Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the code on social security 2020 section 2 · Page 1 of about 2,657 results (0.106 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 29 2021

In Re Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-29-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, 2008, following is the statement made:- i. Unorganized Workers Social Security Act, 2008 has been subsumed in the Code on Social Security, 2020. Labour Department, GNCTD is drafting Rules under Code on Social Security Code, 2020. ii. Central Government is in … migrant workmen (whether or not in addition to other workmen) on any day of the preceding twelve months.43. Section 2 is a definition clause. Sub-clause(b) defines “contractor” and sub-clause(e) defines “inter- state migrant workman” as follows:- “2. Definitions.-

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2022

Maniben Maganbhai Bhariya Vs. District Development Officer

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Government establishments. There is a similar definition of establishment under clause 29 of Section 2 of the Code on Social Security, 2020 which received the assent of the President on 28th September 2020. These provisions show the legislative intent to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2023

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-17-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

132 Hindu Succession Act 1956 and the Indian Succession Act 1925. 133 Section 55 of the Code of Social Security 2020 provides that each employee who has completed one year of service shall nominate from his family for the … the following manner to include the solemnization of marriages between non- heterosexual persons: i. The word "man" in Section 2(b) includes "any person", and that correspondingly, the word "woman" includes "any person"; 34 Reliance was placed on Union

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 06 2026

A.Sunder Singh Vs The Recovery officer

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-06-2026

the impugned Garnishee Order in No. 66000083220001018/RRC/SRO/TLI dated 06.01.2026 passed by the first respondent under Section 131(3) of the Code on Social Security, 2020, and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to W.P.(MD) No.3364 of 2026 Vs. Page … BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.2780, 2782, 2783, 2784, 2785, 2786, 2788, 2790 & 2791 of 2026 W.P.(MD) No.3363 of 2026 Vs. State Bank of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 2026

M/s.Janet Matriculation School, Vs Employees State Insurance Corporati ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-13-2026

issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned Garnishee order under Sec.131(3)of the code on social security 2020 dated 27.01.2026 and 10.02.2026 in No. 66-000-40346-000-1302/RRC/SRO/TLI in respect of certificate Nos.C-19 938/25 and 941/25 dated 30.09.2025 of … & R5ORDERThis writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned Garnishee orders passed by the 2nd respondent under Section 131(3)of the Code on Social Security, 2020, dated 27.01.2026 and 10.02.20262. Mr.C.Karthick, learned counsel takes notice forrespondents 1, … Union Bank of India, Thiruverkadu, Tiruvallur-600077. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2026

M/s.P.Ravi kumar contractor Vs Assistant Director

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-27-2026

to conduct a fresh enquiry under Section 45 of the Employees State Insurance Act (presently Sec 125 of the code on Social Security, 2020) providing adequate opportunity to the petitioner. Page1 of 5For Petitioner(s): Mr.Anand Gopalan for Advit Law Chambers For Respondent(s): … IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP.No.12758 of 2026 M/s.P.Ravi kumar contractor Puthur post, Attur Tk, Salem District-636 112

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2025

T.Senthilkumari vs the Deputy High Commission for the

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-12-2025

this article, a diplomatic agent shall with respect to services rendered for the sending State be exempt from social security provisions which may be in force in the receiving State.2. The exemption provided for in paragraph 1 of … Such agent cannot be sued without the express permission of the Central Government as per Section 86 of the Code of Civil Procedure. However, with reference to the remedies under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, already, the question … days of service intwo calendar years as early as in the year 2020 and therefore, deemed to be permanent.8. To consider the petitioner as contract … petitioner has put in long number of years of service from the year 2008 onwards, the provision under Section 2(oo)(bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 cannot be invoked as it is a contract employment and therefore, non-employment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2022

Dr.Sunny Joseph vs the Recovery Officer,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-01-2022

the particulars in respect of your factory/establishment submitted by you the report of the inspection conducted by the Social Security Officer, who inspected your establishment on -NA-, your establishment falls within the purview of Section 1(5) of the … of the principles of natural justice. The establishment had more than ten employees and rightly so, were allotted the code number. The inspection note prima facie establish that petitioner’s wife had been working in the establishment and was … (muster roll) for financial years 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2020-21 and wages register for the same very period as Annexures 1 and … P.O., Kollam, a private nursing hospital having employees less than ten(10) in number. As per the provisions of Section 2(12) of the 1948 Act, would not be brought within thedomain of an establishment defined under the provisions of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2022

Dr. Sunny Joseph vs the Deputy Director

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-01-2022

the particulars in respect of your factory/establishment submitted by you the report of the inspection conducted by the Social Security Officer, who inspected your establishment on -NA-, your establishment falls within the purview of Section 1(5) of the … of the principles of natural justice. The establishment had more than ten employees and rightly so, were allotted the code number. The inspection note prima facie establish that petitioner’s wife had been working in the establishment and was … (muster roll) for financial years 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2020-21 and wages register for the same very period as Annexures 1 and … P.O., Kollam, a private nursing hospital having employees less than ten(10) in number. As per the provisions of Section 2(12) of the 1948 Act, would not be brought within thedomain of an establishment defined under the provisions of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2023

Central Board of Trustees vs M/S.Asianet Communications (P) Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-18-2023

LTD. ASIANET COMPLEX, PULIYARAKONAM, THIRUVANANTHPAURAM 695 573. 2 THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SCOPE MINAR 4TH FLOOR, CODE L, LAXMI NAGAR, NEW DELHI 110 092, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. BY ADVS. SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR NITA N.S THIS … raised before the Commissioner. The Act of 1952 is a social welfare legislation and successful implementation of the social security scheme. But in this process, respondent was also duty bound for smooth implementation of the Act and Scheme.3. … was served with an order dated 14.12.2010 by invoking the provisions of Section 7A of the Act demanding a sum of Rs.11,99,244/- for the period

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial