Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the child adoption section 22 · Page 1 of about 4,179 results (0.105 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 08 1980

Hirabai and anr. Vs. Babu Manika Ingale

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-08-1980

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 11, 12, 13 and 16; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 14 and 14(1); Transfer of Property Act

Reported in : AIR1980Bom315; 1980MhLJ494

on Ss. 12 and 13 and those read as under:-'12. An adopted child shall be deemed to be the child of his or her adoptive father or mother for all purposes with effect from the date of the … got interest by birth, the date of his birth only being fixed fictionally to the date of the adoption. Section 13 of the Adoption Act is clearly enabling and does not deal with the property wherein by reason

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 1967

Mary Cheriyan and anr. Vs. Bhargavi Pillai Bhasura Devi and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-17-1967

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Marumakkathavam Law; Travancore Nayar Act - Sections 36

Reported in : AIR1968Ker82

Raman Nayar, J. 1. The question before us is whether, under the Marumak-kathayam law, a subsequently conceived child gets a right by birth in the property obtained by its mother for her separate share in the … in common or not) Admission to this body is, by birth (or adoption) into the family, in the female line in the case of a … gift should benefit the "thavazhi" of the donees. Statute Law has made inroads into his rule. For instance, Section 22 of the Nayar Act of 1100 has provided that gifts of the kind envisaged by the section will

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 1982

Umesh Chandra Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-02-1982

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Rajasthan Children Act, 1970 - Sections 3 and 26; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 363, 363A, 364, 366A and 375; Evidence Act - Sections 34, 35, 73 and 74

Reported in : AIR1982SC1057; 1982(1)SCALE335; (1982)2SCC202; [1982]3SCR583; 1982(14)LC426(SC); 1982 Cri LJ 994

Section 26 of the Act enjoins a duty on the Court in which the proceeding in respect of the child is pending on the date on which the Act is extended to the area to act in the … the headmistress of St. Teressa Primary School, Ajmer. The High Court seems to have rejected this document by adopting a very peculiar process of reasoning which apart from being unintelligible is also legally erroneous. The High Court … the exact date of birth of the appellant was proved to be 22.9.1956. After the finding of fact called for from the High Court was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 15 2024

Moidutty Musliyar vs Sub Inspector Vadakkencherry Police Station

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-15-2024

village is the submission. According to the petitioners, the 1st petitioner's wife delivered his daughter on 27.11.1994. However, the child has not joined the school at her appropriate age. Therefore, she was admitted to the primary school, giving … contained shall affect the capacity of any persons to act in the following matters(namely), marriage, dower, divorce and adoption. Section 2 says that to the religion or religious rites and usages of any class of citizens of India … the Child Development Project Officer, Alathur on CRL.MC NO. 2515 OF 2016 2216.12.2013, based on which the officer concerned submitted a complaint to the police

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 1959

Mukta Bai and ors Vs. Kamalaksha and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-01-1959

Subject : FamilyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 20, 21, 22, 22(1), 22(2) and 22(3); Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1946

Reported in : AIR1960Kant182; AIR1960Mys182; ILR1959KAR1078

the estate of their putative father under the provisions of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956(Central Act LXXVIII) of 1956). His contention is that … clause (ix) of that section, an illegitimate daughter is also a dependant so long as the remains unmarried.(11) Section 22 provides for the maintenance of the dependants enumerated in S. 21. That section reads:'Maintenance of dependents. 22. (1) … section, a Hindu is bound, during his or her lifetime, to maintain his or her legitimate or illegitimate children and his or her infirm parents. It is, therefore, clear that the provisions of that section constitute a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 2009

R (on the Application of G) (Fc) (Appellant) Vs. London Borough of Sou ...

Court : House of Lords

Decided on : May-20-2009

Subject : Land Acquisition

in the Barnet and Lambeth cases to have been correct). The definition of a “looked after” child in section 22 was at the same time amended to make it clear that it did not include children who were … was issued after section 17(6) of the Children Act 1989 (para 10 above) had been amended by the Adoption and Children Act 2002. As originally enacted, this had not included express reference to providing accommodation for families

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 1983

Lehr Vs. Robertson

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-27-1983

Subject : Right to Information

appellee) after the child was born. Subsequently, when the child was over two years old, appellees filed an adoption petition in the Ulster County, N.Y. Family Court, which entered an order of adoption. Appellant never supported the … NEW YORK Syllabus Appellant is the putative father of a child born out of wedlock. Appellee mother of the child married another man (also an appellee) after the child was born. Subsequently, when the child was over two … with Jessica. Notice of that proceeding was served on appellee on February 22, 1979. Four days later, appellee's attorney informed the Ulster County Court that … provided: "2. Persons entitled to notice, pursuant to subdivision one of this section, shall include:" "(a) any person adjudicated by a court in this state

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 1979

Caban Vs. Mohammed

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-24-1979

Subject : Education

the question of whether consent is required is entirely separate from the consideration of the best interests of the child. In this very case, the Surrogate held that adoption by appellant was impermissible absent Maria's consent, whereas adoption … of friction between them, the mother, and her new husband. E.g., App. 22, 25; Tr. 7, 12-20, 36, 50, 70 (Mar. 19, 1976); Tr. 130-135, … to appellees' contention, it is clear that § 111 treats unmarried parents differently according to their sex. The section's consent requirement is no mere formality, since the New York courts have held that the question of whether

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2013

Snehalaya’s Snehankur Adoption Centre, Through Its Authorized Sig ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Aug-06-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the child and that regulatory bodies are set up to ensure the strict enforcement of these rules. Section 22 provides for Ensuring child friendly procedures, which reads thus: 22 Ensuring child friendly procedures: All matters and procedures … 2003, provides that the State shall undertake measures to ensure that children without families are either placed for adoption, preferably intracountry adoption, or foster care or any other family substitute services. Clause (d) of Section 17 reads

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2017

Dundappa a/F Goudappa Dasappanavar Vs. Sundrawwa W/O Rangangouda Birad ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Aug-01-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

giving a child in adoption and3) It should be shown that it is signed by the person taking the child in adoption. In the instant case, since all these three conditions are fulfilled, a presumption as under Section … the suit of the respondent, whereas, the cross objector in her cross- objection filed under Order 41 Rule 22 of CPC has prayed to set aside the finding of the trial Court on issue Nos.2 to 5

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial