Advanced Search Results
Om Sai Hotels and Restaurants, a Partnership Firm Duly Registered Unde ...
Mumbai
Sep-30-2003
Commercial
Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 1(3), 16 and 16(1), 25G; Indian Partnership Act
(2004)ILLJ895Bom; 2004(2)MhLj547
may arrest a person without intervention of the Court subject to the limitations specified under the provisions of the Code. The provisions of Section 41 of the Code provides for arrest by a Police Officer without an order … of the Petitioners. In fact, the Balance Sheet clearly indicates that the wages are being paid to employees. Depreciation is claimed in respect of the … denied the infancy period to the petitioner's establishment on two counts, firstly, that applying the amended provision of Section 16(1) of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, hereinafter called as 'the said Act', and secondly,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParmeshwarnarayan Vs. Collector and anr.
Gujarat
Jun-14-1999
Company
Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985 - Sections 16, 17, 22, 22(1) and 25
(2000)1GLR521
Constitution of India has prayed to direct the Collector, Ahmedabad to initiate proceedings under the Bombay Land Revenue Code against the respondent No. 2 in pursuance of the recovery certificate issued by the Labour Court dated 27th … respondent No. 2. Since the petitioner was not paid the amount of wages due, he filed Recovery Application No. 3121 of 1990 in the labour … Suspension of legal proceedings, contracts, etc. - (1) Where in respect of an industrial company, an inquiry under section 16 is pending or any scheme referred to under section 17 is under preparation or consideration or a sanctioned
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWorks Manager, Northern Railway Workshop Vs. Mathuradas, Painter
Rajasthan
Jan-12-1973
Service
1973(6)WLN25
who gave him the benefit of doubt and acquitted him of the offence under Section 323, Indian Penal Code, on 7/4/70 Mathuradas then applied for reinstatement and he was reinstated on 27/4/70 by order Ex. N--2 which runs … an order of the District Judge,, Bikaner, dismissing his appeal against an order of the the Payment of Wages Authority, passed on the application of Mathuradas respondent.2. Mathuradas was employed as a skilled painter in the Railway … inasmuch as you assaulted C/Man Shri U.C. Shukla T.No.2701 on 23/8/66 at 16-40 hrs, as a result of his lodging an official complaint against you
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sayyed Mohammed Naushad Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Nov-14-2022
Land Acquisition
the statement of the accused Nos.1 to 6 and 13 was recorded as contemplated under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The accused Nos.1, 3, 6 and 6 filed their statements under Section 313(5) of the … unlawful meetings to make the Indian Government insecure and to spoil the unity of the Nation. Further, to wage war against India, the accused persons collected arms and manufactured the ammunitions, conspired and possessed the arms, illegally, … undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months, for the offences punishable under Sections 16(1)(b), 17 and 18 respectively, of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967; to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr.fakir Ahmed Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Nov-14-2022
Land Acquisition
the statement of the accused Nos.1 to 6 and 13 was recorded as contemplated under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The accused Nos.1, 3, 6 and 6 filed their statements under Section 313(5) of the … unlawful meetings to make the Indian Government insecure and to spoil the unity of the Nation. Further, to wage war against India, the accused persons collected arms and manufactured the ammunitions, conspired and possessed the arms, illegally, … undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months, for the offences punishable under Sections 16(1)(b), 17 and 18 respectively, of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967; to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab Alias Abu Mujahid and Others Vs. St ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-29-2012
CriminalConstitution
Explosive Substance Act, 1908 ; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) 1973 - Section 366, 164(1)(2)(4), 163, 162, 161(2), 304, 315, 226, 229, 313, 39; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Section 16, 15; Explosives Act, 1884 ; Arms Act, 1959.; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 24, 25, 26, 27, 145, 32(1), 10; Constitution Of India - Article 20(3), 21, 22 (1), 156, 61, 219, 216, 217, 310, 309, 444, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 23, 25, 29, 32, 33, 427, 428, 517,; Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 32, 52; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section 5(1) (2),; Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 161, 165, 120-B,109, 179, 121A, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 176; Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 ; (THE) Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (TADA) Act, 43 of 1993 - Section 32,
(2012)9SCC1; JT2012(8)SC4; 2012(4)KCCR271(SN); 2012AIRSCW4942; AIR2012SC3565; 2012(7)SCALE553
or grievous hurt, and several other allied offences under the Penal Code (IPC), committing terrorist act punishable under Section 16 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, as well as offences under the Explosives Act, 1884, Explosive Substances Act, … crimes of a horrendous kind in this country. Some of the major charges against him were: conspiracy to wage war against the Government of India; collecting arms with the intention of waging war against the Government of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRegistrar, High Court, A.S., Bombay Vs. S.K. Irani and anr.
Mumbai
Dec-05-1962
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 1, 1(5), 2, 3, 3(2), 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(3), 15(3-A), 15(4), 15(5), 15(6), 15A(1), 15A(2), 16, 17, 17(1), 17A(1), 17A(2), 17B(1), 18, 19, 20, 20(1), 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 26(1); Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 19 and 228; Payment of Wages (Procedure) Rules, 1937 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 8(2), 8(3), 9, 9(3), 11, 12 and 13; Evidence Act - Sections 3; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; States (Laws) Act, 1951; Revenue Recovery Act, 1890 - Sections 5; Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 195; Government
AIR1963Bom254; (1963)65BOMLR131; 1963CriLJ603; ILR1963Bom115
power to attach property pending an appeal and Sub-section (2) of Section 17A provides that the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), relating to attachment before judgment under that Code shall, so far … Act. Section 4 requires the employer to fix wags periods. Section 5 prescribes the time of payment of wages. Section 7 enumerates deductions which the employer could make from the wages payable to his employees. Section 8 deals … amount shall, without prejudice to any other mode or recovery, be recovered as an arrear of land revenue.' Section 16 deals with cases where a single application could be filed in respect of claims from unpaid group. Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRakesh Kumar Jaiswal Alias Guddu Vs. Prescribed Authority and ors.
Allahabad
Apr-10-2002
Labour and Industrial
Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 15(2) and 16; Payment of Wages (Procedure) Rules, 1937 - Rule 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 43, Rules 1 and 2
2002(3)AWC2047; [2002(94)FLR201]; (2002)IIILLJ369All; (2002)2UPLBEC1394
The fact emerges in the present case is that the prescribed authority under the provisions of Payment of Wages Act have allowed the workman's application for payment of wages and compensation thereof under Sections 16 and 15(2) … allowed the workman's application for payment of wages and compensation thereof under Sections 16 and 15(2) of the Payment of Wages Act. Aggrieved by the … of the employer on the ground of limitation. Thereafteremployer preferred an appeal as contemplated under Order XLIII of the Code of Civil Procedure before the respondent No. 2 praying therein that the order dated 18.10.1995 has been passed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Andhra Pradesh Hotels Association, Rep. by Secretary, G.V. Krishna ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-12-2001
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 7 and 9; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Article 19 and 19(1)
2001(4)ALT292; (2001)IILLJ1378AP
1928. The relevant resolutions of the convention are embodied in Articles 223 - 228 of the International Labour Code. The object of these resolutions as stated in Art. 224 was to fix minimum wages in industries in … No.9248 of 1991 dated 29-1-1994. It is further contended that the impugned order was issued in accordance with sections 3 and 4 of the Minimum Wages Act 1948 duly following the procedure prescribed under Sec. 5 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBarihdra Kumar Ghose and ors. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Nov-23-1909
Criminal
7Ind.Cas.359
under Sections 121, 121A and 122 of the Indian Penal Code.21. It is provided by Section 196 of the Code of Criminal Procedure that no Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under Chapter VI of the … on Sections 121, 121A, and 122 of the Indian Penal Code.69. Section 121 is in these terms: 'Whoever wages war against the Queen, or attempts to wage such war, or abets the waging of such war, shall … 15th of May at Baniachang in Sylhet, Krishna Jiban Sanyal on the 16th of May at Kansat, Indra Nath Nandi on the 23rd of June
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »