Advanced Search Results
HafizuddIn Adult Son of Sri MajeeduddIn Vs. Additional District Judge ...
Allahabad
Dec-15-2005
Service
Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 3(2), 4(2), 8, 15, 15(2), 15(4), 17, 17(1), 17(2), 31, 81, 82, 85, 86, 86(1), 117 and 417(4); Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4 to 24 and 29(2); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 47(1) and 97; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 29; Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 2, 25 and 26; West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Sections 8; Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 33C(2) - Schedule - Article 137; Kerala Rent Act, 1965 - Sections 18; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act; Rent Control Act - Sections 23 and 23(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act; Punjab Rent Restriction Act; Securities Act, 1992; Karnataka Land R
[2006(109)FLR877]; (2006)IIILLJ276All
Matched in: Parties HafizuddIn Adult Son of Sri MajeeduddIn Vs. Additional District Judge (Court No. 1) (Appellate Authority Under Payment of Wages Act) and Union of India (Uoi) Through Divisional Railway Manager Allahabad Division, Northern Railway
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNalgonda Co-op. Marketing Society Ltd. Vs. Labour Court and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-18-1993
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 7; Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1966 - Sections 41(3); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
1993(2)ALT661; 1993(2)ALT661; [1995(70)FLR680]; (1994)IILLJ716AP; (1994)IILLJ716SC
Court, Tribunal and National Tribunal shall have the same powers as are vested in a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), when trying a suit, in respect of the following matters namely:- … it stood prior to its amendment).The Payment of Wages Act, 1936 prescribes period of limitation for recovery of wages. Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not prescribe any period of limitation for recovery of any … is necessary that the controversy relating to the application of Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act to proceedings before a Labour Court constituted under Section 7 of the Industrial Disputes
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNandlall and Sons Tea Industries (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Assam ...
Guwahati
Mar-16-2007
Constitution
Amitava Roy, J.1. The validity of the proceedings under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (hereafter referred to as the Wages Act) as well as that under the Bengal Public Demands … thereof lacked bonafide as well, he urged. Mr. Agarwal contended that in any view of the matter, the procedure prescribed under Section 15(3) of the Act not having been observed, the purported proceeding before the Assistant Labour … The petitioners having received the notice on 12.4.2004 submitted an application on 29.4.2004 before the said authority denying their liability. It was asserted inter alia
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Barindra Kumar Ghose and ors. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Nov-23-1909
Criminal
(1910)ILR37Cal467
under Sections 121, 121A and 122 of the Indian Penal Code.25. It is provided by Section 196 of the Code of Criminal Procedure that no Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under Chapter VI of the … of the Indian Penal Code.78. Section 121 is in these terms: 'Whoever wages war against the Queen, or attempts to wage such war, or abets … in answer to questions were admissible against him, and now we have statutory recognition of this view in Section 29 of the Evidence Act. Therefore, the mere fact that a statement was elicited by a question does not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBarihdra Kumar Ghose and ors. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Nov-23-1909
Criminal
7Ind.Cas.359
under Sections 121, 121A and 122 of the Indian Penal Code.21. It is provided by Section 196 of the Code of Criminal Procedure that no Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under Chapter VI of the … of the Indian Penal Code.69. Section 121 is in these terms: 'Whoever wages war against the Queen, or attempts to wage such war, or abets … in answer to questions were admissible against him, and now we have statutory recognition of this view in Section 29 of the Evidence Act. Therefore, the mere fact that a statement was elicited by a question does not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBibhu Charan Barua Vs. Nani Gopaldeva Goswami and ors.
Guwahati
Aug-16-2007
Property
passed in Misc (J) Case No. 4/2007 registered on an application filed under Order 21, Rule 29 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the 'Code') in Title Execution Case No. 1/2007 by the respondent-plaintiff, … the industry. Being similarly caught in the vertex the petitioner was compelled to defer the payment of labour wages and other statutory dues in the tea estate. A labour unrest surfaced, a common phenomenon which then plagued … disposal of the aforementioned suit. By the said order, the application under Section 47 of the Code submitted for stay of the execution proceeding by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSayyed Mohammed Naushad Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Nov-14-2022
Land Acquisition
the statement of the accused Nos.1 to 6 and 13 was recorded as contemplated under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The accused Nos.1, 3, 6 and 6 filed their statements under Section 313(5) of the … making a recommendation by the Authority.- The Authority shall, under sub-section - 29 - CRL.A No.1206 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No.820 of 2017 (2) of … unlawful meetings to make the Indian Government insecure and to spoil the unity of the Nation. Further, to wage war against India, the accused persons collected arms and manufactured the ammunitions, conspired and possessed the arms, illegally,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr.fakir Ahmed Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Nov-14-2022
Land Acquisition
the statement of the accused Nos.1 to 6 and 13 was recorded as contemplated under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The accused Nos.1, 3, 6 and 6 filed their statements under Section 313(5) of the … making a recommendation by the Authority.- The Authority shall, under sub-section - 29 - CRL.A No.1206 of 2017 C/W CRL.A No.820 of 2017 (2) of … unlawful meetings to make the Indian Government insecure and to spoil the unity of the Nation. Further, to wage war against India, the accused persons collected arms and manufactured the ammunitions, conspired and possessed the arms, illegally,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadhu Sudan Gupta Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-02-1991
Civil
Recruitment and Conditions of Service Rules, 1976 - Rules 12, 13 and 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rules 1 and 7
1991(0)MPLJ712
implicated for an offence of accepting bribe of Rs. 50/- and was tried Under Section 161, Indian Penal Code, and Section 5(1)(a) and (b) read with Section 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947; as a … application (Ext.P-3l with a photostat Copy of Judgment (Ext.P-1) for reinstating him in service and to pay back wages from 29-9-1976. On 1-11-1980 vide Ext. P-4 the Executive Engineer gave a fresh temporary appointment as Time Keeper,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHind Majdoor Sabha, U.P. Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Dec-09-1998
ServiceLimitation
Payment of Wages Act, 1972 - Sections 15, 15(2) and (3) and 17; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 and 5; Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 - Sections 29(2) and 97(1); Special Act
1999(1)AWC126; (2000)IILLJ583All
if the scheme of special law and the nature of the remedy provided therein amount to a complete Code in itself, then the provisions of the Limitation Act must be held to be necessarily excluded. 8. In … Aloke Chakrabarti, J.1. Two tube-well operators filed an application under Section 15(2) of the Payment of Wages Act through the present petitioner contending that respondent-employers illegally made deductions from their wages for the period between … 480 ; Mukri Copalan v. C. P. Aboobacker, JT 1995 15) SC 296 and Vidyacharan Shukla v. Khubachand Beghel. AIR 1964 SC 1099. 3. It
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »