Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the code on wages section 25 · Page 1 of about 3,539 results (0.051 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 08 1961

Sita Ram and ors. Vs. Bashi Ram Gobind Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-08-1961

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 25, 26, 30, 31, 35, 45, 48, 54, 141 and 152 - Order 9, Rules 8 and 9 - Order XXII - Order XXXVIII; Displaced Persons (Debts Adjustment) Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 3, 10, 25, 31 and 44; Displaced Persons (Claims) Act, 1950 - Sections 10 and 13; Indian Limitation Act, 1908; Land Acquisition Act; Workmen's Compensation Act; Payment of Wages Act - Sections 15(3); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1962P& H239

appeal must be allowed. The contention of the learned counsel for the appellants is that by reason of section 25 of the Act, the Code applies to all proceedings under the Act and, therefore, the dismissal in default … Pun LR 477: (AIR 1946 Lah 316)(FB) wherein the question was whether an authority under the Payment of Wages Act is a Court subordinate to the High Court, and it was held that the authority was a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2016

Abdul Raheman @ Shami Ahmed Sha and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Jul-20-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

thereby convicting the appellant/accused for the offence punishable under Sections 121, 122, 124(A) of Indian Penal Code, under Section 25 of Arms Act 1959 and under Section 4 and 5 of explosive Acts 1908 and the appellant/accused is … encouraging Ahle Hadis Muslm students to join unlawful organisation of Lashkar-E-Toiba and in the pretext of Jihad to wage-war against the India and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 10, 13, 18, 20, 21 and 23

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 14 1999

Parmeshwarnarayan Vs. Collector and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-14-1999

Subject : Company

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985 - Sections 16, 17, 22, 22(1) and 25

Reported in : (2000)1GLR521

Constitution of India has prayed to direct the Collector, Ahmedabad to initiate proceedings under the Bombay Land Revenue Code against the respondent No. 2 in pursuance of the recovery certificate issued by the Labour Court dated 27th … respondent No. 2. Since the petitioner was not paid the amount of wages due, he filed Recovery Application No. 3121 of 1990 in the labour … 17 is under preparation or consideration or a sanctioned scheme is under implementation or where an appeal under section 25 relating to an industrial company is pending, then, notwithstanding anything contained in the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 11 2006

Javed @ Java Ahmed Mohammed Akbar Bhatt and ors. Vs. the State of Maha ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-11-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 3, 3(1) and 25(1B); Evidence Act - Sections 111A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 121, 121A and 122

Reported in : 2007CriLJ1386

it would be appropriate to set out a few sections of the Indian Penal Code. Chapter VI of the Code enlists offences against the State. It deals with offences which undermine the authority of the Government by subversive … Waging, or attempting to wage war, or abetting waging of war, against the Government of India. - Whoever, wages war against the Government of India, or attempts to wage such war, or abets the waging of such … Nishita Mhatre, J.1. The accused who have been convicted under Section 122 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment … have also been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 3 and 25(1B)(a) of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for three years.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 2002

Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited and ors. Vs. Ramesh Kamble ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-09-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972 - Sections 25, 39, 44 and 48(1)

Reported in : [2003(96)FLR970]; 2003(1)MhLj178

groundless, but that does not mean that the accused cannot approach the High Court under Section 482 of the Code or Article 227 of the Constitution to have the proceeding quashed against him when the complaint does not … the criminal complaint was to pressurise the petitioners to pay three days wages of the strike period which were deducted from the wages of the … aforesaid three days in spite of pendency of the Conciliation Proceedings. The petitioner, therefore, filed a Reference under Section 25 read with Section 24 of the M.R.T.U. and PULP Act, 1971 for declaration that the said strike was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2003

Sstate Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-29-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorists Activities Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 3(1), 4, 6, 20 and 32 and 50; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1), 15 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162, 196, 218, 366, 367 and 368; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, 65B(2), 138 and 146; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120, 120B, 121, 302 and 307

Reported in : 2003VIIAD(Delhi)1; 107(2003)DLT385; 2003(71)DRJ178; 2003(3)JCC1669

rely. After all, the identification parade belongs to the stage of investigation and there are no provisions in the Code of Criminal Procedure which make it mandatory for the Investigating Agency to conduct a test identification parade, nor … confession has to be thrown out and not taken into evidence at all. As per the mandate of Section 25, confession made to a police officer cannot be proved. Under Section 26, confessions made by a person to … 122 IPC makes it an offence to collect arms or ammunition to wage war against the Government of India. We accordingly hold accused Afzal and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2007

State of Gujarat Vs. Shahnawaz Abdulgafur Bhatti

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-07-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 25(1), 25(1AA), 25(1B) and 39; Foreigners Act, 1964 - Sections 13(2) and 14; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 4, 5, 6 and 7; Evidence Act - Sections 25 and 27; Prisoners Act; Indian Wireless and Telegraphs Act, 1933 - Sections 3 and 6(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 121, 121A, 122 and 123, 124A, 196, 313, 374(2); Indian Passport Rules, 1950 - Rules 3 and 5, 6; Foreigners Order, 1948 - Rules 3(5) and 5(2); Indian Foreigners (Report to Police) Orders, 1971; Criminal Law Amendment 1961; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 366(1); Constitution of India - Articles 17, 29, 18, 19, 22 to 30 32 to 37 to 60, 309, 347 and 362

Reported in : (2008)1GLR346

the proceedings of Sessions Case Nos. 11 of 2002 and 18 of 2003 made under Section 366(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure ('the Code' for short) by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 2, … to refer to Section 121 of I.P.C., which reads as under:121. Whoever wages war against the Government of India, or attempts to wage such war, … accused was in custody from 27-5-2001. Therefore, the F.I.R. based on his confessional statement is clearly hit by Section 25 of the Evidence Act. Therefore also the F.I.R., Exh. 41, which is not first in point of time,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2005

HafizuddIn Adult Son of Sri MajeeduddIn Vs. Additional District Judge ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-15-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 3(2), 4(2), 8, 15, 15(2), 15(4), 17, 17(1), 17(2), 31, 81, 82, 85, 86, 86(1), 117 and 417(4); Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4 to 24 and 29(2); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 47(1) and 97; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 29; Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 2, 25 and 26; West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Sections 8; Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 33C(2) - Schedule - Article 137; Kerala Rent Act, 1965 - Sections 18; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act; Rent Control Act - Sections 23 and 23(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act; Punjab Rent Restriction Act; Securities Act, 1992; Karnataka Land R

Reported in : [2006(109)FLR877]; (2006)IIILLJ276All

Matched in: Parties HafizuddIn Adult Son of Sri MajeeduddIn Vs. Additional District Judge (Court No. 1) (Appellate Authority Under Payment of Wages Act) and Union of India (Uoi) Through Divisional Railway Manager Allahabad Division, Northern Railway

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 1909

Barindra Kumar Ghose and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-23-1909

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1910)ILR37Cal467

under Sections 121, 121A and 122 of the Indian Penal Code.25. It is provided by Section 196 of the Code of Criminal Procedure that no Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under Chapter VI of the … of the Indian Penal Code.78. Section 121 is in these terms: 'Whoever wages war against the Queen, or attempts to wage such war, or abets … what is described in the head-note as 'a statement in the nature of a confession' was inadmissible under Section 25 of the Evidence Act, it having been made to a police-officer. I have had the advantage of examining

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 1945

Brooklyn Savings Bank Vs. O'Neil

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-09-1945

Subject : Land Acquisition

brought solely to recover liquidated damages. The jurisdiction of this Court rests on Section 237(b) of the Judicial Code. No. 554 The petitioner in this second case operated a box factory in which he employed the respondent … liquidated damages under § 16(b) does not depend on whether the employee is compelled to sue for minimum wages due. P. 324 U. S. 711 . 5. Absence from the Fair Labor Standards Act of a specific … as was upheld in Fort Smith & Western R. Co. v. Mill, 253 U. S. 206 , are not here involved. P. 324 U. S.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial