Advanced Search Results

Emperor Vs. Hasrat Mohani

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1922)24BOMLR885; 75Ind.Cas.299

Section 121, Indian Penal Code.14. It is desirable to point out that in view of the explanation to Section 35 of the Criminal Procedure Code and the provisions of Section 7l of the Indian Penal Code as interpreted … of war against the King within the meaning of that section, that is, he instigated his audience to wage such war. Whether the accused did so or not is a question of fact to be decided mainly

Basavaraj Chenna Naik Vs. General Manager

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20(1) and 20(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397

Reported in : ILR1985KAR2172; 1985(2)KarLJ371

ORDERNarayana Rai Kudoor, J.1. This Criminal Revision under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the Code') is directed against the Judgment and order dated 17th January, 1983, … No. 16/82 dismissing the complaint filed by the petitioners and several others under Section 20(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (for short 'the Act'). I shall refer to the parties in the course of this order … by virtue of the office he holds. In this5. 1975 (2) KLJ 352 background let me now proceed to consider whether the Magistrate at Sirsi

P. Manohar Reddy Vs. Appellate Authority Under Section 53 of the A.P. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 - Sections 2(23), 35, 36, 37, 38, 47, 48, 50, 51, 51(1), 51(2), 53 and 55; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 to 13, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(3), 17, 18, 20 and 22; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25FF, 25FFF and 33C(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193, 219 and 228; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 554 and 610; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : 2007(6)ALD686; 2007(6)ALT76; (2008)ILLJ1117AP

and, thereunder, every authority appointed under Section 50 shall have all the powers of a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for the purpose of taking evidence and of enforcing attendance of witnesses, compelling production … he shall be entitled, in respect of such overtime work, to wages at twice the ordinary rate of wages. Section 38, which prescribes the time of payment of wages, reads thus:Time of payment of wages:- (1) The wages … Ors. 1990(2) LLJ 39, Bhagaband Colliery v. Their Workmen 1962 (2) ILJ 356, Algemene Bank, Nederland, N v. Central Govt., Labour Court, Calcutta 1977 (2)

Brooklyn Savings Bank Vs. O'Neil

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

brought solely to recover liquidated damages. The jurisdiction of this Court rests on Section 237(b) of the Judicial Code. No. 554 The petitioner in this second case operated a box factory in which he employed the respondent … liquidated damages under § 16(b) does not depend on whether the employee is compelled to sue for minimum wages due. P. 324 U. S. 711 . 5. Absence from the Fair Labor Standards Act of a specific … statutory policy. Midstate Horticultural Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 320 U. S. 356 , 320 U. S. 361 ; Phillips v. Grand Trunk Western R.

Karantikari Suraksha Rakshak Sanghatana Vs. State of Maharashtra and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and IndustrialConstitution

Acts : Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) (Amendment) Act, 1996; Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) (Amendment) Act, 1981 - Sections 1(4), 3, 3(4), 6, 8, 10, 10(2), 11, 12, 15, 15(2), 19, 20, 21, 21(4), 22 and 23; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Workmen's Compensation Rules; Payment of Wages Rules; Maternity Benefit Rules; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Maternity Benefits Act, 1961; Maharashtra Mathadi and Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969; Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment Act, 1948; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 46, 254 and 254(2)

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR401; 2006(6)BomCR673

insisted upon nor remedies or forums not mentioned therein can be availed of. The legislation is a complete code by itself and it is not open for the parties to look for any other rights and obligations, … body of individuals or a body corporate, who or which employs Security Guards in his or its employment on wages and undertakes to execute any security work or watch and ward work on contract, for any factory or … the objections and suggestions only the duplication of the work is avoided. 35. According to Mr. Kumbhakoni, the criticism of the amendment of Sections 19, … principal respondent to these three Petitions. The Security Guards Board constituted under Section 6 of the said Act is also joined as a respondent. Some

Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. K.V. Shramik Sangh and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 4, 7, 10, 10(1), (2) and 12; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 61(2), 61C, 365, 367 and 368; Constitution of India - Article 226; Minimum Wages Act, 1949

Reported in : AIR2002SC1815; 2002(2)ALLMR(SC)975; 2002(5)BomCR718; (2002)3BOMLR718; [2002(93)FLR838]; JT2002(4)SC115; 2002LabIC1672; (2002)IILLJ544SC; 2002(3)SCALE532; (2002)4SCC609; [20

in the light of rival contentions raised by the parties. We have detailed them above to say so.21. The code of conduct relating to election related to 1998. The High Court at the time of passing the impugned … to treat all the workmen concerned with this case on par with the permanent workmen in terms of wages and all services conditions.....' 4. In reply to the writ petition the Corporation in the affidavit filed on … basis. Respondent No. 34 is the State of Maharashtra and respondent No. 35 is theContract Labour Board established under the provisions of the Contract Labour … labour system observing that Solid Waste Management Department is one of the sections of the Corporation, which is in operation for more than hundred years;

Patan Jamal Vali Vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

MOs 1 to 8. On the closure of the evidence, the appellant was examined under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. By a judgment dated 19 February 2013 the Special Judge for the Trial of … the others. When they assert their rights and resist practices of un-touchability against them or demand statutory minimum wages or refuse to do any bonded and forced labour, the vested interests try to cow them down and … survivors of sexual violence with the criminal justice system and the judiciary 35 In the wake of the Nirbhaya rape incident that shocked the conscience

M.C. Bhat Vs. Syndicate Bank

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Syndicate Bank Officers Rules, 1966 - Rule 35; Syndicate Bank Officer Employees Regulations, 1976 - Regulations 6(7) and 12

Reported in : ILR1995KAR86; 1995(1)KarLJ468; (1996)ILLJ210Kant

and enquiry in respect of or criminal trial in respect of criminal offence is provided under Chapter-13 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, vide., Section-178 of the Code.21. So clause (b) of Regulation-12 of 1976 Regulations refers to … Regulations, 1976, as found by the punishing authority. Punishing authority has further ordered that as regard the back wages the petitioner shall not be eligible for any back wages for the period of suspension as well as … During the period of suspension, you will be paid as per Rule- 35(k) of the aforesaid Rules, Subsistence Allowance as under:- 1. For the first

United States Vs. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

total wages (as defined in section 3306(b)) paid by [the employer] during the calendar year." Section 3121(a) of the Code establishes the annual ceiling on wages subject to Social Security tax. It does so by defining "wages" to … have been paid. The Court agrees with the Company that Social Security Bd. v. Nierotko, 327 U. S. 358 , undermines the Government's plain language argument. The Nierotko Court concluded that, for purposes of determining a wrongfully

Tradesvel Security Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1982)84BOMLR608

a large army of casual workers on temporary basis for years together thus avoiding the payment of fair wages and the granting of the terminal benefits and other facilities such as leave, medical care, etc. to them. … of the total security guards enjoyed the benefit of gratuity. Likewise, only 35 agents engaging 2792 security guards were covered by the Employees' State Insurance … worthwhile to reproduce them verbatim. What was in issue there was the challenge to Section 15(2)(b) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908, whereunder the State Government had declared a Society called the People's Education Society an