Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the code on wages section 6 · Page 1 of about 6,277 results (0.076 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 12 1988

Dr Baliram Waman Hiray Vs. Justice B. LentIn and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-12-1988

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 5(4), 5(5) and 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3) and 346; Constitution of India - Article 141; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193 and 228; Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 23; Payment of Wages Act - Sections 18; Indian Railways Act - Sections 40

Reported in : AIR1988SC2267; (1988)90BOMLR434; 1988(3)Crimes655(SC); [1989]176ITR1(SC); JT1988(4)SC265; 1988(2)SCALE688; (1988)4SCC419; [1988]Supp2SCR942; [1989]72STC384(SC)

judicial proceeding within the meaning of Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860). Section 6 provides:6.Statements made by persons to the Commission - No statement made by a person in the course of … Railways Act, 1890, Section 23 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 and Section 18 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936. These provisions which are almost similar provide that the Tribunal under the Indian Railways Act, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 1947

The Manager, the Spring Mills, Ltd. Vs. G.D. Ambekar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-14-1947

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1949)51BOMLR148

revise under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code a decision of the 'Authority' under the Payment of Wages Act. The applicant is a manager of the Spring Mills, Limited, and as such responsible for the payment … shall be final.'6. Section 18 lays down thatevery Authority shall have the powers of a civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for the purpose of taking evidence and of enforcing the attendance of witnesses and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 1909

Emperor Vs. Ganesh Damodar Savarkar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-08-1909

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1910)12BOMLR105

excite disaffection goes without saying.6. The only question is whether these poems also fall within Section 121 of the Code and amount to an abetment of the waging of war against the King Emperor and his rule in … the venom is too transparent to be mistaken for anything else than a call to the people to wage war against the British Government. It is idle for counsel to quibble about the meaning of certain words

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 06 1944

Jivanlal Kandas Vs. Ramtuji Bhaiji

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-06-1944

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1944)46BOMLR795

sought to be attached were part of their wages and that under Section 60 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, no part of their wages could be attached. This contention was upheld by the execution Court which … inter alia that the amounts sought to be attached were part of their wages and that under Section 60 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, no part of their wages could be attached. This contention was upheld

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1962

Registrar, High Court, A.S., Bombay Vs. S.K. Irani and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-05-1962

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 1, 1(5), 2, 3, 3(2), 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(3), 15(3-A), 15(4), 15(5), 15(6), 15A(1), 15A(2), 16, 17, 17(1), 17A(1), 17A(2), 17B(1), 18, 19, 20, 20(1), 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 26(1); Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 19 and 228; Payment of Wages (Procedure) Rules, 1937 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 8(2), 8(3), 9, 9(3), 11, 12 and 13; Evidence Act - Sections 3; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; States (Laws) Act, 1951; Revenue Recovery Act, 1890 - Sections 5; Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 195; Government

Reported in : AIR1963Bom254; (1963)65BOMLR131; 1963CriLJ603; ILR1963Bom115

power to attach property pending an appeal and Sub-section (2) of Section 17A provides that the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), relating to attachment before judgment under that Code shall, so far … Act. Section 4 requires the employer to fix wags periods. Section 5 prescribes the time of payment of wages. Section 7 enumerates deductions which the employer could make from the wages payable to his employees. Section 8 deals … the eight companion Application Nos 29/2, 4008, 4802, of 1960 and 147, 695, 1596, 2879, 4229 or 1961 stand disposed of. The application of 28th

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 1963

Keki Ardeshir Master Vs. Kotwal A.G.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-04-1963

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act; Payment of Wages Act

Reported in : 1963MhLJ382

power to attach property pending an appeal and Sub-section (2) of S. 17A provides that the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), relating to attachment before judgment under that Code shall, so far … the Act. Section 4 requires the employer to fix wage-periods. Section 5 prescribes the time of payment of wages. Section 7 enumerates deductions which the employer could make from the wages payable to its employees. Section 8 deals … the eight companion Application Nos. 2972, 4008, 4802 of 1960 and 147, 695, 1596, 2879, 4229 of 1961 stand disposed of. The application of 28

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2016

Yesumithra Sabanna Vs. Chief Manager, Nitin Arun Nivsarkar, Central Ra ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-22-2016

Subject : MRTP

the Respondent's challenge to the refusal of the Revisional Court for sanction of prosecution under Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is concerned, it is apparent from the record that what the Respondent alleges as false … to reinstate the first Respondent employee in his original post with continuity of service and with 50% back wages. Writ Petition No.638 of 2016 is filed by the first Respondent employee challenging the revisional order referred to … 4 July 1995, i.e. the date of his subsequent transfer to Mumbai. 6. The Industrial Court appears to have wrongly referred to Clauses 3 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 1973

Dilbagh Rai Jarry Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-05-1973

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Railway Establishment Code - Rule 2044; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 15(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 509; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 6, Rule 18

Reported in : AIR1974SC130; [1973(27)FLR428]; 1974LabIC149; (1974)ILLJ164SC; (1974)3SCC554; [1974]2SCR178; 1974(6)LC1(SC); (1973)3SCC554

Act.22. The contention is untenable. While it is true that Rules 17 and 18 of Order 6 of the Code do not, in terms, apply to amendment of an application under Section 15(2), the Authority is competent to … he had been reinstated to the post of Guard 'C' Grade and that the matter of his back wages for the period between the date of his dismissal and the date of reinstatement would be decided later

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2022

Sunil Kumar Jain Vs. Sundaresh Bhatt

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-19-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the IB Code defines “Insolvency Resolution Process Cost”. It is submitted that as per Section 5(13) of the Code, “Insolvency Resolution Process Cost” means any 9 costs incurred by the RP in running the business of the … an email to HR Department of Corporate Debtor instructing strictly not to 6 relieve or permit resignation of any employee/workmen, without written approval. 6.1 It … operations at Dahej Yard were not suspended, the workmen/employees at Dahej Yard are entitled to at least the wages/salaries during the CIRP period. It is submitted that irrespective of whether the wages/salaries for the period during CIRP

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 1971

The Indian Link ChaIn Manufacturers Ltd. Vs. their Workmen

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-17-1971

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 19(2); Payment of Bonus Act - Sections 4, 6 and 23; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Income Tax Act - Sections 32(1)

Reported in : AIR1972SC343; 1972LabIC200; (1971)IILLJ581SC; (1971)2SCC759; [1972]1SCR790

a notice required to be given in suits against the Govt. under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code is neither apt nor is it applicable to cases where as a matter of public policy a written … omission by the Tribunal to grant an adjustment in the wage scale by directing a fitment of the wages of workmen in the said scales in accordance with the length of their service is assailed. It is … not pressed.2. The workman have also filed an Appeal (Civil Appeal No. 610 of 1967) against the Award in which the omission by the Tribunal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial