Advanced Search Results
Shreya Singhal Vs. U.O.I.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-24-2015
Land Acquisition
the world of a difference. This is perhaps why in Kameshwar Prasad & Ors. v. The State of Bihar & Anr., 1962 Supp. (3) S.C.R. 369, this Court held: "As regards these decisions of the American Courts, … standards for those who apply them. A vague law impermissibly delegates basic policy matters to policemen, judges, and juries for resolution on an ad hoc … originally stood) this sub-head was conspicuously absent. Because of its absence, challenges made to an order made under Section 7 of the Punjab Maintenance of Public Order Act and to an order made under Section 9 (1)(a) of … abuse of freedom of expression was less due to inherent infrastructural and logistical constrains. In the case of said mediums, it was almost impossible for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJustice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India
Supreme Court of India
Sep-26-2018
Right to Information
Enrolment Proof-of-Concept Report’ studying enrolment proof-of-concept in three rural areas of Karnataka, Bihar and Andhra Pradesh published by the UIDAI. According to this report, ‘the … from time to time and the Authority shall be bound to carry out such directions on questions of policy. Section 53 empowers the Central Government to make rules to carry out the provisions of the Act generally as … from time to time.32) Chapter III deals with ‘authentication’, which has generated the maximum debate in these proceedings. Section 7 falling under this Chapter mandates that proof of Aadhaar number would be necessary for receipt of certain subsidies, … in implementation of UIDAI, such as appointment of the State/UT UID Commissioners, logistics support and coordination with various departments and State units. As they say,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGmr Chhattisgarh Energy Limited Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Delhi
Feb-06-2015
Land Acquisition
Ltd. Vs.State of Kerala & Ors. in Civil Appeal Nos.10103-10106 of 2010 decided on 06.02.2014; ii) State of Bihar & Ors. v. Kalyanpur Cement Ltd.; (2010 3 SCC274and iii) Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner; (1978) … additional affidavit, had filed reply to the same and contended that the policy governing the RTC was not new but was formulated on 09.12.2004 and … Railways replied to the petitioner that the imported coal to power houses in the country, as per the logistics plan issued by the Railway Board, the power plants in Chattisgarh State have been linked to Western Ports … No.1 that the RTC was granted in anticipation of doubling of TIGRSD section and since this could not be done, therefore, the petitioner could not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re : Distribution Of Essential Supplies And Services During Pandemi ...
Supreme Court of India
May-31-2021
MRTP
rural areas would be much lower”. (ii) The report also noted that in a few Indian States like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam the tele density is less than 75%; and (iii) The monthly income of persons … Vaccination by Private Hospitals under the Liberalized Vaccination Policy E.3 Basis and Impact of Differential Pricing E.4 Vaccine Logistics E.5 Digital Divide F Conclusion 2 PART A A Introduction 1 Proceedings in the present suo motu writ … notes provided by the Amici. 4 PART B B Submission by Counsel 7 Mr Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General, relying on the UoI‟s affidavit dated … AND SERVICES DURING PANDEMIC1ORDER This order has been divided into the following sections to facilitate analysis: A Introduction B Submission by Counsel C National Vaccination
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Pramila Nesargi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Karnataka
Nov-20-1996
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 3; ;Cantonment Land (Administration) Rules, 1937 - Rules 5(1), 14(3) and 14(5); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 45, 52 and 57
ILR1997KAR1810
nullifies the contract and renders it void and unenforceable. (See decisions of the Supreme Court in STATE OF BIHAR v. KARAM CHAND THAPAR AND BROTHERS LTD., BIKHRAJ JAIPURlA v. UNION OF INDIA STATE OF WEST BENGAL v. … Act and Article 299(1) of the Constitution on the ground of public policy - on the ground of protection of general public - and these … be deposited by M/s ABCL with the Govt. Treasury in advance. M/s. ABCL will be responsible for all logistical management and proper conduct of the event;4. Arrangements may please be made for providing adequate external security and … the nature of an amusement for the participants drawn from the affluent section of the society from across the globe. In the case of Manila … date of receiving the said direction itself i.e., 7.11.1996 under a communication addressed to the fourth respondent
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSonali Pramod Dhawde Vs. Central Bank of India and Another
Mumbai
Apr-01-2013
Education
exposition of the Constitution Bench of the Apex Court in the case of D.C.Wadhwa (Dr.) vs. State of Bihar (1987) 1 SCC 378). In paragraph 3, the Court has observed thus: “3. ….......... The rule of law … under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, primarily, challenges the recruitment policy of the respondent-Bank dated 5.3.2009 - of permitting filling of vacancies in … opposed granting of any relief to the petitioners. 7. After having perused the pleadings and the accompanying … able to successfully compete with the private sector and also recorded substantial profits. That was because of the logistical advantage PSBs have and the abiding faith of the stakeholders in them - being public sector undertakings. The … ratio of the above noted three judgments is that in terms of Section 4 of the 1959 Act, every public employer is duty bound to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDelhi High Court Bar Association and anr Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ...
Delhi
Oct-09-2013
Land Acquisition
They rely on the three Judge Bench judgment in (1983) 4 SCC45 Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Limited v. State of Bihar where it was held by the Hon‘ble Supreme Court that courts ―cannot look into the reasons why the … not admit of judicial review by their very nature. Matters concerning foreign policy, relations with other countries, defence policy, power to enter into treaties with … direct to be reserved for the consideration; or (c) Relates to matters referred to in sub-section (5) of section 7 or section 19 or section 34 or sub-section (3) of section 43. Explanation:- For the purposes of this
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaj. Amod Kumar Vs. Union of India
Supreme Court of India
Sep-06-2018
Education
in regard to members of the armed forces is far more limited and 6Shilpi Bose v. State of Bihar, 1991 Supp (2) SCC659 Union of India v. S.L. Abbas, (1993) 4 SCC357 and, National Hydroelectric Power Corpn. … while adjudicating an Order passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal on a Policy Circular dated January 20, 2009 issued by the Government of India which … P.K. Choudhary’s Case was not rendered in 2(2005) 7 SCC227 6 the context of transfers or posting … vital stream which is primarily responsible for ensuring provisioning, procurement, and distribution of supplies. ASC personnel provide the logistical support in the form of transportation, maintenance of vehicles, driving in difficult terrain, preserving equipment, and conserving fuel … ..........................J.(INDU MALHOTRA) New Delhi September 6, 2018. 15 ITEM No.1501 Court No.9 SECTION X (For Judgment) S U P R E M E C O
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBombay Environmental Action Group, a Society Registered Under the Soci ... Overruled
Mumbai
Oct-17-2005
CivilProperty
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(7), 2(9A), 2(12), 22, 22A, 29, 31, 31(5), 33, 37, 37(1), 37(1A), 37(1AA), 37(2), 38, 50, 58(1), 125, 126, 126(1), 127, 128 and 149; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1915 - Sections 3; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1954 - Sections 7; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1955; Mysore Town and Country Planning Act, 1961; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Article 48A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 31, 47, 48A, 51A, 141, 142, 226 and 368; Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1904-1952;Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 1, 52, 52(4), 53(1), 56, 57, 58, 58(1), 58(2), 58(3), 58(4), 58(5), 58(6), 58(7), 58(8), 59(9) and 62(3); Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearan
2005(6)BomCR574; (2005)107BOMLR337; (2006)4CompLJ117(Bom)
other Regulations;(ii) for diversified industrial users in accordance with the industrial location policy, with office space only ancillary to and required for such users, subject … Planning Act, 1915 (the first town planning legislation in respect of the city, now known as Mumbai) and Section 7 of the Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 contained similar provisions regarding open spaces, playgrounds etc.12. Mr. Chagla contended … Article 21 in cases like Samanta v. State of Andhra Pradesh, and in Madhu Kishore v. State of Bihar.23. The right to development cannot be treated as a mere right to economic betterment or cannot be limited
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDelhi High Court Bar Association and anr. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi an ...
Delhi
Oct-09-2013
Land Acquisition
They rely on the three Judge Bench judgment in (1983) 4 SCC45 Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Limited v. State of Bihar where it was held by the Hon‘ble Supreme Court that courts ―cannot look into the reasons why the … not admit of judicial review by their very nature. Matters concerning foreign policy, relations with other countries, defence policy, power to enter into treaties with … direct to be reserved for the consideration; or (c) Relates to matters referred to in sub-section (5) of section 7 or section 19 or section 34 or sub-section (3) of section 43. Explanation:- For the purposes of this
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »