Advanced Search Results

Nafis Qazi & Anr. Vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

have filed counter affidavits.4. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondent no.2, our attention is drawn to the Coinage Act, 2011 which is an enactment inter alia intended to consolidate the laws relating to coinage and minting as well … circulation of such coins, the respondent no.1 is promoting one W.P.(C)No.1777/2014 Page 1 of 5 particular religion.2. Premised on the above averment, by way of … well as protection of coinage.5. So far as the expression ‘coin’ is concerned, the same is defined in Section 2(a) thus : “2(a) "coin" means any coin which is made of any metal or any other material

Vivek Narayan Sharma Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

xxxx (d) “rupee coin” means (***) rupees which are legal tender in India under the provisions of the Coinage Act, 2011 (11 of 2011)” 13 7.4 Chapter II of the Act deals with Incorporation, Capital, Management and Business. Section … PROVISIONS OF SECTION3AND SECTION41) THEREOF TO ACCEPT THE DEMONETIZED NOTES BEYOND THE PERIOD SPECIFIED IN NOTIFICATIONS ISSUED UNDER SUB-SECTION (1) OF SECTION4OF THE2017ACT?. 242 289. It is sought to be urged by Shri Divan that the RBI has

Sunflame Enterprises P. Ltd. vs Sumit Kishan Sharma & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Mark, which is confusingly and deceptively similar, and almost identical, to the Petitioner’s Mark. Such ingenious adoption and coinage cannot be a mere coincidence. The adoption of the Impugned Mark further shows slavish imitation of the Petitioner’s … marks as has been held in Hindustan Unilever limited v. Ashique Chemicals, 2011 SCC OnLine Bom 1061. 4.5 The Petitioner has registrations over the Petitioner’s … JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAJUDGMENTTEJAS KARIA, J1. The present Rectification Petition has been filed under Section 57 ofthe Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“Act”) seeking rectification of the Register of Trade Marks by cancellation / removal of the Trade Mark, … Rectification Petition has been filed under Section 57 ofthe Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“Act”) seeking rectification of the Register of Trade Marks by cancellation /

…………. Plaintiffs Vs. Kepler Healthcare Private

Court : Kolkata

Subject : MRTP

could be adopted by the company or not, by a backdated letter, to create evidence of bona fide coinage of the marks. The intention of the plaintiff is to kill the business of the defendants, it is … the ability of his secondary mark to distinguish.” Fifteenth Edition of Year 2011 Hence, one manufacturer or source may have two marks or brands. Therefore … had settled several important points in this branch of the law. In the case of a passing off action, where both the marks are unregistered, prior user of the mark would entitle its owner or licensee to … Brandon and Co.; AIR1965Bombay 35 it was held that the discretion under Section 12 (3) of the Act can only be exercised where two or … Mr.Heera Jain, Mr.Kaninika Ghosh, Advocates Heard on : 17.01.2014 Judgment on : 31st January, 2014 I.P.MUKERJI, J.

Rhizome Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India, Represented by its ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property

petitioner is a dishonest adoption with an intention to pass of its goods, there is no explanation for the coinage of IMPERIAL GOLD by the petitioner, which is evident from the imitation of the trade dress, label and … the Register of Trademarks, and to pass such further.) T.S. Sivagnanam, J. 1. Challenge in this Writ Petition is to an order passed by the … Appellate Board (IPAB), dated 24.12.2010, in ORA/248/08/TM/CH, an application filed by the fourth respondent under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 ( the Act ?) for removal of the petitioner's trade mark 'Rhizome's IMPERIAL GOLD' registered under No.1161682 … the order passed by the IPAB holding that the grounds embodied under Sections 9 and 11 of the Act, are available to the persons only

International Foodstuffs Co. LLC. Vs. Parle Products Pvt. Ltd. and Ano ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

tea, rice, artificial coffee, bread, pastry and so on. The Charminar principle, if I might be permitted a coinage of my own, from Vazir Sultan must apply here. 19.Mr. Tulzapurkar then submits that as regards passing off, … mark and the label mark are both registered in Class 30. In 2011 the Defendants applied for registration for the mark LONDONDERRY . This is … the Plaintiff for its ice cream that the Plaintiff is entitled to an injunction on both causes of action, i.e., trademark infringement and passing off. 2. I disagree. My reasons follow. 3. To begin with, there is … at least as regards other goods in view of the provisions of Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. 14.Every registrant, he submits, should … Oral Judgment: 1.This order will dispose of the Plaintiff s application

Smt a.N.Leelanagaraja vs Smt Nagarathnamma

Court : Karnataka

binding on the parties to the lis in that proceeding, only to represent the estate of the deceased;(3) The coinage of the word summary enquiry have emanated from the fact that (a) there is no pleadings, issue concerning … the share of Aswathamma would revert to all the heirs of Nagappa under the provisions of Hindu Succession Act. In other words, there shall be partition in respect of the AIR 2008 SC 2866 AIR 2010 SC … Venugopal who was the LR of Smt. A.V. Nagavenamma on 13.1.2023 under Section 151 of CPC seeking orders as the appellants have violated the stay

Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha vs Tech Square Engineering Pvt Ltd &am ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

doubt as to the bona fides of such adoption.85. The inconsistencies in the Respondent’s stand, at one stageclaiming coinage of the mark, and at another attributing its origin to a dictionary or astronomical reference, further detract from … in Mumbai (Model 2004); n. Times of India article dated November 22, 2011 (Page No. 900) re Mr. Gautam Adani’s vehicle under the Appellant’s mark … which predates the Respondent’s registration. Consequently, the Appellant initiated rectification proceedings under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 19993, seeking the removal of the impugned mark from the Register.5. The learned Single Judge, by the impugned … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment reserved on: 18.02.2026Judgment pronounced on: 04.05.2026+ LPA 176/2023 & CM APPL. 11804/2023 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI

Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha vs Tech Square Engineering Pvt Ltd &am ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

doubt as to the bona fides of such adoption.85. The inconsistencies in the Respondent’s stand, at one stageclaiming coinage of the mark, and at another attributing its origin to a dictionary or astronomical reference, further detract from … in Mumbai (Model 2004); n. Times of India article dated November 22, 2011 (Page No. 900) re Mr. Gautam Adani’s vehicle under the Appellant’s mark … which predates the Respondent’s registration. Consequently, the Appellant initiated rectification proceedings under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 19993, seeking the removal of the impugned mark from the Register.5. The learned Single Judge, by the impugned … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment reserved on: 18.02.2026Judgment pronounced on: 04.05.2026+ LPA 176/2023 & CM APPL. 11804/2023 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI

Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha vs Tech Square Engineering Pvt Ltd &am ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

doubt as to the bona fides of such adoption.85. The inconsistencies in the Respondent’s stand, at one stageclaiming coinage of the mark, and at another attributing its origin to a dictionary or astronomical reference, further detract from … in Mumbai (Model 2004); n. Times of India article dated November 22, 2011 (Page No. 900) re Mr. Gautam Adani’s vehicle under the Appellant’s mark … which predates the Respondent’s registration. Consequently, the Appellant initiated rectification proceedings under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 19993, seeking the removal of the impugned mark from the Register.5. The learned Single Judge, by the impugned … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment reserved on: 18.02.2026Judgment pronounced on: 04.05.2026+ LPA 176/2023 & CM APPL. 11804/2023 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI