Advanced Search Results

Eta Engineering Pvt Ltd vs Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd

Court : Chennai

Officer, Indian Overseas Bank and others v. Ashok Saw Mill5; vi. Hindustan Steel Works Construction v. State of Bihar and others6; vii. Signal Apparels Pvt Ltd v. Canara Bank and others7; viii. Standard Chartered Bank and others … from 30.6.2016 and, therefore, norestructuring could take place, as benefit of rehabilitation policy is not applicable in those cases where the borrower has been classified … by the DRT.4.2. To fortify the aforesaid submissions, learned SeniorCounsel relied upon the following decisions: i. Kesar Multimodal Logistics Ltd v. Union of India15; ii. Transstroy India Ltd and another v. Canara Bank and others16; iii. Shri … further stated that, on 31.3.2017, the petitioner received a demand notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

on enrolment process known as ‘UID Enrolment Proof-of-Concept Report’ studying enrolment proof-of-concept in three rural areas of Karnataka, Bihar and Andhra Pradesh published by the UIDAI. According to this report, ‘the biometric matching analysis of 40,000 people … from time to time and the Authority shall be bound to carry out such directions on questions of policy. Section 53 empowers the Central Government to make rules to carry out the provisions of the Act generally as … adopted Writ Petition (Civil) No.494 of 2012 & c onnected matters Page 13 of 567 for achieving its objectives.12) The matter was addressed in the … in implementation of UIDAI, such as appointment of the State/UT UID Commissioners, logistics support and coordination with various departments and State units. As they say,

Gmr Chhattisgarh Energy Limited Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ltd. Vs.State of Kerala & Ors. in Civil Appeal Nos.10103-10106 of 2010 decided on 06.02.2014; ii) State of Bihar & Ors. v. Kalyanpur Cement Ltd.; (2010 3 SCC274and iii) Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner; (1978) … additional affidavit, had filed reply to the same and contended that the policy governing the RTC was not new but was formulated on 09.12.2004 and … Railways replied to the petitioner that the imported coal to power houses in the country, as per the logistics plan issued by the Railway Board, the power plants in Chattisgarh State have been linked to Western Ports … No.1 that the RTC was granted in anticipation of doubling of TIGRSD section and since this could not be done, therefore, the petitioner could not … set up coal based thermal power plant of 1370 MW (2 x 685 MW) at Village Raikheda,

In Re : Distribution Of Essential Supplies And Services During Pandemi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

rural areas would be much lower”. (ii) The report also noted that in a few Indian States like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam the tele density is less than 75%; and (iii) The monthly income of persons … Vaccination by Private Hospitals under the Liberalized Vaccination Policy E.3 Basis and Impact of Differential Pricing E.4 Vaccine Logistics E.5 Digital Divide F Conclusion 2 PART A A Introduction 1 Proceedings in the present suo motu writ … Government 12 Guidance Note For COWIN20 dated 28 February 2021, available at 13 Press releases dated 28 February 2021 and 19 April 2021, available at … AND SERVICES DURING PANDEMIC1ORDER This order has been divided into the following sections to facilitate analysis: A Introduction B Submission by Counsel C National Vaccination

Mrs. Pramila Nesargi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 3; ;Cantonment Land (Administration) Rules, 1937 - Rules 5(1), 14(3) and 14(5); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 45, 52 and 57

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1810

nullifies the contract and renders it void and unenforceable. (See decisions of the Supreme Court in STATE OF BIHAR v. KARAM CHAND THAPAR AND BROTHERS LTD., BIKHRAJ JAIPURlA v. UNION OF INDIA STATE OF WEST BENGAL v. … Act and Article 299(1) of the Constitution on the ground of public policy - on the ground of protection of general public - and these … GANGETIC FISHERMEN CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. v. SIPAHI SINGH 13. It will also be useful to refer to … be deposited by M/s ABCL with the Govt. Treasury in advance. M/s. ABCL will be responsible for all logistical management and proper conduct of the event;4. Arrangements may please be made for providing adequate external security and … the nature of an amusement for the participants drawn from the affluent section of the society from across the globe. In the case of Manila

Bombay Environmental Action Group, a Society Registered Under the Soci ... Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(7), 2(9A), 2(12), 22, 22A, 29, 31, 31(5), 33, 37, 37(1), 37(1A), 37(1AA), 37(2), 38, 50, 58(1), 125, 126, 126(1), 127, 128 and 149; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1915 - Sections 3; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1954 - Sections 7; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1955; Mysore Town and Country Planning Act, 1961; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Article 48A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 31, 47, 48A, 51A, 141, 142, 226 and 368; Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1904-1952;Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 1, 52, 52(4), 53(1), 56, 57, 58, 58(1), 58(2), 58(3), 58(4), 58(5), 58(6), 58(7), 58(8), 59(9) and 62(3); Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearan

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR574; (2005)107BOMLR337; (2006)4CompLJ117(Bom)

user subject to observance of all other Regulations;(ii) for diversified industrial users in accordance with the industrial location policy, with office space only ancillary to and required for such users, subject to and observance of all other … be sold by NTC-SM. This is specifically noted in terms in para 13 of the BIFR order dated 25th July 2005 in respect of NTC-SM … Article 21 in cases like Samanta v. State of Andhra Pradesh, and in Madhu Kishore v. State of Bihar.23. The right to development cannot be treated as a mere right to economic betterment or cannot be limited … 58 means, then whether the amendment to DCR 58 is permissible under Section 37 of the MRTP Act?d) Assuming the amendment to DCR 58 was

Maj. Amod Kumar Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

in regard to members of the armed forces is far more limited and 6Shilpi Bose v. State of Bihar, 1991 Supp (2) SCC659 Union of India v. S.L. Abbas, (1993) 4 SCC357 and, National Hydroelectric Power Corpn. … while adjudicating an Order passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal on a Policy Circular dated January 20, 2009 issued by the Government of India which … Corpn. Ltd. v. Shri Bhagwan, (2001) 8 SCC574 13 narrow. It is for the higher authorities to … vital stream which is primarily responsible for ensuring provisioning, procurement, and distribution of supplies. ASC personnel provide the logistical support in the form of transportation, maintenance of vehicles, driving in difficult terrain, preserving equipment, and conserving fuel … ..........................J.(INDU MALHOTRA) New Delhi September 6, 2018. 15 ITEM No.1501 Court No.9 SECTION X (For Judgment) S U P R E M E C O

Dr. Narendra Gupta Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

litigation has been instituted by Dr Narendra Gupta in 2013 highlighting the fact that in the States of Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan, in particular, “unnecessary hysterectomies” were carried out under the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana as well … Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No 131 of 2013 Dr Narendra Gupta ... Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India & Ors ... Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya

Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

NCAP.11. In support of his submissions, Sh.P.P.Rao, the learned Senior Counsel relied upon Budhan Choudhary vs. State of Bihar; (1955) 1 SCR1045 Rashbehari Panda vs. State of Orissa; (1969) 1 SCC414 Erusian W.P.(C) No.11047/2016 Page 10 of … 19. Hotel reservation services 20. Line maintenance services 21. Locker rental 22. Logistic Centers* 23. Messenger services 24. Porter service 25. Restaurants, bars and other … led by GMR Group.2. The Government of India, as part of its policy of liberalization entrusted the functions of management of airports in India to … erroneous.27. Before proceeding further, we may have a look at the other relevant provisions of the AAI Act. Section 13 of the AAI Act provides that the undertakings of the International Airports Authority and the National Airports Authority

Verigamto Naveen Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CommercialConstitution

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 4-A, 4A(1), 4A(3) and 30; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 35, 37, 37A, 58 and 59(1); General Clauses Act; Constitution of India - Article 226; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 15 and 18

Reported in : 2001VIIIAD(SC)672; AIR2001SC3609; JT2001(8)SC29; 2001(6)SCALE363; (2001)8SCC344

Court in Harshankar vs. Deputy Excise & Taxation Commissioner 1973 (1) SCC 737; Radhakrishna Agarwal vs. State of Bihar : [1977]3SCR249 : [1977]3SCR249 ; Ram Lal & Sons vs. State of Rajasthan : [1976]2SCR222 : [1976]2SCR222 ; … The claim for renewal of leases has been refused already as the policy of the Government is not to grant lease or sub-lease in favour … as a result of which the parties have to re-establish their infrastructure and put in great deal of logistical support though for a short period once over again, to work the mines and the parties concerned. (ii) … basis that the Government had not followed due procedure as contemplated under Section 4-A of the Mines & Minerals (Regulations & Development) Act, 1957 [hereinafter … to a Full Bench.4. In writ appeals Nos. 131/94 to 134/94 and 169/94 to 175/94, the Full