Advanced Search Results

K. Vijayakumar Vs. State rep. by Dy. S.P Vigilance and Anti Corruption ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

were marked on their side. After closure of the prosecution evidence, accused was questioned under section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') and he denied all the incriminating circumstances brought against … 27.6.1991 to 10.2.1992 was entrusted with government money for disbursement of unemployment wages to eligible unemployed youths, misusing his official position for his personal gain … Corruption Bureau, Palakkad in Crime No.2/1994 of VACB, Palakkad alleging offences under sections 13(1)(c) and 13(1)(d) read with section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'P.C.Act'), 1988 and sections 409, 465 and

Risal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 15 and 17; Railway Establishment Code - Rule 2044

Reported in : AIR1958P& H155

be taken away by law. It is pertinent to note that Section 100-A introduced by 2002 Amendment of the Code starts with a non obstante clause. The purpose of such clause is to give the enacting part of … by Risal Singh and Gobind Singh are both against orders of the Authority constituted under the Payment of Wages Act (No. IV) of 1936 dismissing the petitioners' applications under Section 15 of the Act, and although the … P. M. for the period in question and filed an application on 13-11-1954 before the Authority under Section 15 of the Act.5. The facts in

Jivanlal Kandas Vs. Ramtuji Bhaiji

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1944)46BOMLR795

sought to be attached were part of their wages and that under Section 60 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, no part of their wages could be attached. This contention was upheld by the execution Court which … K. B. 360 the question that arose for consideration was whether the word ' remuneration ' occurring in Section 13 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1906, which excepts from the definition of ' workman ' any person employed

Abdul Raheman @ Shami Ahmed Sha and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Land Acquisition

as 108 documents, apart from 48 material objects. Thereafter, the statement of the accused, under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Hereinafter referred to as the Cr.PC , for brevity) having been recorded, the court … - Explosive Acts 1908 - Section 4, Section 5 - Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Section 10, Section 13, Section 18, Section 20, Section 21, Section 23 Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 65-B - Appeal against … join unlawful organisation of Lashkar-E-Toiba and in the pretext of Jihad to wage-war against the India and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 10,

The Management of Statesman Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Lt. Governor, Delhi an ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : The Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 3(2); Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 3, 5(2), 13A and 17; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 14; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 1(3); Industrial Disputed (Amendment) Act, 1955

Reported in : 11(1975)DLT204; 1975LabIC543; (1975)IILLJ33Del

(6) Mr. Pai has laid consdierable emphasis on the fact that the Working Journalists Act was a complete code and by necessary intendment excluded instrumentality of the Industrial ADisputes Act. The argument as advanced is very attractive. … to consider and decide upon its recommendations. The provision also entities the Government to fix interim rate of wages (Section 13-A). The reliefs claimed by the third respondent from the petitioner/management in the instant case are not covered

Shaikh Badarunnisa Begum Shaikh Abbas Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1978 - Sections 11(3) and 13; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Contempt of Courts Act

Reported in : [2004(101)FLR1105]; 2004(2)MhLj407

the Tribunal. Thus, the jurisdiction of the Civil Court and the Tribunal is concurrent. Under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure ('the Code' for short), the Courts under the Code have jurisdiction to entertain all suits … Therefore, a person in whose favour an order of reinstatement with back wages is made can approach the Tribunal for execution of that order in … Ranjana Desai, J.1. In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for a declaration that a complaint under Section 13(1) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 ('the said Act' for short)

State of Gujarat Vs. Shahnawaz Abdulgafur Bhatti

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 25(1), 25(1AA), 25(1B) and 39; Foreigners Act, 1964 - Sections 13(2) and 14; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 4, 5, 6 and 7; Evidence Act - Sections 25 and 27; Prisoners Act; Indian Wireless and Telegraphs Act, 1933 - Sections 3 and 6(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 121, 121A, 122 and 123, 124A, 196, 313, 374(2); Indian Passport Rules, 1950 - Rules 3 and 5, 6; Foreigners Order, 1948 - Rules 3(5) and 5(2); Indian Foreigners (Report to Police) Orders, 1971; Criminal Law Amendment 1961; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 366(1); Constitution of India - Articles 17, 29, 18, 19, 22 to 30 32 to 37 to 60, 309, 347 and 362

Reported in : (2008)1GLR346

the proceedings of Sessions Case Nos. 11 of 2002 and 18 of 2003 made under Section 366(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure ('the Code' for short) by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 2, … aforesaid question, it would be advantageous to refer to Section 121 of I.P.C., which reads as under:121. Whoever wages war against the Government of India, or attempts to wage such war, or abets the waging of such … I.P.C., 124A I.P.C; Sections 25(1)(d), 25(1)(a), 25(1AA) of the Arms Act; Sections 13(2) and 14 of the Foreigners Act; Sections 4(b), 5 and 6 of

Jeewanlal (1929) Ltd. Etc. Etc. Vs. Appellate Authority Under the Paym ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 4(2)

Reported in : AIR1984SC1842; (1985)1CompLJ318(SC); [1984(49)FLR313]; (1984)IILLJ464SC; 1984(2)SCALE303; (1984)4SCC356; [1985]1SCR664; 1985(1)SLJ38(SC); 1985(17)LC106(SC)

degree of certainty, but also to create and bring into force a self-contained, all embracing, complete and comprehensive code relating to gratuity. The significance of this legislation lies in the acceptance of the principle of gratuity as … would have earned in a consecutive period of 15 days or in 13 working days and therefore, in calculating the amount of gratuity payable to … dated June 19, 1981 raise a question of substantial importance. The question is whether the words 'fifteen days' wages'occurring in Sub-section (2) of Section 4 of the payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the

Works Manager, Northern Railway Workshop Vs. Mathuradas, Painter

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1973(6)WLN25

who gave him the benefit of doubt and acquitted him of the offence under Section 323, Indian Penal Code, on 7/4/70 Mathuradas then applied for reinstatement and he was reinstated on 27/4/70 by order Ex. N--2 which runs … an order of the District Judge,, Bikaner, dismissing his appeal against an order of the the Payment of Wages Authority, passed on the application of Mathuradas respondent.2. Mathuradas was employed as a skilled painter in the Railway … Appellant was found to have completed the age of 16 years and 13 days on the date of alleged occurrence - Appellant was arrested on

Yesumithra Sabanna Vs. Chief Manager, Nitin Arun Nivsarkar, Central Ra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

the Respondent's challenge to the refusal of the Revisional Court for sanction of prosecution under Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is concerned, it is apparent from the record that what the Respondent alleges as false … to reinstate the first Respondent employee in his original post with continuity of service and with 50% back wages. Writ Petition No.638 of 2016 is filed by the first Respondent employee challenging the revisional order referred to … was conveyed by the Petitioner to the Respondent by its letter dated 13 November 1996. (xv) The Respondent, thereupon, challenged the dismissal order by approaching