Advanced Search Results

Gow (Fc) Vs. Grant (Scotland)

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

secondly, that the economic burden of caring for a child that cohabitants have had together is shared until the child is 16." Later in the same contribution which she made to the debate, referring to what is now … its Royal Assent on 20 January 2006. 8. This appeal is concerned with the meaning and effect of section 28 of the 2006 Act. It provides that a cohabitant can apply to a court for financial provision when … her discussion of the issues, that the approach which she required to adopt was not the same as under section 9(1)(b) of the 1985 Act,

Mr. Ankur Gupta Vs. The Central Adoption and Resources Agency

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

their residence to enable them to conduct a detailed Home-Study and said report is to be posted in the Child Adoption Resource Information and Guidance System by SAA vide 32 Regulation 9(11) as per prescribed format viz., Schedule VII … adoption in the State of origin and after exploring such possibility, the child should be placed for Inter-country adoption. Section 59(1) of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (for short ‘Juvenile Justice Act’) states that … she had already acquired US Citizenship on 19.05.2016 and OCI card on 28.06.2016, but they chose to keep the column blank for reasons best known.

Attorney General For India Vs. Satish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

hospital, management or staff of an educational institution or religious institution; relative of the child through blood or adoption or marriage or guardianship or in foster care or having a domestic relationship with a parent of the … opinion of this Court, stricter proof and serious allegations are required. The act of pressing of breast of the child aged 12 years, in the absence of any specific details as to whether 5 the top was removed … Protection Case No.28/2017 convicted and sentenced the accused-Satish for the offences under Sections 342, 354 and 363 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’)

Caban Vs. Mohammed

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Education

the question of whether consent is required is entirely separate from the consideration of the best interests of the child. In this very case, the Surrogate held that adoption by appellant was impermissible absent Maria's consent, whereas adoption … the cases. On the other hand, fathers took no part in over 28% of the relinquishment adoptions, apparently because they never had custody, while the … to appellees' contention, it is clear that § 111 treats unmarried parents differently according to their sex. The section's consent requirement is no mere formality, since the New York courts have held that the question of whether

Ml (Ap) (Scotland) Vs. Ans and Another

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

child's life, of the making of an adoption order." 9. It is also necessary to have regard to section 28, which so far as material provides: "(1) An adoption order is an order made by the appropriate court

Ms. Eera Through Dr. Manjula Krippendorf Vs. State (Govt. Of Nct of De ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

to 27 of the POCSO Act to highlight that there is a special procedure for recording statement of the child and, therefore, when medical evidence had established the mental age, the victim’s biological age should not be the … sought to be achieved, and the consequences that may flow from the adoption of one in preference to the other possible interpretation. Thus, the Court … a certificate of the neuro­physician and the psychologist of AIIMS, New Delhi was filed. She had referred to Section 28 of the POCSO Act which deals with Special Courts. She had also drawn attention of the Court to

Pinki versus State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]5S.C.R.522

not be separated from their parents against their will except when it is in the best interests of the child. Adoption is considered an alternate care mechanism for children who are unable to live with their parents due to … 193/2023, FIR No. 76/2023, FIR No. 74/2023 and FIR No. 50/2023 respectively registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 311 and 370(5) of the Indian Penal Code (for short, the “IPC”). 4. These appeals have been … NCT, Delhi & Anr. [2001] 2 SCR 684 : (2001) 4 SCC 280; Ram Govind Upadhyay v. Sudarshan Singh [2002] 2 SCR 526 : (2002)

Pinki versus State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 522

not be separated from their parents against their will except when it is in the best interests of the child. Adoption is considered an alternate care mechanism for children who are unable to live with their parents due to … 193/2023, FIR No. 76/2023, FIR No. 74/2023 and FIR No. 50/2023 respectively registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 311 and 370(5) of the Indian Penal Code (for short, the “IPC”). 4. These appeals have been … NCT, Delhi & Anr. [2001] 2 SCR 684 : (2001) 4 SCC 280; Ram Govind Upadhyay v. Sudarshan Singh [2002] 2 SCR 526 : (2002)

Dr. Rohit Dandekar Vs. Dr. Raj Kavitha

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 26; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 6; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 19

Reported in : ILR2003KAR4431

of the proceedings and the intendment clearly reflects the paramount concern of the Court towards the welfare of the child. In otherwords, the intendment is that dispute between the parents should not shatter or come in the healthy … order, of a Family Court to the High Court both on facts and on law'.6. Sub-section (2) of Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 reads as follows:-'(2) Order made by the Court in any proceedings under … the only thing to be considered by us is whether the procedure adopted by the learned Family Judge is unfair and in violation of the

State of Nct of Delhi vs.rohtash

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

value of oath under Oath Act, 1969, oath was not administered to her.23. While appreciating the evidence of the child witness, the Apex Court held in Ratansinh Dalsukhbhai Nayak v. State of Gujarat, AIR2004SC23 and relevant para reads … under Section 313 Cr.P.C., the respondent has denied that Tamanna @ Tanya was ever given to them in adoption. He however stated that Tamanna merely used to visit them as they were issue-less.9. He had taken the