:4:2. The petitioners state that C.C. No.202/2020 wasfiled in the District Consumer

M. Lakshman Bhakta Vs. Vodafone Idea Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

agreement governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 will 10 “Act of 2019” 11 Section 2(42) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is as follows: - "service" means service of any description which is made available to potential users and

M/s Texco Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Tata Aig Generla Insurance Company L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

not based on an adequate or proper test thereof:30.The definition clause under sub-section (46) of Section 2 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as “the 2019 Act”) gives a very broad meaning of unfair contract. As in the

Godrej Projects Development Limited versus Anil Karlekar & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]2S.C.R.343

money; Unfair and unreasonable contract; Unfair trade practice; Section 74 of the Contract Act, 1872; Section 2(46) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019; Section 2(1)(r) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Case Arising From CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 3334 of 2023

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corp. Ltd. versus Awaz & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.1482

before the National Commission and an alternate remedy has been provided by the legislature. The present regime under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, provides a mechanism for redressal of grievances of consumers. By virtue of section 10 of the Consumer Protection … indulged in any unfair trade practice nor have done anything which would bring them within the mischief of Section 2(r)(l)(i) to 2(r)(l)(x). 8. Further, there are also no specific allegations raised by the Complainants or any materials on