Advanced Search Results

Madanlal Tantia of Bombay and Others Vs. Collector of Bombay and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 49, 49(2) and (3); Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code - Sections 267

Reported in : (1993)ILLJ502Bom

the amount is recoverable as wages the provisions of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and Section 267 of the Code would also apply. In the present case, therefore the word 'employer' in the context of wages payable to … question involved in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is whether the provisions of Section 49(3) of the Maharashtra Co-op. Societies Act, 1960 under which the employer deducts certain agreed and stipulate amounts to

The New Phaltan Sugar Works Ltd. and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 529, 529A and 530; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 49, 49(1), 49(2) and 49(3); Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22 and 22(1); Constitution of India - Article 21; Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 267

Reported in : 2004(4)ALLMR426; 2004(4)BomCR800; (2004)IIILLJ79Bom; 2004(3)MhLj266; [2004]56SCL618(Bom)

personally liable under Section 49(3) of the said Act read with Section 267 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. After considering the object of the Section 49(3) the learned Judge held that Section 49 proceeds on … 1 was to deduct the instalments payable by the employees from the wages payable to such employees. The petitioner No. 1 in fact had deducted … 7 are its Directors. The Respondent No. 5 had moved the respondent No. 4 under the provisions of Section 49 of the Maharashtra Co-operative societies Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). It was the case

Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking Vs. Basanti Devi and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 3 and 18; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 182 and 237; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; Payment of Wages Act; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 49; Constitutioin of India - Articles 129 and 142; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 35A - Order 41, Rule 33; Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 42

Reported in : AIR2000SC43; [1999]98CompCas695(SC); 1999(3)CTC558; JT1999(7)SC486; RLW2000(1)SC9; 1999(6)SCALE236; (1999)8SCC229; [1999]Supp3SCR219; 1999(2)LC1536(SC)

specimen in the brochure, relevant paras of which we quote : Dear Sir,Re. : Salary Savings Scheme P.A. Code No. ...In order to make the benefits of your Salary Savings Scheme available to our employees, we agree … his premiums at concessional rates. Deduction of premium from the salary or wages of an employee and its remittance to the Life Insurance Corporation is … LIC is a body corporate constituted under the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956. It has framed regulations under Section 49 of the Act called the Life Insurance Corporation of India (Agents) Regulation, 1972. In view of the amendment

Livadas Vs. Bradshaw

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

NINTH CIRCUIT No. 92-1920. Argued April 26, 1994-Decided June 13, 1994 California law requires employers to pay all wages due immediately upon an employee's discharge, Labor Code § 201; imposes a penalty for refusal to pay promptly, … to discharged workers contradicts Labor Code § 219, which expressly and categorically prohibits the modification of rules under the Code by "private agreement." Even at face value, however, the "hands off" label poses special dangers that advantages conferred … Labor Code § 203 was pre-empted here, since they establish that the section does not broadly pre-empt nonnegotiable employee rights conferred by state law; that … for special caution here. See Golden State Transit Corp. v. Los Angeles, 493 U. S. 103 , 108-112. Pp. 132-135. 987 F.2d 552 , reversed.

Otte Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

provisions of the New York City Administrative Code to withhold taxes from the payment of priority claims for wages earned by employees prior to the employer's bankruptcy, but unpaid at the inception of the bankruptcy proceeding. The … Treas.Reg. 128 § 408.226(a) (1951); Treas.Reg. 106 § 402.227(a) (1940). The fact that the FICA withholding provisions of the Code do not define "employer" is of no significance, for that term is not to be given a narrower … re Dale, 111 F.Supp. 109, 111 (Me.1953). A. The requirement of withholding. Section 3402(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 3402(a), requires "[e]very … his employer," and § 3401(d) defines "employer" as Page 419 U. S. 49 "the person for whom an individual performs or performed any service, of

Kohinoor Tobacco Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Second Labo ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 10 and 22; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2)

Reported in : AIR1986Bom340; 1986(3)BomCR106; (1985)87BOMLR387

Section 22 of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965?Whether the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 is a complete Code for bonus payable under the said Act? If the answer is in affirmative, whether an application under Section … by the employees for computation of claims for minimum bonus under the Bonus Act as well as minimum wages under the Minimum Wages Act. The employer rushed to the Court for this writ even without filing a … Agency (supra) and (ii) in Jaidev v. Ramanbhai (Letters Patent Appeal No. 49 of 1980 decided on 31-3-1981), have taken a view that Section 39

Abdul Aziz Ansari Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 34, 48(1) and 48(2); Bombay Sales Tax (Procedure) Rules, 1954 - Rule 42; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1946 - Sections 2(3), 12(3-A), 23, 24, 24(1), 24(2), 30(2), 31(1), 33, 49, 49(2), 50 and 50(2); Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 7; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 20, Rule 1; Payment of Wages (Procedure) Rules, 1937 - Rule 8 and 8(3)

Reported in : AIR1958Bom279; (1957)59BOMLR1259; ILR1958Bom375; [1958]9STC135(Bom)

out that this case turned on the specific provisions of Order XX, Rule 1, of the Civil Procedure Code, which require that a judgment shall be pronounced in open Court, and if it was not so delivered, … (A). We were there concerned with Rule 8 of the Payment of Wages (Procedure) Rules, 1937. The proviso to Sub-rule (3) of Rule 8 was … there is no warrant in law. 9. Attention was also drawn by Mr. Palkhi-wala to the provisions of Section 49 of the Act of 1953. That section deals with liabilities that arose under the Ordinance of 1952. That

National Investigation Agency vs Abdul Jaleel

Court : Kerala

filed an appeal against the acquittal under Sections 120(B), 122, 124(A), 465 & 471 of the Indian Penal Code, of those who were convicted under the other offences alleged. I. THE PROLOGUE:-2. The prosecution case is that … filed the final report has filed an appeal against the acquittal under Sections 120(B), 122, 124(A), 465 & 471 of the Indian Penal Code, of … accused are alleged to have conspired to incite young men, radicalise them and recruit them into terrorism to wage war against their own country. The sole recruit left alive, developed cold feet, ran back to the bosom … India (SIMI). A1 wasfound using two mobile numbers 97443 82047 and 96057 49262 alternatively. PW158 obtained the call details of the first mobile number, which,

Sabir P. Buhari @ Sabir vs State

Court : Kerala

filed an appeal against the acquittal under Sections 120(B), 122, 124(A), 465 & 471 of the Indian Penal Code, of those who were convicted under the other offences alleged. I. THE PROLOGUE:-2. The prosecution case is that … filed the final report has filed an appeal against the acquittal under Sections 120(B), 122, 124(A), 465 & 471 of the Indian Penal Code, of … accused are alleged to have conspired to incite young men, radicalise them and recruit them into terrorism to wage war against their own country. The sole recruit left alive, developed cold feet, ran back to the bosom … India (SIMI). A1 wasfound using two mobile numbers 97443 82047 and 96057 49262 alternatively. PW158 obtained the call details of the first mobile number, which,

M.H.Faisal vs State of Kerala, Rep. by Nia

Court : Kerala

filed an appeal against the acquittal under Sections 120(B), 122, 124(A), 465 & 471 of the Indian Penal Code, of those who were convicted under the other offences alleged. I. THE PROLOGUE:-2. The prosecution case is that … filed the final report has filed an appeal against the acquittal under Sections 120(B), 122, 124(A), 465 & 471 of the Indian Penal Code, of … accused are alleged to have conspired to incite young men, radicalise them and recruit them into terrorism to wage war against their own country. The sole recruit left alive, developed cold feet, ran back to the bosom … India (SIMI). A1 wasfound using two mobile numbers 97443 82047 and 96057 49262 alternatively. PW158 obtained the call details of the first mobile number, which,