Advanced Search Results

The Indian Link ChaIn Manufacturers Ltd. Vs. their Workmen

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 19(2); Payment of Bonus Act - Sections 4, 6 and 23; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Income Tax Act - Sections 32(1)

Reported in : AIR1972SC343; 1972LabIC200; (1971)IILLJ581SC; (1971)2SCC759; [1972]1SCR790

a notice required to be given in suits against the Govt. under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code is neither apt nor is it applicable to cases where as a matter of public policy a written … an adjustment in the wage scale by directing a fitment of the wages of workmen in the said scales in accordance with the length of … Section 2 of the Act. It was averred that as this settlement was binding upon the parties under Section 19(2) of the Act for a period of six months from 5th April '63 and would continue to bind

General Manager, N.E. Rly. and ors. Vs. Shri Pat and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1987)IILLJ377All

respects he is given the same powers as are given to ordinary Civil Courts of the land by the Code of Civil Procedure including the power to summon and examine witnesses on oath, the power to order inspection … enforcement of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the jurisdiction of the Prescribed Authority, constituted under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, in respect of the remuneration relating to persons employed in connection with the affairs of the … pending in this Court. Meanwhile Respondent No. 1 made an application under Section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act to the Prescribed Authority claiming … rise is whether subsequent to the enforcement of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the jurisdiction of the Prescribed Authority, constituted under the Payment of Wages

State of Goa Vs. Babu Thomas

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3, 7, 10, 11, 13, 13(1), 15, 19, 19(1) and 19(3); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 161 and 165; ;Goa Shipyard Officer's Conduct, Disciplines and Appeal Rules, 1979; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : AIR2005SC3606; 2005CriLJ4379; JT2005(12)SC204; 2005(7)SCALE659; (2005)8SCC130; 2005(2)LC1405(SC)

of Section 19 of the Act. Sub-section 3 of Section 19 reads as under:'(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), -(a) no finding, sentence or order passed by a special Judge … of M/s. Tirumala Services in order to show favour for settlement of wages, bills/arrears, certification of pending bills and to show favour in the day-to-day … of Directors/Company. In paragraph 3 of the said sanction order it is noticed that the sanction required under Section 19 of the Act was granted.4. It is undisputed that the sanction for prosecution of the respondent was granted

Registrar, High Court, A.S., Bombay Vs. S.K. Irani and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 1, 1(5), 2, 3, 3(2), 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(3), 15(3-A), 15(4), 15(5), 15(6), 15A(1), 15A(2), 16, 17, 17(1), 17A(1), 17A(2), 17B(1), 18, 19, 20, 20(1), 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 26(1); Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 19 and 228; Payment of Wages (Procedure) Rules, 1937 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 8(2), 8(3), 9, 9(3), 11, 12 and 13; Evidence Act - Sections 3; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; States (Laws) Act, 1951; Revenue Recovery Act, 1890 - Sections 5; Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 195; Government

Reported in : AIR1963Bom254; (1963)65BOMLR131; 1963CriLJ603; ILR1963Bom115

'Court' as follows :'Court' includes all Judges and Magistrates, and all persons, except arbitrators, legally authorised to take evidence.'Section 19 of the Indian Penal Code defines 'Judge' in following terms :'The word 'Judge' denotes not only every person … Act. Section 4 requires the employer to fix wags periods. Section 5 prescribes the time of payment of wages. Section 7 enumerates deductions which the employer could make from the wages payable to his employees. Section 8 deals

The Management of Southern Roadways (P.) Limited Vs. D. Venkateswarlu ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1971)1MLJ97

with fixing of hours for a normal working day and Section 14 deals with overtime work and overtime wages. Section 19 deals with appointment of Inspectors and Section 20 deals with claims and it is as follows:20. Claims. - … be final.(7) Every Authority appointed under Sub-section (1) shall have all the powers of a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908) for the purpose of taking evidence and of enforcing the attendance

Keki Ardeshir Master Vs. Kotwal A.G.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act; Payment of Wages Act

Reported in : 1963MhLJ382

follows : ''Court' includes all Judges and Magistrates, and all persons, except arbitrators, legally authorized to take evidence.'13. Section 19 of the Indian Penal Code defines 'Judge' in the following terms : 'The word 'Judge' denotes not only … the Act. Section 4 requires the employer to fix wage-periods. Section 5 prescribes the time of payment of wages. Section 7 enumerates deductions which the employer could make from the wages payable to its employees. Section 8 deals

Tradesvel Security Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1982)84BOMLR608

on temporary basis for years together thus avoiding the payment of fair wages and the granting of the terminal benefits and other facilities such as … Sections 19 and 20 which have a direct bearing on the contentions advanced on behalf of the petitioners. Section 19 provides that the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and the rules made thereunder, shall mutatis mutandis, … worthwhile to reproduce them verbatim. What was in issue there was the challenge to Section 15(2)(b) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908, whereunder the State Government had declared a Society called the People's Education Society an

Karantikari Suraksha Rakshak Sanghatana Vs. State of Maharashtra and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and IndustrialConstitution

Acts : Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) (Amendment) Act, 1996; Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) (Amendment) Act, 1981 - Sections 1(4), 3, 3(4), 6, 8, 10, 10(2), 11, 12, 15, 15(2), 19, 20, 21, 21(4), 22 and 23; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Workmen's Compensation Rules; Payment of Wages Rules; Maternity Benefit Rules; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Maternity Benefits Act, 1961; Maharashtra Mathadi and Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969; Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment Act, 1948; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 46, 254 and 254(2)

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR401; 2006(6)BomCR673

insisted upon nor remedies or forums not mentioned therein can be availed of. The legislation is a complete code by itself and it is not open for the parties to look for any other rights and obligations, … body of individuals or a body corporate, who or which employs Security Guards in his or its employment on wages and undertakes to execute any security work or watch and ward work on contract, for any factory or … principal respondent to these three Petitions. The Security Guards Board constituted under Section 6 of the said Act is also joined as a respondent. Some … the Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) (Amendment) Act, 1996 be declared to be illegal and unconstitutional and be struck down.2. The

Burn and Co., Calcutta Vs. their Employees

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 19(4) and 19(6); Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950 - Sections 7(1); Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR1957SC38; (1957)ILLJ226SC; [1956]1SCR781

is on this principle that the rule of res judicata enacted in section 11 of the Civil Procedure Code is based. That section is no doubt, in terms inapplicable to the present matter, but the principle underlying … of service, and that further Shambunath Chatterjee was entitled to compensation at the rate of six months' basic wages with dearness allowance. As for Joydeb Banerjee, the Appellate Tribunal held that though his reinstatement was not desirable, … Against this decision, the Company has preferred Civil Appeal No. 325 of 1955 by special leave, and the Union has likewise preferred Civil Appeal No.

Brooklyn Savings Bank Vs. O'Neil

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

brought solely to recover liquidated damages. The jurisdiction of this Court rests on Section 237(b) of the Judicial Code. No. 554 The petitioner in this second case operated a box factory in which he employed the respondent … liquidated damages under § 16(b) does not depend on whether the employee is compelled to sue for minimum wages due. P. 324 U. S. 711 . 5. Absence from the Fair Labor Standards Act of a specific … (1945) Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'Neil No. 445 Argued February 5, 6, 1945 Decided April 9, 1945 * 324 U.S. 697 CERTIORARI TO THE COURT